Why do companies such as Procter & Gamble target emerging markets? Do you agree with this strategy?
For many years, multinational consumer goods company Procter & Gamble lagged behind its direct competitors Colgate-Palmolive and Unilever in emerging markets. Both Colgate and Unilever gain more than half of their revenue from emerging economies. P&G, on the other hand, only generates 40% of its revenue abroad, despite being the world's largest household product maker.
P&G is famous for having a rich portfolio of well-recognized brands in the personal care, beauty, grooming, health and fabric segments. As Morningstar notes, some of its brands are essential for retailers to bring more traffic to their stores and therefore enjoy privileged product positioning. More than 20 of P&G's brands generate $1 billion or more in revenues per year and they are extremely popular. These brands are famous for their high quality. However, despite the strength of its portfolio and its presence in more than 180 countries, P&G's performance in global markets is far from amazing. Global growth has roughly been 3% on a dollar basis for the past few years. Considering that there's an emerging middle-class in emerging economies, P&G could not only find a growth catalyst but also find high-profit situations abroad.
Big companies such as Procter & Gamble target emerging markets because they are determined to grow. Their strategy is to capture as much customers as they can. Procter & Gamble had a goal of reaching a billion more consumers by penetrating the emerging markets with the most population and development such as India and China. Besides, the survey from Millward Brown in 2013 does show a promising market in China for Procter and Gamble. By doing this, they are creating a profitable future; with their net sales grew 5% ($82.6 billion) for 2011. By P&G having most of the market in developed countries, gave them a low and slow growth in the long run due to market