Peachtree -Too Far Ahead of the It Curve Essay Example
Executive Summary:
To: Max Berndt, CEO Peachtree Healthcare
From: Services Consultant
Date: September 24, 2013
Peachtree’s vision is to ensure a quality, consistent and continuity of care across the entire network of care facilities but to deliver all of this at the highest levels of efficiency, economy, and respect for patients and staff. In order to be competitive in the health industry, Peachtree has obtained a number of varying health institutes via mergers. The concern is the instability of the information system as new facilities are acquired because the system of each institute is kept in service. This is creating a patchwork of incompatible and disconnected systems with the following concerns: • Inefficiencies of the company processes and procedures. • Inability for a continuation of care to flow between the various medical facilities. • Instability of the system itself has the potential of disrupting the care of its patients, and • The system is not economical because of the wasted energy and time on the current system. There is little time to implement a system because of the increasing instability of the system that can have an affect on patient care. The following alternatives are outlined in this analysis of Peachtree: Service-oriented Architecture (SOA): Flexible with selective standardization but implemented in stages to decrease the risk of failure. There is a potential deal with the vendor but that is because of it is new to the industry and unpredictable. Monolithi: Complete unification of all healthcare facilities into a single institution with multiple campuses by standardizing the entire business. This however is tested and will cost approximately $500 Billion - $1 Trillion – potential to increase 3-5 times cost. The following systems will be evaluated by the following criteria: 1. Flexibility 2. Scalability 3. Cost 4. Efficiency 5.
To: Max Berndt, CEO Peachtree Healthcare
From: Services Consultant
Date: September 24, 2013
Peachtree’s vision is to ensure a quality, consistent and continuity of care across the entire network of care facilities but to deliver all of this at the highest levels of efficiency, economy, and respect for patients and staff. In order to be competitive in the health industry, Peachtree has obtained a number of varying health institutes via mergers. The concern is the instability of the information system as new facilities are acquired because the system of each institute is kept in service. This is creating a patchwork of incompatible and disconnected systems with the following concerns: • Inefficiencies of the company processes and procedures. • Inability for a continuation of care to flow between the various medical facilities. • Instability of the system itself has the potential of disrupting the care of its patients, and • The system is not economical because of the wasted energy and time on the current system. There is little time to implement a system because of the increasing instability of the system that can have an affect on patient care. The following alternatives are outlined in this analysis of Peachtree: Service-oriented Architecture (SOA): Flexible with selective standardization but implemented in stages to decrease the risk of failure. There is a potential deal with the vendor but that is because of it is new to the industry and unpredictable. Monolithi: Complete unification of all healthcare facilities into a single institution with multiple campuses by standardizing the entire business. This however is tested and will cost approximately $500 Billion - $1 Trillion – potential to increase 3-5 times cost. The following systems will be evaluated by the following criteria: 1. Flexibility 2. Scalability 3. Cost 4. Efficiency 5.