In his novel1984, George Orwell imagined a future world where speech was greatly restricted.
He called that the language that the totalitarian state in his novel created “Newspeak”, and it bears a striking resemblance to the political correctness that we see in America right now.
According to Wikipedia, Newspeak is “a reduced language created by the totalitarian state as a tool to limit free thought, and concepts that pose a threat to the regime such as freedom, self-expression, individuality, peace, etc. Any form of thought alternative to the party’s construct is classified as ‘thoughtcrime.’”
Yes, people are not usually being hauled off to prison for what they are saying just yet, but we are heading down that path.
Every single day, the mainstream media in the United States bombards us with subtle messages about what we should believe and what “appropriate speech” consists of.
Most of the time, most Americans quietly fall in line with this unwritten speech code.
In fact, most of the time we enforce this unwritten speech code among each other. Those that would dare to buck the system are finding out that the consequences can be rather severe.
The following are 19 shocking examples of how political correctness is destroying America…
#1 The Missouri State Fair has permanently banned a rodeo clown from performing just because he wore an Obama mask, and now all of the other rodeo clowns are being required to take “sensitivity training“…
But the state commission went further, saying it will require that before the Rodeo Cowboy Association can take part in any future state fair, “they must provide evidence to the director of the Missouri State Fair that they have proof that all officials and subcontractors of the MRCA have successfully participated in sensitivity training.”
#2 Government workers in Seattle have been told that they should no longer use the words “citizen” and “brown bag” because they are potentially offensive.
#3 A Florida police officer recently lost his job for calling Trayvon Martin a “thug” on Facebook.
#4 “Climate change deniers” are definitely not wanted at the U.S. Department of the Interior. Interior Secretary Sally Jewell was recently quoted as making the following statement: “I hope there are no climate-change deniers in the Department of Interior”.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
II. The District Court erred in disregarding Mason County District Attorney’s Office involvement with respect to the firing of Mr. Brady, an independent contractor, who was fired in retaliation to his comments criticizing the Mason County District Attorney’s Immigration policy, and in concluding that the Pickering test only protects full-time government employees.…
- 863 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
This is the major question that arises. I believe that everyone knows that speech is protected under the…
- 663 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Newspeak is a new form of language, one that had been perfected by the government and is used by Party members.…
- 1037 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Deciduous forests are closer to the equator than the coniferous forests of the tiaga, and so they have a longer growing season. This gives the plants more time to produce food, and the forest yields about 6000 Kilocalories per square meter per year for animals to eat. These primary producers form the first trophic level. The trees in the deciduous forest shed their leaves in winter. This prevents their branches from being broken by the weight of the snow, but also means that they have to grow leaves anew each spring. The trees and shrubs produce flowers, seeds, and fruits, such as wild cherries and persimmons. Many of the shrubs beneath the trees also produce fruit, such as huckleberries, blackberries, and thimbleberries. Below the shrubs there are wild flowers, clumps of grasses, and ferns. Herbivores eat the leaves and fruits of the forest. Some of the animals that live in coniferous forests also live here. Squirrels, small rodents, and deer find food in the deciduous forest, and other plant eaters, including many birds and insects, are also members of the community of primary consumers. These animals are on the second trophic level. These animals can use the 6000 Kilocalories per square meters per year produced by the plants, but the most of this energy is used up in the processes of living, such as breathing, circulating the blood, growth, and reproduction. Only about one tenth of the energy is stored in the bodies of the herbivores, so animals eating these herbivores can only get 600 Kilocalories per square meters per year from their bodies. The small carnivores, the secondary consumers, form the third trophic level. Many of these animals, such as woodpeckers and skunks, eat insects, while others, such as racoons, foxes, and snakes, eat the small rodents and frogs. The small carnivores have 600 kilocalories per square kilometer per year to eat, but, again, nine tenths of these Kilocalories are used up in keeping the animals alive. The bodies of the secondary…
- 1155 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
“Free speech is not to be regulated. The audience that hissed yesterday may applaud today, even for the same performance.” –Michael Douglas…
- 937 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Despite the fact that the First Amendment protects offensive speech, the Supreme Court has created a category of unprotected speech that consists of “fighting words.” In Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, the Court defined fighting words as “words which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of peace.” The Court established that in order for the speaker's speech to fall under the fighting words doctrine the speech must be directed to an individual face-to-face and the words must have a tendency to cause the average person to respond with an immediate violent action. Fighting words are not subject to First Amendment protection because they don’t convey ideas and are not of social value.…
- 118 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
We the people, may speak in any manner appearing satisfactory to needs and wants due to our possession of the freedom of speech. Although this statement may portray itself as accurate and truthful; in fact, the entire idea feeds from common misconceptions. A vast measure of Americans hold dearly to a distant from reality view on the rights and freedoms delivered to new generations as an invaluable heirloom. The uninhibited freedom to speak falls prey to limitations bound by diction chosen to define its mechanics encompassing intended capabilities. Therefore, when Americans begin ranting with ideas ranging from brilliant philosophies to lunatic conspiracies through the facade of entirely free speech, numerous times the results prove unbecoming…
- 1325 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
As American Citizens our freedom of speech is protected by the Constitution’s first Amendment which “guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition…” (Cornell Law 2017), but that doesn’t or shouldn’t give anyone the right to cause harm or violence against another person or group of people if we do not agree or share the same beliefs. The laws were created to protect us, but many people interpret the laws differently and therefore, feel entitled to speak freely even if it causes…
- 519 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There are people in this world that do abuse our freedom of speech, like Carter says. Many children (and adults) cuss severely on a day to day basis, and need to understand that language is a key…
- 841 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Political correctness meant to unify the country, but it doesn’t. It corrupts the minds of the people, it changes how college education should be, it makes it difficult for businesses to keep customers, and it’s trying to erase history. This society has become too concerned with how other people feel, or how a comment or gesture offended them. As a society, people need to realize that not everyone is going to feel the same way as they do, but that shouldn’t offend them. Opinions are great, people should get to express how they truly feel, and not have to worry about getting shunned for it. America has become too politically correct, but that doesn’t mean this society has to stay that…
- 1907 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The 1st amendment, probably the easiest to follow is being silently fought. Now it may not be illegal to say something but by the time you say it you might have wished it was. People are beat to a bloody pulp because their opinion of the president, or even worse their favorite sports team. What has this nation come to when we beat a living person to a bloody pulp for the sports team that they like! I think we need to take a step back and look at ourselves for a second.…
- 1245 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
“If we do not believe in freedom of speech for those we despise, then we do not believe in it at all.” - Noam Chomsky…
- 1868 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Speech codes, with all of their formal clauses, are in fact a parody of the rule of law, but we should not obsess about them. Freedom dies in the heart and will before it dies in the law. Speech codes merely formalize the will to censor and to devalue liberty of thought and speech. Even without invoking codes, universities have found ways to silence or to chill freedom of opinion and expression (Kors).…
- 1668 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Arguably, the majority of Americans can agree on the idea that America is one of the most politically correct countries in the world. No other country in the world spends more time and more money on ensuring that its people are happy with every little minute detail that they could construe as rude or insensitive. Not even countries like Australia, who’s Prime Minister appeared on national television told his countryman that in Australia the language that all road signs and television channels will be English; and if anyone had a problem with that then they could excuse themselves from the country. For all of America’s interest in public affairs one major problem has seemed to slip through the cracks. Whether it’s because people don’t know or whether people just don’t care, no one seems to be talking about solitary confinement.…
- 3661 Words
- 15 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Universities are considering adopting speech codes that would put a ban on offensive, demeaning, and provoking speech. The developments of these speech codes are not necessary. Sheltering students from speech that might offend them is patronizing to say the least. Do college officials really believe the students are too weak to live with the Bill of Rights? The fact of the matter is that speech codes on college campuses are threatening students’ freedom of speech and the free exchange of ideas and therefore have no place in higher education.…
- 2747 Words
- 11 Pages
Best Essays