Responce to Jean-Paul Sartre's Lies: "Who Can Give an Answer to That a Priori? No One. nor Is It Given in Any Ethical Scripture."
Sartre’s essay: “Existentialism Is a Humanism” > check http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/sartre/works/exist/sartre.htm for the full Essay.
In it Sartre says: “His mother was living alone with him, deeply afflicted by the semi-treason of his father and by the death of her eldest son, and her one consolation was in this young man. But he, at this moment, had the choice between going to England to join the Free French Forces or of staying near his mother and helping her to live… Which is the more useful aim, the general one of fighting in and for the whole community, or the precise aim of helping one particular person to live? Who can give an answer to that a priori? No one. Nor is it given in any ethical scripture.”
I am here to prove that Sartre's ideologies are crushed by the Islamic Monotheist perspective, and while it was neglected during his era, now the gradual success of his ideological planning prediction of “we shall have disposed of God as an out-of-date hypothesis which will die away quietly of itself” (Sartre), and as this ideology stripped France from its Christian coating to a secular nationalistic one, the Islamic ideology crushes out the French ground with no control by its same indigenous minds to the degree the secular French government banned Islamic religious freedom in particular in a coward response .
The crushing response to his mediocre minded lying “for the act of lying implies the universal value which it denies”(Sartre) from what he mentioned as quoted above is as follow:
It was narrated that Mu’awiyah bin Jahimah As-Sulaimi said:
“I came to the Messenger of Allah (Peace be Upon Him) and said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, I want to go for Jihad with you, seeking thereby the Face of Allah and the Hereafter.’ He said: ‘Woe to you! Is your mother still alive?’ I said: ‘Yes.’ He said: ‘Go back and honor her.’ Then I approached him from the other side and said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, I want to go for Jihad
In it Sartre says: “His mother was living alone with him, deeply afflicted by the semi-treason of his father and by the death of her eldest son, and her one consolation was in this young man. But he, at this moment, had the choice between going to England to join the Free French Forces or of staying near his mother and helping her to live… Which is the more useful aim, the general one of fighting in and for the whole community, or the precise aim of helping one particular person to live? Who can give an answer to that a priori? No one. Nor is it given in any ethical scripture.”
I am here to prove that Sartre's ideologies are crushed by the Islamic Monotheist perspective, and while it was neglected during his era, now the gradual success of his ideological planning prediction of “we shall have disposed of God as an out-of-date hypothesis which will die away quietly of itself” (Sartre), and as this ideology stripped France from its Christian coating to a secular nationalistic one, the Islamic ideology crushes out the French ground with no control by its same indigenous minds to the degree the secular French government banned Islamic religious freedom in particular in a coward response .
The crushing response to his mediocre minded lying “for the act of lying implies the universal value which it denies”(Sartre) from what he mentioned as quoted above is as follow:
It was narrated that Mu’awiyah bin Jahimah As-Sulaimi said:
“I came to the Messenger of Allah (Peace be Upon Him) and said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, I want to go for Jihad with you, seeking thereby the Face of Allah and the Hereafter.’ He said: ‘Woe to you! Is your mother still alive?’ I said: ‘Yes.’ He said: ‘Go back and honor her.’ Then I approached him from the other side and said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, I want to go for Jihad