In A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens, Madame Defarge knits a registry of all the people who are against her and the revolution. As Madame Defarge adds names to the registry the Jacques or revolutionaries…
Next, forced change in “A Tale of Two Cities” is also showed in different ways. It is shown in one example when Madame Defarge’s sister is raped, and a more cruel side of her is shown. “I care nothing for this Doctor, I. He may wear his head or lose it, for any interest I have in him; it is all one to me. But, the Evrémonde people are to be exterminated, and the wife…
Near the end of the novel, Madame Defarge goes to Lucie’s house with a plan to denounce her for mourning Charles Darnay’s impending death. Madame Defarge is portrayed as a strong, stubborn, and ruthless woman. She will go to any lengths to avenge the…
Madame Defarge de-humanize’s herself. Others describe her as an animal, she is thinking “It was nothing to her, that an innocent man was to die for the sins of his forefathers; she saw, not him, but them. It was nothing to her, that his wife was to be made a widow, and his daughter an orphan; that was insufficient punishment, because they were her natural enemies and her prey, and as such had no right to live,” (Darnay 359). This animal was no longer considered any bit of a human. She was the predator, the Evrémonde her prey.…
The Evermonde brother’s inhumanity towards Madame Defarge’s family is observed through Dr. Manette’s journal when it is read at Charles Darnay’s last trial. The Evermonde brothers show no respect towards the peasants who served them. The Marquis describes the young peasant boy as “’A crazed young common dog! A serf!”’(251). The two brothers not only think of their peasants as dogs, but they treated them with great cruelty that is incomprehensible. An example of their extreme mistreatment of the peasants is when the younger Evermonde brother found himself in a duel with the young peasant boy and he eventually dies from his battle wound, described in the novel by Dr. Manette, “’I could not see where his wound was, as I kneeled on one knee over him; but, I could see that he was dying of a wound from a sharp point”’(251). The Evermonde brothers kill Madame Defarge’s sister, her brother-in-law, her father, and her younger brother. The mistreatment of her family leaves Madame Defarge with a craving for revenge on the Evermonde family. Not only does she want to kill the Marquis, but she also wants to kill “’The château and all the race’”(231), which includes Charles Darnay, Lucie, and little Lucie. Madame Defarge has no sense of her level of inhumanity towards the Evermonde family, but only desires to avenge the deaths of her family, leading to her…
Darnay’s return to “The Loadstone Rock” is a fulfillment of fate due to the fact that he’ll be considered a noble and treated this way. Darnay is considered a noble, because he is “the nephew of the Monsieur the Marquis, for whom Gaspard was exalted to that height of so many feet” (142). How Darnay will be treated is hinted at by behaviors of revolutionary leaders, Madame Defarge and Jacques Three, who demonstrate their heartlessness, potential for cruelty, and ruthlessness towards other nobles. Madame Defarge is “immoveable” in the sense that she is an under the radar strong leader and person, especially, when she whips the women up into a frenzy during the storming of the Bastille and when “the…
The main purpose of this book is to show the contrasts between the peaceful city of London and the city of Paris, tearing itself apart in revolution. This is apparent in the very first line of the book, "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times...." This is a contrast of the two cities, London, the tranquil home of Mr. Lorry and the Darnays'; and Paris, the center of a bloody revolution. The author shows gentleness in these violent times in the persons of Dr. and Lucie Mannette, both gentle and peaceful. He also characterizes the evil side of the revolution in the apathetic and depraved Misuser and Mademoiselle Defarge, who go about their business while death carts roll-- as do heads-- through the streets of Paris. He does though, depict a ray of light amongst all this evil; the heroic Carton, who gave his life for his friend and a woman he knew he would never have. The biggest contrast of all, is in the person of Misuser Darnay, the gentle English family man, who is also related to the evil Marquis Evremonde. I personally like stories that use historical events as backdrops because it brings these seemingly distant events closer to us. This book definitely offers insight into life in the two cities at the time of the French Revolution. I think it does an excellent job of depicting just how totally involved some people became in the revolution. It shows how people were blinded by the desire for freedom from their former oppressors, so much so, that they attacked anyone and anything that was even remotely related to their past rulers. I think this was effectively done by excellent characterization, using each character to depict a different aspect of society, then contrasting them by making them rivals. I really took away a different view of that time period. Some of the language he used was definitely outdated. The language was exactly what you would expect for a novel of that time period. I was able to follow the story pretty well, although there were a…
When the Marquis kills the child with his carriage, Madame Defarge stands there, knitting; looking him in the face when no one else dared to raise an eye. “…that not a voice, or a hand, or even an eye was raised. But the woman who stood knitting looked up steadily, and looked the Marquis in the face.” Madame Defarge looks the Marquis in the face because he is an Evermonde, or one of the brothers that hurt her family.…
There are many memorable villains in literature, and Charles Dickens’ Madame Defarge is one of them. Being Dickens’ notorious villain, Madame Defarge remembers, knits and executes those who are dislikable with her allies. In A Tale of Two Cities, Madame Defarge is the antagonist who is willing to obliterate the aristocracy because of her past. Madame Defarge knits a register to target members of the aristocracy. But because of the aristocracy she is cold and becomes a “monster”.…
Madame Defarge will stop at nothing to see the French nobility suffer and, although she is not very educated, she is extremely clever. The plan devised to knit the names of the condemned into the register shows just how bright this woman actually is. She sits with her fatal knitting needles in hand seeing all, and she documents everything “in her own stitches and her own symbols, [which] will always be as plain to her as the sun” (Dickens 174). Nothing escapes Madame Defarge’s watchful eye, and everything she does ensures that she gets one step closer to the revolution and her revenge. She knits seemingly irrelevant pieces of information into her register and uses it against her enemies to enact her revenge. To outsiders Madame Defarge comes across as the innocent wife of a wine shop keeper, but in reality this extreme revolutionary would not blink an eye before she sawed off the head of an aristocrat. Truthfully, if Ms. Pross had not put an end to her personal reign of terror, Madame Defarge would not have ceased until every last aristocrat was exterminated.…
Madame Defarge, the cruel leader of the revolutionaries, is the epitome of darkness. She is ruthless and kills without thought, for the shadow of her past motivates her to create a change in the class structure of France. Later in the novel, it is revealed that Madame Defarge’s family was killed by the aristocracy, so by killing the current aristocracy, she believe she will avenge their death of her siblings. The narrator says, “The shadow of the manner of these Defarges was dark upon himself, for all that, and in his secret mind it troubled him greatly” (278). Mr. Lorry, a friend of the Manette’s, meets Madame Defarge and unconsciously sees her as dangerous, but he doesn’t know why he feels that way.…
He provides much intuition and insight in the counteracting forces within the novel, displaying a new depth of how it played a role in the novel as a whole. He gives substantial support by use of various connections and textual evidence. Most notably, Hamilton chooses to embody light and darkness through the characters of Lucie Manette and Madame Defarge, which differs greatly to Robert Alter’s interpretation. Symbolically, he exemplifies their vast differences, yet ultimate likeness to the countries of France and England. JF Hamilton offers extensive description of Manette and Defarge to uphold his claim. He furnishes parallels and key differences in the comparison between both characters, strengthening his position. He associates many commonalities between the characters, such as their transcending roles and expectations as females, as well as their drive for moral completion. Hamilton as well provides very analytical comparison, distinguishing Lucie Manette's’ representation of light, warmth, and spirituality to Madame Defarge’s demonic and apocalyptic portrayal. He incorporates symbolism to demonstrate the complex yet formidable relationship between Defarge and Manette to add a new depth of interpretation. This is evident through the effective incorporation of symbolic disconnection between weaving and knitting. Weaving, which corresponds to Lucie Manette, demonstrates salvation and virtue, whereas knitting respectively exhibits Defarge and her satanic and unforgiving…
Throughout the novel, Madame Defarge makes it obvious she has a hidden motive. She has a constant quest to disrupt the lives of Darnay and the Manettes. Madame Defarge is one of the three who accuses Darnay, sending him to prison again. She wants him put to death and she wants to catch Lucie illegally mourning a prisoner.…
Madame Defarge is a character in Charles Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities that will live forever in the reader’s memory due to her desire for revolution and thirst for vengeance. Madame Defarge is so driven for vengeance over the Evremonde family and the French aristocrats that have wronged the poor citizens in France. One reason Madame Defarge will always always stay in the mind of the reader is how Madame records people’s names, descriptions, and history in her knitting. The author writes “It would be easier for the weakest poltroon that lives to erase himself from existence, than to erase one letter of his name or crimes from the knitted register of Madame Defarge”(161). The author uses this to show the reader how smart and organized Madame Defarge is at keeping information secret while still having it out in the open for her to see.…
Every story in the history of literature has one or more characters that are not as significant as other characters. Although these characters aren't as important, they serve to advance the plot or are symbolically important. There are definitely numerous depictions of these characters in A Tale of Two Cities, by Charles Dickens. Two examples are Lucie Manette Darnay and Miss Pross. Both of these flat characters are important in the development of the story.…