Preview

Smith vs. Marx - a Comparison Essay Example

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1263 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Smith vs. Marx - a Comparison Essay Example
Smith versus Marx – A Comparison
S. Glen Balanoff
July 04, 2004

Smith versus Marx – A Comparison
Modern economic society can be described as a combination of certain points from several theories combined into one. Changing dynamics and economic needs of nations has spawned a development of various, and contrasting, economic systems throughout the world. Perhaps the two most contrasting philosophies seen in existence today are that of capitalism and communism. The two philosophers most notably recognized for their views on these economic systems are Adam Smith and Karl Marx. This paper will identify several fundamental aspects of economic philosophy as described by Smith and Marx, and will compare and contrast the views of these philosophers in relation to current global economic systems.
Adam Smith was the first of the two philosophers to reign on the economic world. Smith rose to prominence with the publishing of two controversial works: The Theory of Moral Sentiments in 1759 and The Wealth of Nations in 1776 (Heilbroner, 1999). It was the publication of The Wealth of Nations in 1776 that launched Smith as a visionary philosopher of economic theory, and the father of the free market system employed by many nations today. Smith posed a fundamental approach that economics is a community concern (Armour, 1997).
Karl Marx shocked the world with his own publication, The Manifesto in 1848, which sharply contradicted the visions of Smith and the emergence of the Industrial Revolution (Heilbroner, 1999). Marx concepts of unification without social class for the good of all people were communicated and the birth of communism was realized. Unlike Smith, who believed that the division of labor increased productivity, Marx believed that labor becomes a commodity and power rested in the hands of those who controlled production (Armor, 1997). Marx believed that the pending Industrial Revolution would create havoc and confusion to the capitalists' society

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    The Communist Manifesto, published in 1848, was one of the most influential texts of the 19th century. In brief, it outlines how all of human development has been forms of class struggles, first with the feudal lord and peasant, and in later years the bourgeoisie and proletariat. According to Marx, the final stage of the development of society is rebellion of the working class. It is inevitable that the laborers will come to rule themselves and overthrow the capitalists. Capitalism is heavily attacked by Marx; he describes the system as exploitative, cruel, unjust, and therefore destined to be overthrown. Through the manifesto, Marx works to call the workers together to gain control of their future, as he believes they must.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx Vs Adam Smith

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Older than Karl Marx, Smith studied at the University of Glasgow in Scotland. He then continued his education at Balliol College at Oxford, studying moral philosophy as well as Latin, history, and English. (Biography, 2). Smith then continued on to become a professor of economics and philosophy, and is best known for his 1776 Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. This book was created in order to show his beliefs on how economies should be run as a best-case scenario in his opinion. This book was widely used as a basis for future economists’ theorem, including Karl Marx, and also helped to accredit Smith with the title of father of modern economics. Prior to writing the book that made him the figurehead for modern economics, Smith wrote a lesser known book in 1759 on the psychological side of economic theory. In this book, Theory of Moral Sentiments, Smith projected the ideas he believed in terms of how emotions could affect the individuals in the economy, and to a lesser extent, the economy as a whole through the actions of the individual. These ideas included the concept of two different types of moral values, which could be used to benefit the individual in the economy. These values could be used for what Smith called both “noble” and “commercial” use. When looking at the commercial aspect to his theory, Smith wanted them to be used within business,…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Adam Smith and Karl Marx are both considered few of the most influential giants in social and economical history. When viewing their economical standpoints, it is not difficult to recognize the difference in ideas that they have regarding society. Adam Smith is an advocator for capitalism and the wealth that can be accumulated in it, while Karl Marx critiques on the flaws of capitalism and praises communism that will overthrow the capitalist society. However, both of them base their theories on the characteristic of labor. Even though Marx and Smith both point to the significance of one's labor in a capitalist society, Smith views labor as having the potential, in conjunction with the division of labor, to stimulate the public wealth and encourage the growth of an ultimately unregulated opulent commercial society. Marx, while starting at a conceptually similar point, observes that in a capitalist system people cannot acquire the wealth produced by their labor due to the alienation between the laborer and his/her means of production. The result of this alienation is exponential division of wealth between the rich bourgeois and the deprived proletariat, leading to revolution in the capitalist economy.…

    • 1710 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adam Smith was a Scottish moral philosopher, known for his view and use of capitalism. Smith helped spread the ideology of privatization and free market, and is often credited on creating modern economics. Smith opposed government use and regulation in trade and consumption, arguing it was only a producer and consumers business. Smith lived in an era of mercantilism, and found it useless and unhelpful for trade, and illogical for only benefitting two countries. Smith found specialization key; the idea that a country should keep sacred to what they could produce well and set that good specifically up for trade.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx claims that this is and exploitation of the worker, and that the worker is the only commodity that produces more value than it is worth. Marx refuses to accept that there is a harmony of interests between the worker and the employer in Capitalism. Marx again attempts to point out a flaw in Capitalism stating, that there is no long term stability or equilibrium, and that it is just an economy of boom and bust. Smith on the other hand argues that a free market economy (Capitalism) leads to economic well being. Smith believed that the main cause of prosperity in a nation was the division of labor.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were both known for their distinct theoretical contributions. Adam Smith proposed that there should be a free market where the producers are free to produce as much as they want and charge buyers the prices that they want. He thought that this would result in the most efficient and desirable economic outcome for consumers and producers. This meant that the consumers would only pay as much or less than they would value the benefit from the good, and the producer would only sell for as much as or higher than they would have spent on making the product. The market would always be equilibrium. There would only be a limited role for the government in the economic system. Karl Marx disagreed and thought that workers would have an advantage because they are already rich and there would be a disadvantage to the poor. The rich would only get richer and the poor would only get poorer. He came out with a theory called the labor theory of value. The claims that the value of a good or service is directly connected to the amount of labor required for its production. Marx thought that the two classes in society, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, will remain stuck in their respective classes because of the very nature of capitalism. The wealthy bourgeoisie owns the factories and also dominates the media, universities, government, bureaucracy, and hence. Their position on the social status is unchangeable. The poor proletariat are only able to work hard. Marx thought that to fix this problem; the poor would have to revolt and create a new social order where there would be no distinction between segments of society. Adam Smith thought that capitalism was the most ideal economic system. Adam also opposed the idea of revolution to restore justice for the masses because he valued order and stability over relief and oppression. Marx thought that capitalism would lead to instability and injustice in a society. Marx…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Adam Smith was a moral philosopher who established a baseline for all contemporary discussions on how wealth is amassed and what the effects are on society. Adam Smith knew that in the late eighteenth century for many people, they worked for wages that would barely enable them to survive. Since his focus was on the economics of the city in relation to that of the countryside, Mr. Smith did not make any comments on international trade. Smith went as far to say that people would do more good if they were not set out to do so. On another hand, Mr. Smith made an observation that when a political system was dominated by business interests the needs of the public may be ignored in the rush to use the political system to make money other than better…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adam Smith was the first major capitalist philosopher to praise free market economy and no government involvement in the economy. Smith was an 18th century philosopher whose beliefs led to some of our modern day theories; his work marks the breakthrough of an approach which has progressively displaced the stationary Aristotelian view. His most famous book is An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, which was written in 1776.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    West, E (1990) Adam Smith 's Revolution, Past and Present. Adam Smith 's Legacy: His…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the figures of the intellectual movement known as the Scottish Enlightenment, he is known primarily as the author of two treatises: The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759), and An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776). Smith is also known for his explanation of how rational self-interest and competition can lead to economic well-being and prosperity. His work also helped to create the modern academic discipline of economics and provided one of the best–known rationales for free trade and…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the feudal system in Europe began crumbling with the dawn of the Industrial Revolution a void was created in the European social and economic structure, Scottish philosopher Adam Smith took it upon himself to fill this void and in 1776 published The Wealth of Nations; just as Newtons Principia Mathematica laid the foundation for modern physics so to did Adams work lay the foundation for modern economics. For the next 70 years Adams doctrine went unchallenged until Karl Marx presented his rebuttal in the Communist Manifesto.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adam Smith expanded the ideas of social order and the individual incentives for actions into the foundation of modern economic theory. Economics is the study of markets, and Adam Smith’s work pulls sociological functions of individuals and groups. Smith then applies them to markets. In his book, "The Wealth of Nations", Smith formulates the theory that free market economics through the pursuit of self-interest impacts the nature of social order by the division of labor, and societies acting cooperatively.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Reputed to be the father of “The Classical School” of economics, the Scottish born Adam Smith (1772-1790) was a supply side economist. “He attributed economic expansion to expanding production and trade with expanding demand as a by-product and consequence”(Jacobs, J 1985 p12) He promoted the invisible hand of free enterprise, which showed that individuals in pursuing their own selfish interest could benefit society. In other words, if people wish to sell, they must produce what others require at a price that they are prepared to pay. (Palmer. N, 1990). He also advocated the “Laissez-faire” approach, which means that the government should only get involved in the economy in order to raise monies for the upkeep of infrastructure, to sustain the legal system and to defend the country. In Smith’s book ‘An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations’ which was published in 1776, he covered the previous two concepts as well as the division of labour and the function of markets. Division of labour was not a new idea but Smith believed it to be very important as a way of increasing wealth. According to Delaney, Smith established the 4…

    • 2179 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Csr Csv

    • 5103 Words
    • 21 Pages

    In the late 18th century a Scottish philosopher and economist named Adam Smith wrote numerous articles on these subjects, his magnum opus being The Wealth of Nations in which he espoused the concepts of free trade and the free market on which the classic market economy was based.…

    • 5103 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Theories of Management

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages

    | Adam Smith was a Scottish moral philosopher and political economist who is one of the fathers of modern economics. In 1759, while a professor at Glasgow University, he published The Theoryof Moral Sentiments, the work that established his academic reputation. After leaving Glasgow, Smith devoted much of his time to producing his second major work, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, which was published in 1776. His two great works focussed on observing and explaining society. In The Theory of Moral Sentiment.. The book was an explanation of human nature and of the organisation of society. The central theme of The Wealth of Nations is the division…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays