In the 17th century to the 19th century, social system had dominated England. Land ownership and lineage determined people’s class ranking (high and low class). They lacked a middle-class until the 1800s.…
While the Industrial Revolution had both positive and negative effects on society and the economy, the positive effects outweighed the negative. The revolution had strengthened the British economy due to rapid developments in the textile industry and steam power, it also caused cities to grow tremendously. Yet because of the quick rapid growth, living conditions and public health were less than adequate. It is clear that living in the industrial revolution time as a lower class citizen would have been close to hell, but in the end when weighing the pros and cons of the revolution, one could understand the long term effect was a positive one.…
Social classes in the Elizabethan era were quite different than those we have today. These days we have a few generic classes that everyone gets grouped into. Back then, there were many diverse classes that you were basically born into. During this period, the main classes that people were separated into were The Monarch, Nobility, Gentry, Merchant, Yeomanry, and Laborers.…
In the late 1700s, The Industrial Revolution began in England, which had an immense range of negative and positive effects on the social and also economic life of the people in England. The results have been looked at form many different point of views, including the factory workers themselves, the factory owners, the government, and others who looked upon the conditions in the industrial cities at the time. This essay will evaluate the positive and negative effects of the Industrial Revolution.…
During the mid 〖19〗^th century, children under the age of 15 comprised more than 20% of the workforce in Britain’s textile industry, and rights insuring proper child benefits were unseen until the early 〖20〗^th century. Furthermore, due to the intensifying urbanization, labourers often resided in vastly overpopulated residential areas in which disease and despicable living conditions were part of a truly dubious existence . My analysis will primarily cover the era’s societal tendencies, and how these precipitated a prodigious and ever-increscent socioeconomic chasm between the established social classes. In this attempt, I covet to address the repercussions and importance of the prospering Laissez-faire mentality that accomplished both tremendous advancement and great calamity for those born into…
The middle class’s attitude towards labor was not as strong as the working class’s attitude towards their own work. This is most likely because the working class had many more jobs to do than the middle class. Workers described their occupations as grueling and tiresome due to their long laborious hours. Even family could not provide relief due to their own fatigue (Doc 7). It came to a point where the vocation began to sicken the employees. Some become sick, anemic, or dizzy as a result of all the effort (Doc 9). Some of the poor children suffered from the burden of overworking with little play (Doc 8). Others may believe that the labor did not affect the children too much, but it clearly shows the pain they felt. On the other hand, the middle class never had to endure the terrible feelings of exhaustion. They tended to feel a sense of disgust towards work. It is as if they were perfect role models who performed with great effort and the working class was just lazy and always getting into trouble (Doc 1). But their attitude towards their work is close to nothing compared to their feelings towards each other.…
The Elizabethan age was significant because religion, politics, fashion, government, and literature played a major role in the lives of the people. The life during this time period was not only very different, but also quite interesting. During the past two hundred years, the Elizabethan age received a great deal of attention.…
* Victorian views on morality and culture coupled with need to make decisions about mountain of domestic products had subtle but important effect on middle class expectations about women’s roles at…
In the late 1700’s, the Industrial Revolution began in England creating both positive and negative effects on both the economic and social life of the people in England. The results of these effects have been taken in by numerous perspectives such as people who worked in factories, the factory owners themselves, the government and others who have witnessed the conditions in the cities at the time of the Industrial Revolution.…
When one considers the effect that the Industrial Revolutions of the 19th and early 20th century, the workers whose backs bore it are seldom reflected upon. It becomes ponderous whether the revolution was a boon or a malediction upon the working class and if they were truly aided by the great rise in standard of living that hallmarked this time. Those who would defend the period would cite pre-Industrialization scenarios, toiling under feudal lords with no future beyond death and an unmarked grave. An opponent of this idea, such as the renowned Karl Marx, would state, 'The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, and new forms of struggle in place of the old ones.…
The context is vital during this period as British output doubled twice in the 19th century between 1830-1852 and 1852-80 which fundamentally changed Britain in a number of ways, before the revolution its estimated ¾ of the population lived in rural parts. Working longer for less in factories and higher living costs in an increasing urban country left many with very little. The relentless path that factory owners were able to take due to the government’s laissez-faire attitude led to another social change the breakdown of family life, safety was not an issue only profit, women and children worked hard and for little income. It is also argued that England was the world’s first urban nation, and urbanization meant that the majority of people lived in urban areas according to the consensus of 1861, an inevitable factor in a growing power. The aspects that caused panic- and/or ‘moral panic’- are also an important aspect as well as what led to the reactions of politicians and how the public reacted to youth, which could often be a product of journalism at the time. It should also be explained there was no distinct youth pre 1850’s, children entered…
Throughout history, a divide has always existed between the rich and poor in society. However, during the Industrial Revolution in Victorian England, this rift reached its peak. The working class labored for long hours and received miniscule wages, whereas the bourgeoisie grew abundantly wealthy through the labor of the working class. Published in 1848 and 1854 respectively, Karl Marx’s The Communist Manifesto and Charles Dickens’ Hard Times both comment on these troubles. While Hard Times is a novel which tells a story and The Communist Manifesto is a short publication which tries to bring about social change, both writings offer a sharp critique of the class antagonism brought about by capitalism at the height of the Industrial Revolution.…
Victorian Britain was in almost all ways a period of oppression and exploration of women. Women in Britain during the Victorian age were seen largely as second class citizens in a so called “man’s worlds.” Women lacked the right to vote and the own property and inherit money once they were married, and where seen as the property of their husband to do almost anything that they so pleased. Though there are many reasons for why we can see that Victorian Britain was a time of exploration for women, in this essay the main points that will be focused on will be, women in the workplace, the role of women in marriage and the view that society had on women and their role within society. After looking at these points one will clearly see that Victorian Britain was a period of oppression and exploration of women.…
the best of toys, clothes and education and it was absurd to even consider the…
As members of the gentry, the Earnshaws and the Lintons occupy a somewhat unwarranted place in the classification of late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century British society. At the top of British society is the royalty, followed by the aristocracy, the gentry, and then the lower classes which made up the vast majority of the population. Although the gentry, or upper middle class, possessed servants and often large estates, they held a nonetheless fragile social position. The social status of aristocracy was a formal and settled matter, because aristocracy had official titles. Members of the gentry, however, held no titles, and their status was subject to change. A man might see himself as a gentleman but find, to his embarrassment, that others did not share his view. In the dissection of whether or not a man was really a gentleman, one would consider how much land he owned, how many tenants and servants he had, how he spoke, whether he kept horses and a carriage, and whether his money came from land or “trade”—gentlemen scorned banking and commercial activities.…