• Power: Ability of an individual or group to impose its will on others, even if they resist
• Authority: Power widely viewed as legitimate
• Authorities: People who occupy command posts of legitimized power structures*
• The power of a group may be widely recognized as legitimate or valid under some
• Social movements: collective attempts to change part or all of the social order
• Political Parties: organizations that seek to control state power to achieve their aims.
Two types of Politics
1. “Normal politics”: When authorities are firmly in power
2. “Politics beyond rules”: When legitimate authority grows weak*
Power From Above Normal Politics:
• The state: Set of institutions that formulate and carry out a country’s laws, policies, and binding
resolutions
• The state’s power is “ultimate” because its authority stands above all others
• Furthermore, if the state needs to use force to maintain order or protect its borders, most
people will regard its actions as legitimate
• In normal politics, ultimate seat of power is the state (state power widely recognized as
legitimate)
• State also is authorized to use force (coercive power) if necessary
• But use of force by authorities is sign of state’s weakness (should not need force to impose will)
*
• In democratic countries like Canada, the government is formed by elected members of the
political party that wins most seats in a general election
• Government initiates policies, proposes laws, and enforces both
• The government is referred to as the executive branch*
Civil Society:
• Individuals in civil society (private sphere of life) also exercise control over the state through
variety of organizations and institutions, including:
Social movements, mass media, pressure groups or “lobbies”, political parties
circumstances; if it is, raw power becomes legitimate authority
social movements can influence the state by rioting, petitioning, striking, demonstrating, and
establish pressure groups, unions and political parties to achieve their aims
The mass media are supposed to keep a watchful and critical eye on the state and help keep the
public informed about the quality of government
Pressure groups or “lobbies” are formed by trade unions, manufacturers’ associations, ethnic
groups, and other organizations to advise politicians of their members’ desires; lobbies also
remind politicians how much their members’ votes and campaign contributions matter
Five Sociological theories of democracy:
1. Pluralist theory: Argues normal democratic politics is characterized by compromise and
accommodation of all group interests
According to pluralists, we live in a heterogeneous society with many competing interests and
centres of power; in a democracy no one social group controls the state because there are
competing interests in civil society and different groups win political struggles on different
occasions
Compromise and accommodation guarantees democracy
2. Elite theory C. Wright Mills: Argues that despite compromise and accommodation, power is
concentrated in higher-status groups, whose interests the political system serves best
• Elite theory claims that the wealthy have a disproportionate influence over the state since
• The most powerful elites are the people who run the country’s several hundred biggest
• The elite are interconnected and move from one elite group to another over the course
they have disproportionate resources to run for office, contribute to parties, and influence
politicians
corporations, the executive branch of government, and the military
of their careers; however, they do not form a ruling class (i.e., self conscious and cohesive
group of people led by corporate executives who act to advance their common interests)
because each elite group has its own jealously guarded sphere of influence thereby making
conflict between elite groups frequent
Elites are interconnected but do not form a ruling class*
Critique of pluralist
• Existence of large, persistent, wealth-based inequalities in political influence and political
• Political involvement decreases with social class
• As political involvement declines, so does political influence
• Lower classes are less likely to vote, run for office, and influence public policy
participation
Marxist theory: rare occasion when political power is rapidly redistributed by revolutionary upheavals.
i. Instrumentalist Marxists: Argue that elites form a ruling class, one dominated by big business
The state is instrument of business elite who gain control of state by:
Having members of wealthy families occupy important state positions, and
Having the state rely on big business for advice and financial support
Agree to maintain health of capitalist system
Structuralist Marxists: Argue capitalist state acts as arm of big business because it is embedded
in a capitalist system that forces it to act this way*, well being of big businesses
According to Structuralist Marxists, the capitalist state acts as an arm of big business not
because of social origins of elite members and social ties among elites but because it is
constrained to do so by the nature of capitalism itself
According to both of these Marxist theories, ordinary citizens – and especially members of the
working class – rarely have much influence over state policy; true democracy can emerge, then,
only if members of the working class and their supporters overthrow capitalism and establish
a socialist system in which economic differences between people are eliminated or at least
substantially reduced
As intensity of political participation declines, so does political influence.
Poor think government doesn’t care what they think, and less likely to vote then well to do people.
Power balance theory:
• Argues that despite concentration of power in society, substantial shifts in distribution of power
often occur
• Democratic politics becomes a contest among various classes and other groups to control the
state for their own advantage
• Power concentrated in hands of wealthy, but sometimes other classes gain power.
These shifts have discernible effects on voting patterns and public policies
• Suggests degree to which a country is democratic depends on distribution of power between
upper and lower classes
A country is more democratic when power is widely distributed*
Although power-balance theorists admit that power is usually in the hands of the wealthy, they
insist that power is sometimes redistributed with profound effects
When power is substantially redistributed – when, for example, a major class gets better
organized while another major class becomes less socially organized – old ruling parties usually
fall and new ones take office (although this does not become a winner-take-all phenomenon
because the party in power must attend somewhat to the wants of the losing minorities)
By treating the distribution of power as a variable, power-balance theorists improve our
understanding of the relationship between power and democracy
State Centered Theory:
• Argues that despite influence of distribution of power on political life, state structures also exert
important and independent effect on politics
• Focuses on how the state itself structures political life independently of way power is distributed
among classes and other groups
Example: United State’s citizen-initiated voter registration law that effectively disenfranchises
many disadvantaged people*
From this point of view, the high rate of non-voting in the United States, for example, is a
result of voter registration law that requires individual citizens to take initiative in registering
themselves in voter registration centres
Since many American citizens are unable or unwilling to register, the United States has a
proportionately smaller pool of eligible voters than other democracies: Only about 65% of
American citizens are registered to vote
As well, because some types of people are less able and inclined than others to register, a strong
bias is introduced into the political system: specifically, the poor are less likely to register than
the better-off
People without much formal education are less likely to register than the better educated, and
members of disadvantaged racial minority groups – especially African Americans – are less likely
to register than whites
Thus, American voter registration law is a pathway to democracy for some but a barrier to
democracy for others and strong bias introduced into political system.
POWER FROM BELOW: POLITICS BEYOND THE RULES
Relative deprivation theory
• Argues social rebellion occurs when an intolerable gap develops between social rewards people
feel they deserve and social rewards they expect to receive
• According to this theory, then, people are most likely to rebel against authority when rising
expectations are met by sudden decline in social rewards.
Social rewards include money, education, security, prestige, etc.
• Claims those who lead and join social movements are likely to be “outsiders” who lack strong
social ties to community
• Large body of research has discredited both claims*
Resource Mobilization Theory:
Based on the idea that social movements emerge only when disadvantaged people can marshal the
means necessary to challenge authority.
• Success or failure of social movements depends largely on availability of resources
Resources include jobs, money, arms, capacity to create strong social ties among themselves,
and access to means of spreading their ideas
Example: High level of unionization is conducive to more strike activity because unions provide
workers with leadership, strike funds, and coordination*
Strike activity has been high when- unemployment is low, union membership is high, and govt’s have
shown themselves to be generous in their provision of social welfare benefits.
Strong social ties among workers and access to jobs and money increases challenge to authority.
Striking was upward until 1974, then prices of oil increased welfare cut, welfare programs cut because
government was burdened by debt
Framing Discontent
• The theory focuses on the process by which individual interests, beliefs, and values either
become congruent and complementary with the activities, goals and ideology of the movement,
or fail to do so
• Stresses face-to-face interaction strategies employed by movement members to recruit non- members who are like-minded, non interested, or even initially opposed to the movements’
goals
• Frame alignment strategies include:
Reaching out to other organizations thought to contain members sympathetic to movement’s
cause
Elevating importance of positive beliefs about the movement
Stressing likelihood of the movement’s success*
Other ways in which frame alignment can be encouraged are:
Analyzing in a clear and convincing manner the causes of the problem that the movement is
trying to solve
Stretching their objectives and activities to win recruits who are not initially sympathetic to the
movement’s original aims (may involve “watering down” of the movements ideals)
Reaching out to recruit non members who are like minded, apathetic or even initially opposed
to movements goals.
HISTORY AND FUTURE OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS: THE RICH COUNTRIES
• Three centuries ago, social movements typically were small, localized, and violent
• Subsequent growth of the state led to changes in social movements, including:
Growing in size (partly due to increased literacy, modes of communication, and new densely
populated social settings)
Becoming less violent (size and organization often allowed movements to become sufficiently
powerful to get their way without frequent resort to extreme measures)*
Three centuries ago, in Europe, poor residents of a particular city might riot against public
officials in reaction to a rise in bread prices or taxed
• Peasants on a particular estate might burn their landowner’s barns (or their landowner) in
response to his demand for a larger share of their crop
• Were four stages in efforts to expand rights of citizens:
1. Civil citizenship: 18th
justice before the law
2. Political citizenship: 19th
3. Social citizenship: 20th
full participation in social life
Universal citizenship: Last third of 20th-century struggle to recognize right of marginal groups
and rights of humanity as a whole to full citizenship
New social movements
Goals:
century-struggle for the right to free speech, freedom of religion, and
/early 20th-century struggle for right to vote and run for office
century-struggle for right to a minimum level of economic security and
Membership: New social movements are novel in that they attract disproportionately large number of
well-to-do people from social, educational, and cultural fields
Members include teachers, professors, journalists, social workers, artists, actors, writers, and
student apprentices to these positions
Globalization potential:
• In the 1960s, social movements were typically national in scope
• Greenpeace is an example of a highly successful environmental movement that originated in
Vancouver in the mid-1970s and now has offices n 41 countries, with its international office in
Amsterdam; among other initiatives, it has mounted a campaign to eliminate the international
transportation and dumping of toxic wastes
• New social movements possess more potential for globalization than old social movements
• Globalization facilitated by inexpensive jet transportation and innovations in communications
technology
• Often transcend local and national boundaries to promote universalistic goals (e.g., anti-nuclear
and environmental movements)*
Social movements in Developing countries
• “Other 85%” of the world is weak economically, politically, and militarily because of colonial rule
and delay in industrializing economy
• Rather than seek to broaden democracy through expansion of citizenship rights, social
movements (fueled by anti-Western sentiment) focus on ensuring more elemental human
rights, such as:
Freedom from colonial rule
Freedom to create conditions for independent economic growth**
Outside of the world’s 20 or so richest countries, Western domination prevented
industrialization and the growth of a large business class; this constrained the growth of
democracy and bred resentment against Western power
Social movements in developing countries tend to focus more on restoring independence and
dignity lost through colonial rule rather than on minority rights, multiculturalism, elections, etc.
One of the great tasks that the West faces in the 21st
while doing its utmost to remove the ultimate source of that violence: The gap between rich and
poor countries that opened up at the time of the Industrial Revolution and that has widened
ever since.
century is to defend itself against violence
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The state is a centralized and bureaucratized political unit whose control extends across a given territory…
- 2402 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
group of people from getting too much power? A tyranny is a power held by…
- 448 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Text’s concern: power as it is used to affect who will hold government office and how government will behave…
- 629 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
states from abuse from the Federal Government but also to protect the citizens from abuse by the state.…
- 2318 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
the government under majority rule. In order for a government to exist the people must…
- 725 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
What term describes the arrangement where powers of the state and national governments are distinct and autonomous in their own domains?…
- 3746 Words
- 15 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Authority is an important resource for the state and any other organisation seeking to govern peoples conduct as it enables organisations and social actors that form parts of the state to direct aspects of social life. It also enables organisations to intervene to direct particular people or improve particular conditions. The relationship between the state and its territory is not pre-given but rather is a product of constant claims and the authority of the state has to be created and sustained.…
- 657 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Authority- refers to the willingness of people to obey government out of respect, while power may be created simply out of fear.…
- 1556 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
‘The state (as defined by Max Weber) is an organisation that successfully claims a monopoly of the legitimate use of force in a given territory.’- the state‘s authority may be backed by violence if necessary. ‘Territory is clearly central to Webers definition - the state claims to be dominant within a defined territory or within a country’s borders.’…
- 1629 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
This is claim to legitimacy is done through a process which is nationally defined and often involves the notion of the law, such as the electoral college and any…
- 2197 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
the main governing body, in the UK’s case its Westminster. The UK is also democratic…
- 759 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In a representative government (a form of government where the powers of the sovereignty are delegated to a body of men, elected from time to time, who exercise them for…
- 599 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
* A political party is a group of persons who seek to control government by winning elections and holding office.…
- 3978 Words
- 16 Pages
Good Essays -
operating, and then the government has lost meaning in the democratic ruling of its people.…
- 1246 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
of certain legal institutions. These are mainly, a constitution which outlines the structure of government and defines its power, a tripartite structure…
- 584 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays