Friedman criticizes business managers who engage in socially responsible behavior by using the argument that there is a different set of criteria for social responsible behavior of a person, who happens to be a corporate executive (businessman) versus that same person acting as an individual in a free-society. A business manager’s main responsibility is to maximize the profit of the corporation. When that person combines those roles and directs a corporation to take on a social responsible cause, because it would either increase cost or decrease revenue, it would be equivalent to a tax on the customers, shareholders and employees without their consent and in some cases, knowledge.…
Promoting a social justice may be justified, because it has been proven to create the competitive advantage by creating loyal employees, which directly leads to attaining loyal costumers. This may create an argument on flip side, that it may increase the administrative expenses which may also distracts the executive, as well as managers from their soul responsibility looking to increase the profits. This idea of profit maximization is well supported by the greatly Friedman, who particularly rejected the idea off business leaders articulating new visions that consider any business aspect than the profit maximizations them selves. The survey of corporate social responsibility research says, “ It creates administrative expenses, distracts executives, confuses economic goal, and subtracts from social welfare when the corporation is less efficient.” (The good company, 22)…
Renowned author Milton Friedman stated that: “The business of business is business”. He believes that society’s interests are in direct contrast to corporate management’s ideologies. In an attempt to promote their own causes and still enlist the support of society, organizations have implemented Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). This concept proves to be a disillusioned attempt by companies that claim to already be practicing CSR, to satisfy campaign groups that insist that they need to do more to mitigate their social issues. As other countries in the world, especially Continental and Central Europe are moving toward the Anglo-Saxon shareholder value model; many debates arise and prove to have global…
Friedman, M. F. (n.d.). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In A. Allhoff & A. Vaidya (Eds.), Business in Ethical Focus: An Anthology(pp. 65-69). Peterborough: Broadview.…
Milton Friedman argued that a business’s only goal is to generate shareholder profit. This is stated in the very title of a New York Times article written by Milton Friedman, “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits”. This statement would no doubt start a myriad of discussions with in the business world. Why would Friedman take this type of right wing stand? Shouldn’t a company consider social issues in their everyday business as well?…
It is overwhelming how corporations have embedded a social responsibility in their mission statements and company objectives. This leaves us with one assertion that is that corporations do have some level of obligation towards society’s morality; however, the corporation itself is not a moral agent (Klaus M. Leisinger). The discussion that follows is about corporations being moral agents or otherwise; however I will reach a conclusion that corporations do have an obligation that extends beyond obeying the law; evens so this obligation have been derived from the corporations quest for profit making. Corporation’s obligation…
What is the responsibility of a business or corporation? Is it to meet stakeholder expectations and follow legal guidelines, or is there a higher responsibility? While Milton Friedman asserted in his famous essay that “the social responsibility of a business is to increase profits,” it can be argued that companies also have higher moral responsibilities. The question in each ethical dilemma is, “To whom do we have a moral responsibility?”…
Thirty-five years ago, Milton Friedman wrote a famous article for The New York Times Magazine whose title aptly summed up its main point: "The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits." Friedman had no patience for capitalists who claimed that "business is not concerned 'merely' with profit but also with promoting desirable 'social' ends; that business has a 'social conscience' and takes seriously its responsibilities for providing employment, eliminating discrimination, avoiding pollution and whatever else may be the catchwords of the contemporary crop of reformers." Friedman wrote that such people are "preaching pure and unadulterated socialism. Businessmen who talk this way are unwitting puppets of the intellectual forces that have been undermining the basis of a free society these past decades."…
Respond to the position made by Milton Freedman on corporate social responsibility at this site (if this does not connect directly please copy and past on a separate web page on the URL line):…
Friedman argues that the objective of a corporation is to maximize the profits within the guidelines of the law in the free and open society. If the corporate executive has a “social responsibility”, which means his is to act that is not in the interest of his employers.…
There is more than one definition for corporate social responsibility. One way in which it can be defined is the obligation of organization management to make decisions and take actions that will enhance the welfare and interests of society as well as the organization (Daft, 2003). In other words, corporate actions have social implications, and managers have a responsibility to act in ways which benefit society as well as the organization (Body, 2005). The difficulty that most companies of today are facing is that investing money in order to become more socially responsible may benefit one of the company’s…
Milton Friedman and others have argued that a corporation 's purpose is to maximize returns to its shareholders, and that since only people can have social responsibilities, corporations are only responsible to their shareholders and not to society as a whole. They assert that corporations have no other obligation to society. (Freeman,…
The crux of the issue that Friedman tries to dissect is whether businesses acting socially responsible are effectively imposing a tax on those who invest their resources in such firms. Friedman’s argument centers around two ‘political questions’: whether firms have the appropriate mechanisms for determining the socially optimal use of resources, and whether corporations could recognize the repercussions that would arise from their decisions to assume social responsibilities. Friedman simplifies the two ideas into the argument of principle, and the argument of consequence. In answering both, Friedman determines that it is in the best interests for firms to maximize profits.…
In recent years, Corporate and Social Responsibility has become an ever increasing concern and source of community debate. It is now socially accepted that corporations have some ongoing responsibility, though sometimes ignored, to set a good example, make decisions based on social good and on ensuring positive environmental practices.…
Friedman, M., Mackey, J., & Rodgers, T. (2005, October). Rethinking the social responsibility of business . Retrieved October 2008, from Reason online: http://www.reason.com/news/show/32239.html…