Preview

thompson v foy

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
27409 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
thompson v foy
Westlaw UK Delivery Summary
Request made by :

Athens IP User

Request made on:

Thursday, 17 April, 2014 at 19:33 BST

Client ID:

Athens

Content Type

Westlaw UK

Title :

Thompson v Foy

Delivery selection:

Current Document

Number of documents delivered:

1

Sweet & Maxwell is part of Thomson Reuters. © 2014 Thomson Reuters
(Professional) UK Limited

Page 1

Mrs Marion Mary Thompson v Mrs Julie Ann Foy
The Mortgage Business v Mrs Julie Ann Foy, Mrs Marion Thompson
Case Nos: 7BM305000, 7PC06111
High Court of Justice Chancery Division Birmingham District Registry
20 May 2009

[2009] EWHC 1076 (Ch)
2009 WL 1321884
Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice Lewison
Date: 20 May 2009
Hearing dates: 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 March and 22, 23 April 2009

Representation

Mr Soofi Din (instructed by Bryan & Armstrong ) for the First Claimant.

Mr Benjamin Wood (instructed by Drydens ) for the Second Claimant.

Mrs Julie Anne Foy the First Defendant appeared in person.

Approved Judgment
The Honourable Mr. Justice Lewison

Introduction

2

Early years

3

Mr Thompson's death

5

A move to Spain?

6

A re-think

11

Legal advice

13

New instructions

21

Page 2

Waiting for the mortgage

23

The mortgage comes through

24

The Spanish purchase

28

The issues

30

Mrs Foy's interest in Valley View

31

Undue influence

34
The law

34

Does a presumption arise?

36

Was there actual undue influence?

39

Overriding interest

42

Estoppel and consent

48

A charge over Mrs Foy's beneficial interest

49

The loan of £20,000

50

Introduction
1 On 22 January 2007 Mrs Julie Foy was registered as proprietor of Valley View, Hillside,
Stretton, Alfreton in Derbyshire. On 5 April 2007 she granted a mortgage over the property to The
Mortgage Business plc (“TMB”) which was in turn registered as proprietor of the charge on 10
April 2007. Mrs Foy's

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Angus Cartwright III was an investment advisor based in Arlington, Virginia which main role in this particular scenario was to act as the intermediary between the DeRight brothers and potential local real estate properties. There was history already established between the DeRight and Cartwright family as they had been involved in business in the past, and there was full confidence of Angus expertise on arriving to an adequate deal. Cartwright had fully prepared a detailed financial analysis of four properties and was intending to best fit each DeRight’s goals and future expectations.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miller v. Bud

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Target for Lite (1970): 21-34 year old males with blue-collar occupations, who were the heavy users of the beer category…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bethel V Fraser

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the parties involved in this case is Matthew Fraser, high school student, and his father. They are both the respondents, the defendants in the case. The other party was the Bethel School District. The school district is the plaintiff in this case.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    How did the Three Branches of government respond to the social issues of freedom of religion based on Wallace v. Jaffree case?…

    • 1976 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Buchanan V. Warley

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This case was the first to be brought to Supreme Court by the newly organized civil rights organization, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). Moorfield Storey argued the case for Buchanan. This case was of course odd. Buchanan, a white man, was suing Warley, a black, to force him to buy a house in a mainly…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Morse V. Frederick

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Personally as a Supreme Court judge and after taking a fairly through look at the cases, I’d have to rule in favor of Frederick. While the banner that Mr. Frederick had up during the school event does make a reference to drugs, the message is pretty vague as even I can’t really interpret the true absolute definition of the banner. Judge Steven even states “Justice John Paul Stevens took the position that the school 's interest in protecting students from speech that can be reasonably regarded as promoting drug use does not justify Frederick 's punishment for his attempt to make an ambiguous statement simply because it refers to drugs.” ( n/a, 2012). Another important reason why I am following this ruling is because while yes Mr. Frederick had a 14 foot banner held high it didn’t exactly disrupt the school event itself and it was the principals own interpretation of the message that caused a disruption that escalated into Frederick’s unjustified punishment. This statement from the ACLU even states that Fredericks actions were done off school campus, “As the ACLU and Mertz noted, the sign caused no disruption, was displayed at the Olympic Torch Relay - a public event on public streets - and Frederick had not yet arrived at school for the day.” (N/a, 2007 ). Just by this alone I believe that the principal had no justification in asking to take the banner down because of the cryptic message let alone punish Mr. Frederick just because of her own intrepertation.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Vs Sanford

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Supreme Court first heard the case of Dred Scott vs. Sanford in 1857. Dred Scott was a slave who lived in Missouri with his owner. His owner took him to Illinois and Minnesota, two states that prohibited slavery. After the owner died, Scott proclaimed himself a free man and his family free due to the fact that he had resided on “free soil” for several years and that his four children had also been born on “free soil”. He sued the man’s widow and won and lost his case in several courts over an 11 year period. At this point in history, the Missouri Compromise had been in effect for about 40 years, but was never officially ruled on by the Supreme Court. Many Southerners were hoping that the Compromise be ruled unconstitutional due to the…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Powell v AL

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS: Nine young black boys riding in an open train car were involved in a fight. When the fight ceased, two white women claimed the black boys raped them. Once the boys got off the train in Scottsboro, Alabama, police picked them up and placed them in jail. The men appeared in court, frightened, and unrepresented. The defendants were charged with a capital offence and therefore had the right for counsel to be appointed to them by the court. However, the court decided to call on the lawyers from the surrounding area. Of course no lawyer came to their defense. The day before the case, on April 6, a lawyer took their case. Because he was not able to prepare an adequate defense 8 of the 9 defendants were convicted and sentenced to death.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Karen L. Jerman had a mortgage with Countrywide Home Loans and was contacted by the law firm Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPA, on behalf of Country Wide, seeking a foreclosure on Jerman’s property.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott v. Sanford

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dred Scott, an African American man who was born into slavery, wanted what all slaves would have wanted, their freedom. They were mistreated, neglected, and treated not as humans, but as property. In 1852, Dred Scott sued his current owner, Sanford, about him, no longer being a slave, but a free man (Oyez 1). In Article four of the Constitution, it states that any slave, who set foot in a free land, makes them a free man. This controversy led to the ruling of the state courts and in the end, came to the final word of the Supreme Court. Is he a slave or a free man?…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    George Will V. Coleman

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page

    George Will, granted he did have plenty of evidence to support his proposition, did not present his findings clearly enough in my opinion, but rather lost me at some points. Fortunately, he was still able to grab my attention with the statistics and factual data that supported the Coleman report. This previous school year, I was in the AP Psychology course that Mckeel offers, and from what I learned in that class I believe that the family status of a child has more effect on how they do in school. Coleman's report has been seen as fact for the past five decades, so I don't imagine Will's article not being embraced by society now.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    SC was contacted via phone by provider, Mrs. Beard to informed SC of Jori new address. Jori new address is 709 Lemon Dr. Cedar Hill. Mrs. Bread noted she will have two housemate. Jori will still have her own room. Mrs. Beard noted the group is more activated and Jori will go out on more outing. Mrs. Beard noted that Jori seem to enjoy her new home…

    • 69 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Square Manchester M60

    • 7746 Words
    • 31 Pages

    CO-OPERATIVE GROUP LIMITED REGISTERED OFFICE: 1 Angel Square Manchester M60 0AG REGISTERED NUMBER: 525R (Registered under I&P Acts 1965-2003) Group Secretary: Moira Lees SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES/ORGANISATIONS * name changed from Co-operative Wholesale Society Limited on 14 January 2001 name changed from Co-operative Group (CWS) Ltd on 3 December 2007 December 2012 Name of Company Percentage Owned 2Can Travel Limited 100%…

    • 7746 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lang v Morrison

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Lang v James Morrison & Co Ltd (1912) 13 CLR 1, an action was brought by an English company, James Morrison & Co Ltd, against three defendants, J McFarland, T Lang and W Keates. The plaintiffs carried on the business of receiving and disposing of frozen meat from abroad. They alleged that the three defendants carried on business in Melbourne as partners under the names ‘T McFarland & Co’ and on occasions ‘McFarland, Lang and Keates’. Before the action commenced, J McFarland and W Keates became insolvent and the action proceeded against their assignees and Lang. At the trial, judgment was given for the plaintiff and Lang appealed to the High Court.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    That has its domicile in ROBISON SPRINFINLL #156 same as notes for all legal purposes that take place.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics