U.s. vs prince
LEXSEE 938 F2D 1092
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALFRED JAMES PRINCE, Defendant-Appellant
No. 90-6370
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
938 F.2d 1092; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 14248
July 9, 1991, Filed
SUBSEQUENT HISTORY: Writ of certiorari denied Prince v. United States, 502 U.S. 961, 112 S. Ct. 427, 116 L. Ed. 2d 447, 1991 U.S. LEXIS 6611 (1991)
Post-conviction proceeding at, Motion denied by United States v. Prince, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17403 (10th Cir. Okla., July 10, 2006)
PRIOR HISTORY: [**1] On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma; D.C. No. CR-90-96-W; D.C. Judge Lee R. West.
DISPOSITION: Affirmed.
COUNSEL: Submitted on the Briefs: *
* After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Timothy D. Leonard, United States Attorney, and Ted A. Richardson, Assistant United States Attorney, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Bill Zuhdi, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Defendant-Appellant.
JUDGES: Anderson, Barrett, and Brorby, Circuit Judges.
OPINION BY: BRORBY
OPINION [*1093] BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
While the public's perception of lawyers seems to reach new lows every day, parents -- we are told -- still encourage their children to enter this profession. 1 But the parent who happens to read this opinion may not be so quick to urge a loved child to become a lawyer after learning how the defendant in this case expressed his extreme personal dislike of his lawyer. Likewise, the would-be lawyer raised on the hit television series, L.A. Law, to [**2] believe a law degree is that golden ticket to a glamorous career of big money, fast cars and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALFRED JAMES PRINCE, Defendant-Appellant
No. 90-6370
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
938 F.2d 1092; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 14248
July 9, 1991, Filed
SUBSEQUENT HISTORY: Writ of certiorari denied Prince v. United States, 502 U.S. 961, 112 S. Ct. 427, 116 L. Ed. 2d 447, 1991 U.S. LEXIS 6611 (1991)
Post-conviction proceeding at, Motion denied by United States v. Prince, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17403 (10th Cir. Okla., July 10, 2006)
PRIOR HISTORY: [**1] On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma; D.C. No. CR-90-96-W; D.C. Judge Lee R. West.
DISPOSITION: Affirmed.
COUNSEL: Submitted on the Briefs: *
* After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Timothy D. Leonard, United States Attorney, and Ted A. Richardson, Assistant United States Attorney, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Bill Zuhdi, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Defendant-Appellant.
JUDGES: Anderson, Barrett, and Brorby, Circuit Judges.
OPINION BY: BRORBY
OPINION [*1093] BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
While the public's perception of lawyers seems to reach new lows every day, parents -- we are told -- still encourage their children to enter this profession. 1 But the parent who happens to read this opinion may not be so quick to urge a loved child to become a lawyer after learning how the defendant in this case expressed his extreme personal dislike of his lawyer. Likewise, the would-be lawyer raised on the hit television series, L.A. Law, to [**2] believe a law degree is that golden ticket to a glamorous career of big money, fast cars and