Preview

U.S V. Korematsu

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
461 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
U.S V. Korematsu
Name: |Date: | |Graded Assignment

Korematsu v. the United States (1944)

Use the background information and the primary sources in the Graded Assignment: Primary Sources sheet to answer the following questions.

(2 points)

|Score |
| |

1. What did Fred T. Korematsu do that resulted in his arrest and conviction?

Answer:

(2 points)

|Score |
| |

2. According to the first paragraph from the excerpts of the majority opinion, what did the U.S. government believe some Japanese Americans would do if they were allowed to remain free on the West Coast?

Answer:

(2 points)

|Score |
| |

3. The majority of the court believed that compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes was okay in what situation?

Answer:

(2 points)

|Score |
| |

4. What did the dissenting justices think about the power of military authorities?

Answer:

(2 points)

|Score |
| |

5. The dissenting opinion raises the fact that Japanese Americans were being deprived of what rights?

Answer:

(40 points)

|Score |
| |

6. Imagine you are living in Los Angeles in 1944 and have just read about the case of Korematsu v. the United States. Write a letter to the editor of the Los Angeles Times telling which opinion in the case (majority or dissenting) you support and explain why.

Refer to the rubric and scoring instructions on the next page to see how your teacher will grade your assignment.

Answer:

|Your Score |___ of 50 |
Rubric and Scoring Instructions

|Category |1 point |2 points |3 points |4 points |5 points |Score |
|Organiza-tion

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    23. In the preamble of the Declaration of Rights and Grievances, which of the following was NOT used as a basis for their rights?…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Second paragraph–Explain whether you tended to favor loose or strict interpretation of the laws and rights in this case. Give specific examples of where you used each type of interpretation in this case. Explain your reasons for favoring one or the other.) In…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Korematsu v. United States (1944) case was an unjustifiable case towards individuals with a particular race, but even though at the moment it seemed like the appropriate action to take for the protection of the people in our country, the action towards this race was completely inappropriate and unconstitutional. During the War of World War II, the president of the United States, Franklin Roosevelt put a float the Executive Order 9066 that targeted individuals from the Pacific Coast of Japanese ancestry both citizens and non-citizens. The order was to get any individual with in the area of the Pacific Coast to report to assembly centers where they were being detained until released by military authorities. Individuals with Japanese ancestry were being imprisoned without any evidence that they were a danger to the country and were deprived from their Constitutional rights. At first the first order was for any individual with Japanese ancestry to stay in their home with a curfew assigned to them, without…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Korematsu’s Side of the case involved several major arguments following the cases validity. The Violation of Korematsu’s Civil Rights, the violation of Korematsu’s and Others of Japanese ancestry rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, and Whether Public law 503 and the Executive Order 9066 where legal and…

    • 2136 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Court's Decision - The Supreme Court upheld the order excluding persons of Japanese ancestry from the West Coast war zone during World War II. Three justices dissented. Justice Hugo Black delivered the opinion of the Court. He began with the observation that legal restrictions on the rights of a single racial group will always be “suspect” and that “courts must subject them to the most rigid scrutiny.” However, they are not necessarily unconstitutional. The exclusion order imposed hardships “upon a large group of American citizens. …But hardships are part of war….Compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes, except under circumstances of direst emergency and peril, is inconsistent with our basic governmental institutions. But when under conditions of modern warfare our shores are threatened by hostile forces, the power to protect must be commensurate with the threatened danger.” Justice Owen Roberts wrote in his dissent that this “is the case of convicting a citizen as a punishment for not submitting to imprisonment in a concentration camp, based on his ancestry, and solely because of his ancestry, without evidence or inquiry concerning his loyalty and good disposition towards the United States.” Justice Robert Jackson noted that comparable burdens were not imposed upon descendents of the other nationalities (German, Italian) with who the United States was also at war.…

    • 508 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. What rights did the students believe had been violated? What is the relevant wording of the First Amendment?…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Worcester vs Georgia

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. All but one of justices agreed that the national (NOT state) could make laws affecting Cherokee Nation…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    WW2 study guide

    • 577 Words
    • 2 Pages

    12. Why did FDR decide to place Japanese Americans in internment camps? US citizens didn't trust them…

    • 577 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Justice Murphy stated that the orders were a violation of the Constitution, because they were discriminatory and deprived American citizens from their rights. In order for the laws to take away constitutional rights, is to have the danger of not having the laws imminent. In Justice Murphy’s opinion, the danger was no imminent so the orders were unconstitutional. Also, Justice Murphy said the orders were in violation of the Fifth Amendment. Justice Murphy stated that the Japanese-Americans did not receive due process, another violation of rights.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The documents consistently showed that Japanese Americans had committed no acts of treason to justify mass incarceration. With this new evidence, a pro-bono legal team that included the Asian Law Caucus re-opened Korematsu’s 40-year-old case on the basis of government…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The historical circumstances surrounding the case of Korematsu v. U.S. are as follows. In the 1940’s there was a strong anti-Japanese feeling throughout all of America. There was an act passed requiring all people of Japanese heritage to relocate from restricted areas. This is because of World War II and intense hatred towards the Japanese after the attack at Pearl Harbor. Korematsu was arrested and he brought it to the Supreme Court questioning the constitutionality of order #9066 and #34 which are the reasons he was arrested. The Supreme Court’s decision on the case was that because of the circumstances of world war the president and congress had the right to violate his constitutional rights. The court…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Farewell to Manzanar

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On December 7, 1941 there was a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii by Japan. The attack came from the Japanese, yet it caused unfounded fear in this country toward Japanese Americans. The book Farewell to Manzanar by Jeanne Wakatsuki Houston and James D. Houston depicts the reactions of the government and the American public toward Japanese Americans after the attack on Pearl Harbor. So why were they the ones punished for it? We still see examples of inaccurate assumptions, hypocrisy, and discrimination during this time in our nation’s history that can be related to our own community since we continue to categorize, generalize and overreact.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap Nsl

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. What are the three reasons why the liberties claimed by some people become major issues?…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Q: What arguments did the southern legislator make against the Supreme Court decision? Did they question its power to make the decision or the content of the decision itself?…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was a heated topic in Congress. Defend the passage or rejection of the Act with reference to the moral, political, constitutional and practical concerns of a congressman.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics