What is Knowledge(Draft) Essay Example
Word Count: 1,300
What is Knowledge?
3. “Knowledge is nothing more than the systematic organization of facts.” Discuss this statement in relation to two areas of knowledge. There is a natural temptation to assume that knowledge requires distinct capacities due to the fact that we, as humans, are thinkers and doers. When concluding on an issue, we often are guided by our knowledge of truths about the world. By contrast, when we act, we are guided by our knowledge of how to perform various actions. To say that knowledge is nothing but the systematic organization of facts would mean that whether the knowledge type is theoretical or practical, it will all be obtained the same way. Theoretical derives from the word theory, which is found be a system of ideas, not facts. This brings up my first knowledge issue of what exactly verifies that a fact is a fact. We as humans use information from what we hear along with what we believe to justify whether or not an issue is a fact or not. We make claims but have no real evidence, just belief. Knowledge itself is obtained by a person through experience or education. Knowledge can be viewed in many ways based on the 4 different ways of knowing: Language, Perception, Reason, and Emotion. How is one able to tell whether they actually know something or not? My last knowledge issue is that since knowledge is “nothing more” than a systematic organization, does that make knowledge of the past always certain?
Science is based on facts, not opinions or preferences. According to The Nature of Science, it is “a determination of what is most likely to be correct at the current time with the evidence at our disposal.” It aims for measurable results through testing and analysis. It views knowledge as a systematic enterprise that has the ability to build and organize knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. It also refers to a body of knowledge that is able to be rationally explained and reliably
What is Knowledge?
3. “Knowledge is nothing more than the systematic organization of facts.” Discuss this statement in relation to two areas of knowledge. There is a natural temptation to assume that knowledge requires distinct capacities due to the fact that we, as humans, are thinkers and doers. When concluding on an issue, we often are guided by our knowledge of truths about the world. By contrast, when we act, we are guided by our knowledge of how to perform various actions. To say that knowledge is nothing but the systematic organization of facts would mean that whether the knowledge type is theoretical or practical, it will all be obtained the same way. Theoretical derives from the word theory, which is found be a system of ideas, not facts. This brings up my first knowledge issue of what exactly verifies that a fact is a fact. We as humans use information from what we hear along with what we believe to justify whether or not an issue is a fact or not. We make claims but have no real evidence, just belief. Knowledge itself is obtained by a person through experience or education. Knowledge can be viewed in many ways based on the 4 different ways of knowing: Language, Perception, Reason, and Emotion. How is one able to tell whether they actually know something or not? My last knowledge issue is that since knowledge is “nothing more” than a systematic organization, does that make knowledge of the past always certain?
Science is based on facts, not opinions or preferences. According to The Nature of Science, it is “a determination of what is most likely to be correct at the current time with the evidence at our disposal.” It aims for measurable results through testing and analysis. It views knowledge as a systematic enterprise that has the ability to build and organize knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. It also refers to a body of knowledge that is able to be rationally explained and reliably