Preview

What Is Law and Justice? Essay Example

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
536 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Law and Justice? Essay Example
The history of law and justice is the history of civilization, and law itself is only the blessed tie that binds human society together. Our ancestors had no idea of redress beyond vengeance, or of justice beyond only individual reprisal. The law, like everything we do and like everything we say, is a heritage from the past. We just follow in their footsteps and carry on with it, and keep it in today's society, only to prevent chaos and keep a social society running smoothly.
Greeks, Romans, Egyptians and Hebrews all shared something common in their ideas of laws. It was that they basically created laws to keep a society organized and if certain people broke the laws then harsh justice is done to them. The Romans and the Greeks had similarities in their laws; they made their own laws, there was a code of laws and court and legal systems. Hebrews based their law on 10 commandments, while the Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, and Babylonians based theirs of what they chose. They put fear in their society to scare them and make sure they didn't break the law. Hammurabi's code was very rough to the society, especially if you were a seignior. The bad thing about this code is that if you stole anything or did something worse, they shall put you to death. The only good thing about the code was, that if you caught a slave and brought him back to his master, then the master paid you 2 shekels of silver. Hammurabi's code had common laws and justice with certain ancient civilizations, while the same thing goes with significant differences. Today's law and justice toward society is much different to ancient civilizations when it come to the death penalty, but other than that, it's pretty much the same. I agree and I'm thankful for the progressed in mankind's concepts of law and justice cuz it gives us a second chance to learn not to make the same mistakes. Everyone knows right from wrong, but if we get a second chance it makes most of us, stop and think about our actions before we

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi’s code was unjust because of it’s family laws. For example, law 168(doc c) gives the judge control over a man’s property. The man should be allowed to remove his son from his will because it’s his property. Maybe the son is lazy and never does anything. The judge should not decide what happens to property that isn’t his. Also, in law 195(doc c) the son is getting his hands cut off for striking his father.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hammurabi’s code was unjust because of property laws. In law 21 (excerpts from hammurabi’s code circa 1754 BCE. Doc E) it says “ If a man has broken the wall (to rob) a house, they shall put him to death and pierce him, or hang him the hole in the wall which he has made. Would you want a dead body in your house? Do you want your kids to see a man killed in your house? All of this seems like they will not clean up the body and they will just leave it there. When kids see a dead body they normally scream. When they actually see the person die they will have major trauma and that could affect their life forever.…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi Dbq Analysis

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hammurabi's code is not just because of its family law. In law 195, it says “ if a son has struck his father, his hands shall be cut off(doc C). This is unfair because the son is not being given another chance or he could be defending himself from an abusive father. In law 49 it says “ If a married lady is caught with another man, they shall bind them and cast them into the water(Doc C).” If a woman is seen making a trade with a man and this is mistaken as them having an affair, they get punished for something that is not true. The third way that Hammurabi's code is unfair is because it says “ If a ruler does not esteem my words, if he destroys the law which I have given, may the great gods of heaven and earth inflict a curse upon his family,…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hammurabi Dbq

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To begin with, Hammurabi’s code was just because it helped the family be together. For instance, in Law 129 it says if a married lady is caught in adultery, they shall both be bind and cast into water. Also, in Law 195 it says that if a son has struck his father, his hands shall be cut off. Based on what I read, Law 129 helped the lady and the man be together. On Law 125 it shows that it helped children be obedient. As you can see, these Laws helped the family be together by being obedient.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think that Hammurabi´s code is too harsh. The reason I think this is because why should a builder die because they built a weak house and the person inside died,why should someone lose their hands for stealing, should a slave's ear get…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hammurabi’s laws were based on the harsh “eye for eye, tooth for tooth” mentality of the ancient era, requiring a death penalty for many slight offenses. For example, according to the twenty-first law in Hammurabi’s code, “if any one breaks a hole into a house (break in to steal), he shall be put to death before that hole and be buried” (citation). In accordance to this law, anyone who tried—it did not matter if he actually did—to steal and was caught would be sentenced to death instantly. In fact, the Code further stated that even people who were discovered merely buying items from a robber would also be sentenced to death. This was not fair because if the robber is found but…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi's code was just because of the way it charged people concerning family law. If an man wife get sick he will have to take care of her but can marry an different women too. If an son hit his dad his hand will be cut off. ( Doc. c) It helps keep families together…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Was Hammurabi Unjust

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hammurabi had 282 laws many with extremely harsh punishments like death. Hammurabi was the ruler of Babylon for 42 years and was thought to have gotten his laws from the god of justice Shamash. I believe that Hammurabi’s code was unjust because of the family law, property law, and the personal injury law. First of all, it is unjust because of the family laws. Law 148 states that if a man's wife wife is severely ill the man can remarry but he cannot divorce the ill wife and still has to take care of her.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hammurabi's Code of Law and the Hebrew Law have many differences and many similarities. They both have laws on marriage, farming, religion, equality, and many other things. Both of these codes of law showed that each civilization had order and some form of government. It also showed how two civilizations, that are so far apart, can still think so alike and that humanity learns from it's mistakes by improving on them. Hammurabi had a nice view on how to keep things equal. He has the basic concept of “eye for an eye.” The Hebrew law also has this same concept because in one of it's laws, it says, “if a man smite the eye of his servant, or the eye of his maid, that it perish; he shall let him go free for his eye's sake..” (Exodus 21:28, KJV) This shows that both the Hebrews and Hammurabi's people, the Babylonians, had a sense of equality in social class and other things. There is a Hebrew law that if an ox gores a man or woman and kills him, and the owner knows about this and does nothing, then the ox and the owner will be put to death. This differs slightly from Hammurabi's Code because it does not say that the owner has to be put to death. It says that the owner shall pay ½ a mina of silver. This shows how the two different codes of laws and two different civilizations can still have similar concepts but have different ways to interpret them. But, most of these laws only applied to the situation or geography of the land at the time. There is many differences and similarities in both of these codes of law and almost impossible to conclude whether these are more similar or more different. It really all depends on opinion. These are examples on how Hammurabi's Code of Law and the Hebrew Law are alike or…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi Dbq Analysis

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although, some people may believe that hammurabi’s code was just they are wrong. Examples of injustices have been found in laws concerning family life, personal life, and personal property. Just imagine that you are a boy who has just struck your father and now you're getting your hands cut off, or that you are a slave girl that is getting unfair treatment, would you still think that Hammurabi’s code is…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hammurabi Research Paper

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The code had helped with keeping the town in control and supporting the weak with food and help. Hammurabi was very big on helping others. Hammurabi wanted the best for all of the people living in babylonia. Many of the punishments were very harsh and terrible, but they did not have any sort of jailing system so there was no other option. If the punishment was not harsh enough the criminals would never learn their lesson. Over all Hammurabi’s Code was a fair set of rules that was always accessible and could never be changed, he was a powerful ruler and had many good plans for…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bob the Builder

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many great societies are regulated and shaped by the laws they are governed by. A well-defined set of laws can help keep a society running like a well-oiled machine and keep a civilization going for hundreds of years. Two early civilizations that used well-structured laws were the Babylonians and the Canaanites. The Babylonians with the Hammurabi Code and the Canaanites with the Covenant Code were very similar codes that helped to keep both great societies in check. There should obviously be similarities between the two codes as they are both dealing with people who are related culturally, racially, and living in somewhat similar conditions. There also are similarities when dealing with incidents and when infringements occur what penalties will incur. There are quite a few striking differences though, mainly dealing with the religious side of the codes. While both codes allowed their respective civilizations to become great, there were a vast amount of differences between the two forms of law.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although our society today may want to be under a stricter rule of conduct, the laws we are under today are shaped to fit us in the best way. A Babylonian document, Hammurabi’s Code of Laws, consists of a set of laws enforced to discipline people. The laws are most based on social classes in which people were in. For example in The Code, one of the law states, “If he be a freeman, he (the physician) shall receive five shekels.” Basically meaning if he be a slave, or lower class man, he will not be paid if done a physician’s job. But he was a known physician and isn’t a freeman, he’d be paid five shekels. So are we better off with our present set of laws? Or is it in the best interest for our society to follow Hammurabi’s Code?…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Hammurabi Wrong

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hammurabi’s Code was harsh and quick in order to serve as a deterrent. The code’s harshness made people see what would happen to them if they broke the law. His code stopped people from breaking the law, so it protected the weak from the strong. The U.S does not have a harsh and quick system. In fact, it is very slow and does not have many major punishments. Many laws are broken in the U.S because our laws do not serve as a deterrent. If Hammurabi visited the U.S today I think he would not be pleased and he would not feel that his ideal was not being met. Hammurabi wanted to protect the weak from the strong, but the system of laws the United States has does not execute this. People rob, hurt, and even kill people on a day to day basis! Hammurabi…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi

    • 691 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe that there are some that need a harsh punishment to learn their lesson. Others need to be shown justice and mercy. Hammurabi’s Code provided a little bit of both almost 4,000 years ago. It was 1792 B.C.E, when Hammurabi rose to power as the ruler of Babylon. After ruling for 30 years, he created a set of laws. These laws were called the “Hammurabi’s Code”. He created this code with 282 laws because he was concerned about keeping order in his kingdom. They were carved on a stele made black diorite and placed three of them around his kingdom. Hammurabi's code has been called the first set of laws. But were these laws just and fair or were they too harsh? Looking at the three sets of laws; family law, injury law and property law we see that Hammurabi's code was a just and fair set of laws for the most part although there were many extreme laws that were very violent and could be considered harsh, severe and unjust. In the United States our Constitution forbids such cruel and unusual punishment. Hammurabi will be remembered as a smart and organized ruler who was the first one to establish a set of laws for a civilization.…

    • 691 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays