Preview

‘Incompetent Leadership Was the Most Important Reason for the Outbreak of Revolution in 1905’. How Far Do You Agree?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
880 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
‘Incompetent Leadership Was the Most Important Reason for the Outbreak of Revolution in 1905’. How Far Do You Agree?
‘Incompetent leadership was the most important reason for the outbreak of revolution in 1905’. How far do you agree?
The revolution of 1905 occurred due to many different reasons. Arguably the most important of these reasons was the incompetent leadership of the Tsar, Nicholas II, but there were other factors, such as the poverty among the peasants, the frustration at lack of political power in the autocracy, and also the impact of the Russo-Japanese war.
As mentioned, the most important reason for the outbreak of revolution in 1905 was the poor and incompetent rule of Tsar Nicholas II. The Tsar was viewed as a very weak man, only 5’7” tall and shy in character, lacking the physical intimidation of his father and grandfather. The most prominent example of his indecisive leadership can be seen in the handling of the events at his coronation, which later became known as the Khodynka Field Massacre, on 30th May 1896. The celebration was meant to show off the new Tsar and his generosity, with attendees being given free food to mark the occasion. However, as so many people showed up, word spread that there was not enough food to go around, and a stampede ensued, with people clambering over each other to reach the event first. Unfortunately the field where the coronation was being held was full of ditches and ravines, and in the chaos, many people were crushed to death, resulting in 1389 deaths. This tragedy started what was to be an uncomfortable rule for Nicholas, as many people questioned his competence to lead such a vast country as Russia. His incompetence meant that Russia as a country was seen as weak, and many of its inhabitants sought change and modernisation after 300 years of Romanov autocratic rule, leading to the 1905 revolution.
However there were other reasons why revolution broke out in 1905. One of these reasons, for example, was the discontent among the peasantry which mainly resulted from the food shortages that were rife in rural Russia. There were

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chapter 27 Review

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    7: In 1905 a revolt was caused by the loss of the Russo-Japanese war. The Tsar tried to calm the people by reforming but eventually took away rights and the reforms fell apart.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The February Revolution of 1917 brought the 300-year-old Romanov dynasty to an end. I believe that the immediate cause of the February Revolution of 1917 was the collapse of the Tsarist regime under the gigantic strain of World War I. The underlying cause was the backward economic condition of the country, which made it unable to sustain the war effort against powerful, industrialized Germany. All the other contributing factors only had a slight impact, I believe that they were not as important as the Great War.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were a number of reformist groups from 1881. Key examples of these were groups such as the Kadets, the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks. All three of these groups had slightly different aims. But all of them wanted something in common and that was change in Russia. Therefore as we clearly see reformist parties did put a large amount of pressure on Russia and on the Tsarist government. But on the other hand there were a number of other important factors that I believe where largely involved in causing the 1905 revolution. The factors I intend to include are: The large amount of social and economic problems, the Russo- Japanese war and bloody Sunday as I believe these were also key causes of the 1905 revolutions.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each of the factors mentioned above were reason for the revolt that took place at the end of February in 1917, however, many of the factors were similar to the conditions and causes of the revolt in 1905 which raises the question: why was the revolution of 1917 successful? One reason is that WWI worked as a catalyst, which facilitated the success of the revolution by assisting each factor in aligning at the same time and place. WWI was not the only catalyst as the idea of liberal and free conscience was the second key which shaped the success of this particular revolt. The police, distraught and overcome with grief and guilt for their actions the day before when they were ordered to fire on innocent, peaceful masses, turned their weapons over and joined forces with the rebel forces. This forced Nicholas to call to the front to send back patriot soldiers in order to help stabilize the home front, who had not idea what was happening at home but it was too…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The Weimar Republic was most in danger in 1923” How far do you agree with this statement?…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The revolution of 1917 was the culmination of a number of factors coming together and causing the volatile mix of reasons to come together and boil over. The people of Russia where fed up with the horrible conditions they had to put up with and decided to do something about it. Some factor I will discuss include the industrialization,…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    LALALA

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Tsarism in Russia survived the revolution of 1905 but not that of March 1917 due to the difference in support it had in both years. It faced many difficulties throughout much of its late history; from the assassination of Alexander II and the similar attempts on Alexander III, to the downfall of the Romanov dynasty and the final abdication of Tsar Nicholas II on the 2nd of March. The way the country was being run and the strongly Slavophile views within Russian society made it difficult for any kind of revolt to occur at any time. There were, however, two main revolts against the Tsarist government; these were the 1905 revolution and the March revolution of 1917. The first of these predominantly failed to make any major changes to the government for lack of organisation and coordination of the Tsarist regime’s opponents and the persistently loyal attitude of the armed forces towards The Tsar. The March 1917 revolution, however, resulted in major political revolution and a brand new government due to the impact of the First World War and social and economic discontent within Russian society. The attitudes of the regime’s Liberal opposition greatly varied from 1905 in 1917, and this also played a significant part in pressuring the Tsar Nicholas II to abdicate.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Revolution of 1905, Russians gained new political freedom. However, Russia was still plagued with problems. The famine from previous years still raged on. In 1914, Russia joined World War I. To pay for the war, Russia raised taxes, secured foreign loans, and printed more money. This combined with many other factors, left the people of Russia wanting change. They needed the government to change, the famine to end, and economic stability.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under many aspects it is arguable that the 1905 Revolution and the March 1917 Revolution in Russia were very similar. Both years found the country still struggling from a war (one bringing humiliation and the other incomprehension and outrage); both found hostility from the streets directed against perceived governmental incompetence. Yet something had changed from 1905 to 1917 for Tsarism not to be able to survive the second revolution like it did the first. The reasons are to be researched in the impact that World War 1 had on the country, the October Manifesto issued by Nicholas II on 1905, and the loyalty that the population and the Armed Forces were not willing to give the Tsar anymore.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based on events in history, the main cause of the Russian Revolution was the state that the government was in and the conditions the working class was in. The Czar gave up his throne and the government began to be corrupt along with the build up of repression from the working class, who suffered for many years before, about to burst. These events set the basis for the revolution and grew with the circumstance of instability throughout the government and Dumas. Even before and after the abdication of the czar Dumas have formed and dissolved adding to the instability of the government as a whole. We see this here, “These disorders… Forced the government to promise the establishment of a consultive Duma, or assembly, elected by limited franchise.” (“Russian Revolution”) Along with this workers rioted for their working conditions and rations, soon enough the military refuse to break up the protesters and rioters involved. It now turned chaotic and violent. A peaceful protest gone bad was the influence for most of the violence because it was a weak spot to the government. The revolution caused an outcome of twelve years in suffering from a transaction of a different political standing. Negotiations came forth and at ended with Germany cutting in.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Nationwide Revolution

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The first reason for the revolution in 1905 was the developments in the Russian countryside and how they produced a general unhappiness among the landowners and even the peasants. A long-term social and economic cause was the continuing dissatisfaction of both these groups to the Emancipation reform of Alexander II in 1861. The Landowners did not approve of the act because it denied them the free labour they had access to before the emancipation of the serfs. They had lost their free labour and large amounts of their land. By 1905 many of the Landowners were facing large debts. Although the act did end serfdom in Russia, the peasants were still angry due to the redemption payments they were expected to pay and the poor quality of land they received. They also disliked the fact that they were still tied to the…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia’s mistaken involvement in WWI, Tsar Nicholas II’s incompetence, and rising revolutionary spirits intensified into the massive, growing disparity between Russia’s ruling elite and its hopeless masses which eventually prompted the Russian revolution of 1917.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The 1905 revolution was the final concentrated outburst of domestic opposition, and highlighted that the regime of Tsar Nicholas II had many very serious problems. The problems he faced were not only from the peasantry and the rapidly expanding urban workforce (Industrial workers) but also from the educated middle class who were no longer willing to work towards the Tsars regime as it caused too many problem for its people. Several decades of oppression led to many political parties who no longer wanted to be unquestionably obedient to the Tsar and his autocracy. Repression under Alexander III may have had the desired effect for the short term but it also aroused resentment and bitterness which damaged Tsarism in the long term, forcing Tsar Nicholas II to face them.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been many cases throughout history for why revolutions have occurred. A harsh government, an unfair and favored higher class, debt, agriculture, freedom, and etc. In 1910-1920 the Mexican revolution became the center of attention in what now is El Paso, Texas. Before the revolution since 1876, Porfirio Diaz was the dictator of Mexico. Diaz was the type of ruler who had too much power and abused the power to commit brutal actions. In doing so he generated conditions in which his political opponents soon enough felt over the edge. Due to Diaz’ harsh government, the war was starting to be the start of the revolution. But was it necessary? The Mexican revolution was necessary to change the oppressive government, grievance of the peons…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Russian people were unhappy with the conditions they were forced to live in and that is why there was a need for a Revolution. However, the cause of the terrible conditions was World War I, as well as the Czar’s refusal to take Russia out of the war. Russia lost two million men in the first year of WWI, they were outgunned and outmanned, losing horribly. The Russian common people rioted, they wanted out of the war that they did not care about they wanted to stop, the hunger and the death of their people. This unrest was the first step to the revolution in Russia, Nicholas II finally stepped down to placate the people and that is when the revolution truly…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays