Preview

“Trifles” Formalist Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
784 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
“Trifles” Formalist Analysis
“Trifles” Formalist Analysis

Most people tend to presume when they really don’t have any evidence of something being true. It is that “for sure” feeling that people get that allows them to make presumptions. False presumptions can create certainty where it should not be. It is that image or symbolism that reveals the truth; therefore, truth is in the eye of the beholder. Throughout the play, “Trifles”, the accused murderer is on trial by a jury of her peers. In the play “Trifles”, by Susan Glaspell, the theme of trifling presumptions by the women and men is strengthened by the elements of imagery and symbolism.
Evidence that reveals how Glaspell used imagery to allow the men to create trifling presumptions is the discovery of Mr. Wright in the bed dead with the rope around his neck. The queer looking widow downstairs rocking back and forth without any concern of the present did not persuade the men to think anything different. This is a fine example of when that “for sure” feeling can allow someone to presume what may or may not have happened. “Who did this Mrs. Wright?” asked Harry. “I don’t know,” she says. “You don’t know?” says Harry” (Glaspell 232). Unless she was willing to admit that she murdered her husband, she was guilty. “We must ‘a looked as if we didn’t see how that could be, for after a minute she said, “I sleep sound” (Glaspell 233). It seems to be Glaspell’s intention not to provide any proof of whether or not she murdered him. Of course, proof is not needed for the men to make their presumptions of what did or did not happen.
Along with imagery, Glaspell uses symbolism to allow the men to make trifling presumptions about Mrs. Wright’s character. The pleating of her apron while rocking back in forth in the rocking chair with a queer look was symbolism of the loss of her ability to feel emotion. It is evidence of her emotional and mental detachment from her husband long before he died. It is not possible for anyone to show concern where concern

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The jury is sent to a hot, crowded room to deliberate. Before any formal discussion, they cast a vote. Eleven of the jurors vote “guilty.” Only one juror votes “not guilty.” That juror, who is known in the script as Juror #8 is the protagonist of the play. As the tempers flare and the arguments begin, the audience learns about each member of the jury. And slowly but surely, Juror #8 guides the others toward a verdict of “Not Guilty.”…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    At the beginning of the story, the narrator has been confined to a yellow-room nursery by her husband, with the thought that confinement and isolation would solve her post-partem depression. As the story progresses, she comes to believe that there are women trying to escape the wallpaper. She then realizes that like the women, she needs to escape her confinement and her husband’s grasp. When her husband discovers her, he faints. The narrator then continues to move around the room, and states, “Now why should that man have fainted? But he did, and right across my path by the wall, so that I had to creep over him every time!” (27). Gilman’s tone is notably ironic because her narrator’s reaction to her husband fainting reveals both mockery and madness. The narrator is mocking her husband’s lack of masculinity due to him fainting in front of a girl. As a man, her husband should have taken action and used physical force to restrain his wife. However, he chose to faint at the sight of his wife, demonstrating that he has lost the power to a woman, which at…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is inevitable that the jurors own personal experiences affect their opinion on the innocence of the defendant. It is these personal experiences, which threaten the defendants right to ‘a fair trial’ at the danger of a juror’s personal bias ‘obscur[ing] the truth.’ Juror 3 is depicted as the juror with the most prejudice throughout the play, consistent with the vote of ‘guilty’ as he relates the defendant to his own son who he describes as a ‘rotten kid.’ This illustrates the danger that personal bias has on the justice system, as the defendant is being adjudicated by juror 3 on his age and gender rather than the merits of the case. Prejudice is also displayed by juror 10 who see’s the accused as ‘trash’ due to his ‘slums’ background, this…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Set in the sweltering summer of 1954, Reginald Rose's socially insightful play "Twelve Angry Men", illustrates the dangers of a justice system that relies on twelve individuals to reach a "life or death" decision with collective states of minds hindered by "personal prejudice". At the conception of the play, rose explores the idea that doubt is a harder state of mind than certainty by portraying doubt, in the guilt of the boy, as a minority view within the courtroom. However, as the play progresses a seed of doubt is planted and the importance of self prejudice hindering the verdict is removed, making it harder for the jurors to hold their certainty in their guilty verdict.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Love, hate, fair and foul are tightly entwined around the core of drama. Although they are extreme opposite, they blur together to create the perfect partnership, which allows characters to appear different to their internal feelings. Whether it’s through the ‘barbed banter’ of ‘Much Ado About Nothing’ or the ‘saucy doubts and fears’ of Macbeth, Shakespeare presents scenarios where central characters place their credence where they should have agnosticism and their doubts where they should act with surety.…

    • 1911 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The significance of the title of the play, “A Jury of Her Peers” is fitting because it is about a woman that is going to be judged for the murder of her husband by her peers. How her life was with him was going to give her motive for her actions. The play, titled “Trifles”, written by Glaspell is also significant to the story because it explains how a small thing like the bird being killed relates to Mrs. Wrights life. The bird was a literary metaphor. The bird singing brought happiness to Minnie’s house and life. When her husband strangled the bird he had also strangled Minnie by not allowing her to make friends outside the house. “Trifles”, is a better title for when the story was written, but not so much for today’s times, because this…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Henderson goes around the kitchen, making comments that belittle the women in terms of how they are only concerned with tiny thingsthat relate to their kitchens. It becomes clear at this point that the women notice things that the men don’t because they are too busy to criticize. For instance, the women notice that Mrs. Wright had bread set, an important detail because it shows what she was doing before the murder. Another instance is when the women find the quilt Minnie Wright was working on and wonder if she was going to knot or quilt it. The men laugh at this; they do not realize that this too reveals a very important piece of evidence. Most of the quilt is very neat and perfect but all of a sudden there is a piece that is made poorly, revealing that Mrs. Wright was not her usual careful self.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    She thinks to herself, “I didn’t want to bring up how I has offered Dee (Wangero) a quilt when she went away to college. Then she had told me they were old-fashioned, out of style”(320). The mother is in disbelief at Dee, who only wants to use her heritage as something for show and tell. Those same blankets she had once refused she now wanted because they fit her own aesthetic, and not at all for the value and meaning behind those quilts. The mother then decides to do something unheard of and, “hugged Maggie to me, then dragged her on into the room, snactched the quilts out of Miss Wangero’s hands and dumped them into Maggie’s lap”(321). The mom has chosen her true heritage over the false, glamorized one that her eldest daughter has decided to create. She gives the quilts to Maggie because in her heart she knows that Miss Wangero does not deserve them, that Maggie can truly appreciate them and know who she is and where she’s come…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Glaspell’s Trifles, the canary and its subsequent death assists in an explanation of why Mrs. Wright acts the way she does and also provides a way to compare her before her marriage to after getting married. Before marriage, Mrs. Wright had been a sweet and pretty girl known throughout town for her pleasant disposition. Yet, as Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale point out, “[Mrs. Wright] used to sing. He killed that, too” (Glaspell 1012). This emphasizes…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inequality in Trifles

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The play “Trifles” by Susan Glaspell takes place in a bleak, untidy kitchen of a farmhouse. Farmer John Wright has been murdered and his wife, Minnie Wright, is taken into custody as a suspect to his murder. Sheriff Peters and County Attorney George Henderson pride themselves on their powers of detection and logical reasoning. They begin searching through the house trying to find any sort of evidence. But it is the two women, Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale, who discover the trifles in which is the key evidence that the men are looking for. Because this story is set in the twentieth century community, the men take no concern in what the women have to say or do. By the end of this play, the women decide not to tell them men of the evidence they found in the farmhouse since the men believe that they are superior. In the play “Trifles”, Glaspell shows us that the men have the role of being head of everything and how the women do not get as fairly treated.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though the symbolism Glaspell uses in “A Jury of Her Peers” represents the oppression of women by men that use of symbolism provides the readers the freedom to interpret the story in their own way. The broken stove, the broken birdcage, and lastly the bird all symbolize the completely different aspects of the personalities and overall relationship between Mrs. and Mr. Wright. The death of Mr. Wright sets Mrs. Wright free, even if she is in…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men - 1

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Prejudice is seen as one crucial issue in constituting a verdict for the jury, as two of the jurors are biased against the suspect of the murder. Language and characterisation of the jurors is crucial techniques in which Reginald uses to convey the bitterness of one of the jurors, Juror #10. In the play, he states “Look, you know how these people lie! It's born in them!” halfway through the play, displaying his racial prejudice towards the suspect of murder; generalising slum people as those who “…you cannot trust”. The use of characterisation and speech, allows the audience to recognise the prejudice in the jury some that is justifiable. Tension is also another dramatic technique used to convey the Juror #3 bias against the boy because of his own relationship with his son who “…didn’t know how to fight”. This technique shows the conflicts between him and Juror #8; every time Juror #8 brings up an argument, Juror #3 always rebuts with biased statements, bringing the tension up. However, this tension is always brought down by some a change in stage direction. Shown in ACT II, Juror #2 “moves to the window” after arguing with Juror #8; allowing the play’s audience to perceive Juror #8 as someone who is not biased against the murder suspect, displaying him as someone who was doing the right thing.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Examples Of Social Norms

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The play begins with a criminal investigation taking place at the home of Mr. and Mrs. Wright. Mr. Wright was found dead in their bed with a rope around his neck, with his wife being the largest suspect. Mr. Henderson, the county attorney, Mr. Peters, the sheriff, and Mr. Hale, a neighbor and friend to Mr. Wright, gather around discussing the matter, while Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale stand off to the side, patiently waiting to be a help to personal connection if the men see fit (1362). Throughout the story, the men make light of any problem or important matter that the women may have, or have to offer. They initially notice how dirty and untidy Mrs. Wrights home is, and because this is very unordinary for the women of that time period, 1916, that made Mrs. Wright that much more suspicious. The men also bring up that though Mrs. Wright is held for murder, she is too busy worrying about her perseveres, an unimportant matter to any of the men (1365). Glaspell connected her title with the theme of her story with a comment made by one of her male characters, Mr. Hale, "Well, women are used to worrying over trifles". As though any problem, or worry a women may have is unimportant and exaggerated compared to any "real" issue, that a man might have. Near the end of the story, the women feel sympathetic towards Mrs. Wright for they know how it feels to be a women and they feel that perhaps her actions were justified, for her husband did strangle her beloved bird. Though they have gathered much evidence to close the case, the men do not feel as if their input will be worthy of solving the…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Doubt

    • 814 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Shanley’s thought-provoking, multi-faceted play, Doubt, can be described simply as a battle of diametrically opposed wills and belief systems (mainly that of Sister Aloysius and Father Flynn), appropriately staged primarily in a “court-room style” setting. Those reading and watching the play are, in a way, forced to come to terms with and confront their principle beliefs as they grapple with the enigmatic concepts of judgment, morality, and of course, doubt. In the contest of wills that ensues as the play progresses following the aspersions cast upon Father Flynn by Sister Aloysius, Doubt calls to attention the difficulties of navigating one’s way in a modern world enveloped in dramatic changes and moral dilemmas. By not making clear who the protagonist and antagonist of the story are, and who in fact is in the right, Shanley instead endorses a complete, bold rejection of absolutes—of all that is dogmatic, straightforward, and black and white. One scene that encapsulates the play’s central theme of conflicting mental practices, those of dogmatism/certainty and doubt, occurs early on in the play, when Sister Aloysius is speaking with Sister James about the way in which she should teach and conduct herself in front of her students.…

    • 814 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    guidance. Rather, Kant tests these moral concerns in practice and in doing so we discover that the charge of empty-formalism does not withstand careful scrutiny.…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays