Law- Offer and Acceptance Enforcement of promises Criteria: 1. Offer and corresponding Acceptance 2. Consideration 3. Intention to create legal relationship 4. Certainty I. Formative elements – will theory of K Offer - an expressionof willingness to contract upon certain terms – binding upon acceptance Requisites: (a) Offer will become binding upon acceptance; and [may be prepared to sell] (b) Nothing further remains to be done If no an offer‚ what is it?
Premium Contract Offer and acceptance Invitation to treat
FORMATION OF A CONTRACT OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE For a contract to be valid‚ firstly there must be an AGREEMENT between the parties i.e. one party must make an OFFER which is UNCONDITIONALLY ACCEPTED by the other. OFFER What is an offer ? An offer is a promise that the person making the offer (known as the offeror) is prepared to be legally bound upon specified terms – he is making a statement of the terms on which he is prepared to be legally bound‚ for example A
Premium Contract Offer and acceptance Option contract
EBay’s strategic decision on the acquisition of PayPal Introduction: Aim of this report is to critically analyse EBay’s strategic decision on the acquisition of PayPal before it occurred. The report will analyse the company and its operating environment‚ this analysis will discuss the external and internal factors‚ of EBay and the implications of their environment in relation to the factors analysed. This in-depth analysis will be aided with analytical tools such as PESTLE‚ SWOT‚ and the use
Premium Electronic commerce Strategic management SWOT analysis
Introduction Offer and Acceptance Introduction: For a contract to be legally binding there needs to be 4 ingredients: 1. Offer 2. Acceptance 3. Intention to create legal relations 4. Consideration Building on this‚ in order to prove that a contract is legally binding 5 things need to be proven: 1. That an agreement has been reached. This is usually done by demonstrating that one of the parties has made an offer which the other accepted. 2. The agreement has been
Premium Contract
College Babarmahal‚ Kathmandu Nepal History of McDonald’s They have amazing story of their own organization relative with the organizational learning they have really gained insight from their history which later on made a lot of contribution for what now is MacDonald’s I would like to elaborate their story with two divisions and one of them Is early history and another after 90’s history. Early History When the MacDonald’s family back in 1930s around 90 years back they moved from Manchester to
Premium Hamburger Fast food Customer
parties enforceable by law 1. OFFER: Ben has contacted Ting in the subject matter of identifiable object GTX which Ting had inspected two days ago‚ he clearly mentioned terms and conditions i.e. $30‚000 cash and showed an intention to be bound by these terms and conditions 1(Harvy v Facey‚ Graw 6th ed‚ pg 41). 2. MERE INQUIRY: Ting didn’t accept or reject Ben’s offer and inquired about the spare parts which is infact a mere inquiry rather than counter offer as Ting has not put forward any
Premium Contract
There are so many stories in the Lakota values‚ and they all go way deeper than you think. The stories of respect can lead right into a story of bravery. The stories of love can lead to truth. The stories of fortitude can turn into bravery. You can visualize these values and the stories within the values so well because they are told so well. Respect‚ Love‚ and Fortitude‚ are the ones that sounded like they would be the best ones to write about because you can hear and tell them to the younger generation
Premium Native Americans in the United States United States Lakota people
An ‘invitation to treat’ refers to a term in contract law. Importantly‚ it is not the same as an ‘offer’ and it is crucial to distinguish between the two concepts. In order for a binding contract to be formed‚ there must be an ‘offer’ and an ‘acceptance’ of that offer. An invitation to treat is sometimes mistaken for an offer. There are many similarities between an invitation to treat and offer‚ so making the distinction can be difficult. If the validity of your contract turns on this distinction
Premium Contract Offer and acceptance
What is values clarification? Howard Kirschenbaum (Co-Director of Sagamore Institute and Executive Director of the National Coalition for Democracy in Education‚ Sarasota Springs New‚ York) says: I think the basic thing that values clarification does — which is to identify an important issue that has value dimensions and to provide an effective way for young people to identify their own beliefs and feelings on this issue and to share these and to interact with others — is something that is a part
Premium Morality Philosophy of life Thought
Fazeel Question 1 (15 marks) For this case the major issue is whether a valid contract is made between Tina and Yatie‚ and whether the the offer by Yatie was revoked or not. According to (Miller & Jentz‚ 2010) every contract will involve atleast two parties. That is the offeror and the offeree. The offerer is the party who makes the offer‚ and the offeree is the person to whom the offer is made to. OFFER As per (Clarkson‚ Miller‚ Jentz‚ & Cross‚ 2009) an offer is a promise or commitment
Premium Contract Offer and acceptance