Legal Analysis Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Company Facts In 1972 a Ford Pinto‚ purchased six months prior‚ unexpectedly stalled on the freeway in California. The Pinto was hit from behind by a Ford Galaxy‚ erupting into flames instantly. The driver of the car‚ Lilly Gray‚ suffered from fatal burns and died a few days later in the hospital. The passenger‚ a 13-year old boy named Richard Grimshaw‚ was also severely injured from burns‚ which caused his face and body to be permanently disfigured. After
Premium Ford Pinto Tort Negligence
Lashari | Operational Management National University-Fast | ATLAS HONDA | Preface Acknowledgement We would like to thank Mr. Amjad for his continued support in completing the project and convinced our abilities‚ enthusiasm and energy will secure a successful future. This learning experience from this project will further help us in throughout in educational career Table of Contents Preface 3 Acknowledgement 4 Introduction 6 INTRODUCTION COMPANY Profile Atlas Honda
Premium Honda Motorcycle
Part II - Ford Motor Company Rocio Rodriguez MGT/521 Management May 25‚ 2011 Nickolas Skelton Business Analysis Part I - Ford Motor Company Henry Ford and a group of investors founded what is known as the Ford Motor Company in 1903 based out in Dearborn‚ Michigan. The entrepreneur began manufacturing all of the automotive parts used in production and started the innovation of a moving assembly line to mass produce vehicles that are affordable to the public. Although the company changed names
Premium Ford Motor Company Automotive industry
Incorporate is a leading manufacturer of personal computers and notebook computers. The company is into research‚ design‚ development‚ manufacture and distribution of IT products worldwide. The company markets Acer brand products‚ including mobile and desktop personal computers‚ servers and storage‚ LCD monitors‚ projectors‚ high-definition TVs‚ peripherals and e-business solutions throughout the world. The company principally offers its products under four key brands which are Acer‚ Gateway‚ Packard
Premium Management Taipei Dell
Finance Case Study 1 Butler Lumber Company 王金明 1101289036 杜雪川1101289033 杜金鹏 1101289039 周 杨 1101289040 Abstract In this report‚ we study the case of Butler Lumber Company and analyze the financing problem it was confronted. In the first part‚ we give a brief description of the company‚ including the development process‚ equity structure‚ several important financial ratios which shows the basic conditions of the firm. Then we talk about the dilemma the company was facing and give some questions
Premium Financial ratios Financial ratio Balance sheet
Any successful business owner or investor is constantly evaluating the performance of the companies they are involved with‚ comparing historical figures with its industry competitors‚ and even with successful businesses from other industries. To complete a thorough examination of any company’s effectiveness‚ however‚ more needs to be looked at than the easily attainable numbers like sales‚ profits‚ and total assets. Luckily‚ there are many well-tested ratios out there that make the task a bit less
Premium Management Strategic management Employment
corporations. The following analysis will look at the Ford Motor Company’s disclosures relating to the company’s current assets of cash equivalents‚ inventory‚ and receivables. Disclosures can be found in the Ford Motor Company’s financial statements and they will help the readers to have a better understanding of the financial data. The sections of the company’s disclosures will be analyzed in detail throughout this paper. The Ford Motor Company uses a table of contents titled Financial Content for
Premium Finance Economics Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
bias was bases for the 2001 class action lawsuit of Streeter et al. vs. Ford Motor Co and Siegel et al. vs. Ford Motor Co. for possible age bias. The legal accusations of gender and race claims were dismissed in the Streeter lawsuit but age was still a legal accusation. Ford Motor Co. denied any legal accusations of wrong actions in either lawsuit (The Union Times‚ 2001). “The reverse-discrimination lawsuits claimed that Ford ’s employee evaluation system preferred candidates of diversity -- mainly
Premium Discrimination United States Affirmative action
Chapter 8: Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Company Caption: Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Company Citation: California Court of Appeals‚ Fourth District‚ 1981 174 Cal. Rptr. 348 Facts: 1. Ford developed a new model‚ later to be known as the pinto‚ changing the design drastically. 2. Ford discovered that the fuel tanks position was in a ’vulnerable place’ and the car failed to met crash safety standards. 3. Ford was aware of the small cost to help the fuel tanks meet standards but refused to
Premium Ford Motor Company Ford Pinto
Report In August 2000‚ Ford Motor Company and Firestone Tire Company recalled 6.5 Million ATX and AT tires that had been installed on Ford’s Explorer model SUV. At the time‚ it appeared as though Ford and Firestone were doing the right thing. They had found out that the tread separated on Ford Explorers in states with intense heat‚ such as Florida and Texas. However‚ it later came to light that both Ford and Firestone had known about these problems earlier than 2000 and that Ford had even had a similar
Premium Ford Motor Company