the United States’ history‚ the Supreme Court has decided many cases. Their job is to decide whether or not laws‚ or punishments given by lower courts‚ abide by the rules written in the United States Constitution. Their decisions are based upon precedents set by other court cases‚ or their opinions of what the Constitution means‚ if there is no precedent. On the topic of the rights of minors‚ the Supreme Court has justly protected these rights as shown in the cases of In Re Gault‚ Tinker v. Des Moines
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution First Amendment to the United States Constitution
and the case went to the Supreme Court. One of the members of the Supreme Court was the recently appointed Chief Justice John Marshall. Appointing the men to be Justices of the Piece was with in Adams constitutional rights as president. John Marshall says “ The constitution is either a superior paramount law‚ unchangeable by ordinary means‚ or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts and‚ like other acts‚ is alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it. If the former part of the
Premium United States Constitution United States Law
Law enforcement officers in the United States often perform “Terry stops”‚ as part of the work routinely associated with police patrol. In policing the term “Terry Stops” which refers to the “stop and frisk” practice‚ was coined in 1968‚ and derives from the Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio‚ 392 U.S. 1(1968) . In that landmark case‚ it was ruled that the Fourth Amendment constitutional right‚ made applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment‚ that prohibits “unreasonable searches and
Premium Police Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Terry v. Ohio
Eyewitness Identification In the Supreme Court case of Lorenzo Prado Navarette and Jose Prado Navarette‚ Petitioners‚ versus the state of California (argued January 21‚ 2014‚ decided April 22‚ 2014)‚ two men argued that one of their constitutional rights had been violated. In August of 2008‚ a Mendocino County dispatcher received a call from a woman reporting that another vehicle had run her off the road (Navarette v. California‚ 2014). The dispatcher notified the California Highway Patrol (CHP)
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Suspect
4th Amendment The Fourth Amendment is a very important element of the United States Constitution. This Amendment has been the solutions to several Supreme court cases‚ such as Terry v. Ohio‚ Cupp v. Murphy‚ and Florida v. Jardines. This amendment also codifies various statutes. Terry v. Ohio (1968) was a court case led by a conflict between a group of men and Officer McFadden. Officer McFadden was patrolling downtown Cleveland‚ when he noticed a group of men suspiciously wandering around. He decided
Premium
Clarence Thomas is the second colored male justice to serve on the U.S Supreme Court. I wanted to write about Clarence Thomas because i was fascinated how he overcame racial barriers‚ why he rarely asked questions in court‚ also his opinion as a U.S Supreme Court justice. I wanted to write about Clarence Thomas because‚ he overcame racial boundaries. Clarence Thomas spoke at a small gathering of students about his previous racism he remembers experiencing when leaving his native south. “The worst
Premium African American Black people Race
HSM-240 CheckPoint: Court Decisions Judge stalls Mich. drug testing program for welfare applicants. Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly‚ 10421394‚ 11/22/99‚ Vol. 11‚ Issue 45 I chose this one because of personal experience in the state of Virginia where I live‚ before EBT cards that we use now to buy food with before we got food stamps and the where half the value on the street where you could get cash or drugs. Almost all the public housing residents also received food stamps and you believe
Premium Drug addiction Drug United States
The Catholic Church and Supreme Court Cases The Catholic Church and the Supreme Court have had many disputes along the lines of‚ our very tested‚ religious freedom. There are quite a few Supreme Court cases that affect the Catholic Church. Roe v. Wade‚ Obergefell v. Hodges‚ and Zubik v. Burwell‚ are three of the many important and recent cases that are affecting this generation and will continue affecting future generations. These three Supreme Court cases have tested the Catholic Church’s teachings
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Christianity
The United States v. Virginia court case was debated on Jan 17‚ 1996 at Virginia Military Institute. The advocates involved were Paul Bender‚ who argued the case for the United States and Theodore B. Olson‚ who argued the case on behalf of Virginia. The U.S was the petitioner‚ while Virginia was the accused. According to "FindLaw’s United States Supreme Court Case and Opinions.” the case was about Virginia Military Institute violating the fourteenth Amendments of Equal Protection by maintaining a
Premium
Landmark Supreme Court Case Project Dredd Scott v. Sandford 1857 In the Dred Scott case‚ Scott filed for a lawsuit to gain freedom for him and his family. He was once obtained a slave in a slave state‚ but his master had moved around and ended up in Illinois‚ which had been a free state in 1836. His rights that were being withheld from him were freedom. The way they pleaded their case was that he lived in a territory where slavery was illegal; therefore he can’t be enslaved again. Scott lost
Free Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution