judge is giving instructions to the jurors on the murder case. It is stated that if the young man is found guilty‚ he will be charged with a mandatory sentence of the death penalty. It is now up to the twelve men to determine if this young man should be sentenced to death. The twelve men then file into the jury room and sit in exact order as given in court. They proceed to take a vote by stating whether they think the individual is guilty of committing murder. Starting with Juror # 1 and continuing
Premium Decision making Verdict Jury
Twelve Angry Men This was a meeting of 12 jurors to deliberate the fate of an eighteen year old boy. The meeting was more of a verbal structure. The jury foreman was the team leader of the meeting. I feel as though the beginning of the meeting started strong with his decision of voting for guilty or innocence that lead to a hung jury. There was no planning really or discussing the trial at the beginning‚ and the jurors did not work together in a timely manner. The presentation of evidence
Premium Jury
Juror # 1: He is the foreman on this jury. He takes his role very seriously but is seen at times to lose control of the proceedings of the group of jury members that he is supposed to oversee. Juror # 2: He seems to be the most timid and nervous member of the jury. He is easily swayed by the opinion of others. Juror # 3: He is the most vociferous member of the jury. He has some very strong opinions which at times appear to not be backed by any logic. His character shows some signs of sadism ingrained
Premium
Twelve Angry Men is a classic movie depicting how one determined leader can alter an entire crowd. Through dedication‚ curiosity‚ and the pursuit for the truth he is able to persuade a group of twelve to second guess even themselves. Within this heterogynous group are a dozen different personalities - some of which were leaders and most of which were not. The strongest leader in this movie by far is the Architect in the White Suit. Right off from the beginning at the original vote the Architect
Premium Jury 12 Angry Men Man
Twelve Angry Men – Analysis Questions Act one‚ Pg 1-13 1. What is the setting of the drama and what is its significance? The story is set in the jury room in New York City. The significance is to emphasize the drama but to specifically illustrate how the 12 Jurors become irritated by one another due to the confined spaced and heated arguments that symbolically occur. 2. What are the judge’s instructions to the jury? What is the charge against the defendant? The Jurors are asked to “…try
Premium Jury
Book Critique: Twelve Angry Men‚ Reginald Rose and David Mamet The criminal justice system of the United States‚ when first framed through the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights‚ was a revolutionary breakthrough in contemporary peace-keeping. For fear of becoming like their former governing nation - wherein unreasonable trials were held in such a way that numerous individuals accused of criminal acts were not offered a opportunity to demonstrate their innocence or‚ in some cases‚ a trial by jury
Premium Law United States Jury
I have made some notes here” and “I have been listening very closely” so that shows how much attention he pays and how he sticks to the facts. He has received prejudice and stereotyping for being German and is bullied by the other jurors. On page 12 he says‚ “This sensitivity I understand” when the 5th juror reveals how he’s lived in a slum all his life. 11th juror relates to this because of the prejudice he’s received. 7th juror bullies him on page 44 when he says‚ “I’ll knock his goddamn Middle
Premium Bullying Jury Abuse
A classic jury-room drama‚ 12 angry men follows a jury’s decision-making process in a murder trial‚ tracking the gradual changing of 11 of the 12 jurors’ minds about their verdict. 12 angry men is set in New York in 1957 and the entire action of the play takes place on one hot afternoon and evening in the jury room of a court of law. The two single scene acts cover exactly the period of time of the jurors’ discussion. The action is continuous with no change of location‚ which contributes to the
Premium Jury Court Not proven
12 Angry Men 1. The most effective critical thinker in 12 Angry Men is Henry Fonda’s character‚ Davis or Juror number eight. Davis really supported and stood by all of his decisions and examined the evidence thoroughly. He not only looked at the situation through his eyes‚ but also through the young boy’s and witnesses spectrums. Davis was in no hurry to decide‚ which gave him time to really sit down and weigh out all the options and proof or non-proofs. He also did his own research by going
Free Critical thinking Logic Evidence
Critical Thinking Exercise based on “Twelve Angry Men” (Developed by P. Bishop) 12 Angry Men (and in those days‚ 1957‚ it was all men!) is an outstanding dramatization of critical thinking. The story is simple: A teen-age boy is accused of murdering his father. The evidence against him seems indisputable‚ at least to 11 of the 12 men on the jury. The 12th man‚ however‚ (Henry Fonda‚ the hero) wants to “talk about it.” You get the idea. The case revolves around four or five pieces of evidence
Premium Henry Fonda Critical thinking Murder