A number of jurors attempt to influence the decision‐making process. Using the above framework‚ explain why the architect (Juror 8) is so much more effective than the others. Henry Fonda‚ who works as an architect is considered to be a consciousness person‚ a man with values and commitment to the task assigned to him. During the trial Henry Fonda juror number 8‚ had serious doubts about the defendant’s lawyer and the evidence presented in the case. Henry believed the lawyer did not pressure or weaken the prosecution witnesses
Premium Jury Grand jury Critical thinking
(3) ‘12 angry men’ movie review: The movie portrays the After the jurors go to the meeting room to discuss and arrive at consensus whether the young boy is guilty or not‚ we get to see different personalities combined to form a group to resolve the issue. Initially 11 out of 12 jurors voted in favour of boy being guilty. Therefore‚ first prominent thing I noticed was that there was lack of conviction about the criticality of the issue. People had already formed their judgement before they stepped
Premium Psychology Critical thinking Social psychology
In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose‚ Juror 4 undergoes a series of questions regarding his confidence that a young man is guilty of murder. From the beginning to the end of the play‚ Juror 4 gradually changes his mind about his initial vote‚ through the constructive discussions lead by Juror 8. Juror 4 moves from a belief that all legal witnesses are faultless to truly experiencing some sort of “reasonable doubt.” He is left with a clearer picture of the case‚ looking beyond his personal
Premium Jury Not proven Verdict
whole jury votes guilty but one‚ Henry Fonda‚ or juror eight‚ and so the jury is forced to talk it out and make a decision. The other eleven jurors aren’t caring enough to sit out and talk it out‚ Henry Fonda tries to get as much evidence as he can to persuade the jurors that there is a possibility that the boy is guilty. Slowing he convinces them‚ one by one. While we are unsure whether he is right or wrong‚ 8th Juror is one of the only jurors who is unaffected by any kind of negative bigotries
Premium Jury Not proven Academy Award for Best Actor
Martin Balsam (The Foreman) (Juror 1) Age: Late 30’s Early 40’s Job: Assistant Coach Very simple well organized man‚ kept things in line. Didn’t have much to say throughout the meeting. He enjoys coaching football seems to be the only time he is at ease is when he was talking about football. He was not faced with much conflict directed at him‚ but he seemed to keep the peace and didn’t want any problems. 5.5 He’s in a way quiet‚ he doesn’t have any resentment or say hurtful things to others
Premium Management Employment Organization
Mcqueen SPCM 8:00a MWF April 17‚ 2006 Communication Analysis Paper 12 Angry Men For an in-depth look into the workings of small groups few movies have offered more than the beloved classic‚ 12 Angry Men. A small group is defined as group of approximately 5 to 12 people who share a common purpose and follow similar organizing rule. 12 Angry Men‚ as its title suggests‚ depicts a story of exactly 12 men who form such a group. The movie opens in the first state of Group Development
Premium Not proven Verdict Jury
selection. In many states they add the list of driver’s license and telephone directories to the juror pool which is how jurors get summons with a specific date and time. Other states add government list such as tax rolls and people who receive unemployment or food stamps however it is all random selection. Everyone has the right to trial and jurors are essential to this process. In order for a juror to get selected they must be citizens that are register to vote‚ are over the age of 18‚ they have
Premium United States Crime Law
because of their own personal reasons and prejudice feelings towards the case.One reason why a person should be innocent until proven guilty is because not all witnesses testify the truth or are not completely accurate.As seen in the film”Twelve Anger Men”.The testimony of the old man that lives in the same apartment building with the boy that’s on trail seems to be believable.The old man testified that he heard what
Premium Crime Jury Black people
Theme of Prejudice in the Film 12 Angry Men By Brendan O’Regan St Kevin’s CBS Arklow Anyone doing the treating the issue of prejudice in R.E. class will find 12 Angry Men a valuable resource‚ though there isn’t any overt faith element. I find using individual short scenes to be the best approach – time to show and discuss within one class period. I have chosen what I consider to be five key scenes that illustrate the theme effectively – even to do three of them would provide a week’s work. In
Premium Prejudice Abuse
12 Angry Men‚ a 1957 film directed by Sidney Lumet‚ based off of a teleplay by Reginald Rose‚ exemplifies various forms of human communication amongst a small group of men. After the court dispute‚ the jury had been announced to their destination. Twelve strongly expressive men accumulate into a small group in the court where they will all come to a consensus on whether a boy is to be charged guilty or innocent. The group of twelve men that gathered into this small room‚ all displayed unique and
Premium Decision making Decision theory Leadership