Critical Thinking Exercise based on “Twelve Angry Men” (Developed by P. Bishop) 12 Angry Men (and in those days‚ 1957‚ it was all men!) is an outstanding dramatization of critical thinking. The story is simple: A teen-age boy is accused of murdering his father. The evidence against him seems indisputable‚ at least to 11 of the 12 men on the jury. The 12th man‚ however‚ (Henry Fonda‚ the hero) wants to “talk about it.” You get the idea. The case revolves around four or five pieces of evidence
Premium Henry Fonda Critical thinking Murder
Important Characters in 12 Angry Men In 12 Angry Men‚ juror number three is a man of strong opinions‚ very little patience‚ and a strong annoyance of the whole trial taking place and the other people involved. To start of the play‚ juror number three shows his impatience by complaining‚ “Six days. They should have finished in two. Talk‚ talk‚ talk. Did you ever heard so much talk about nothing?” (page 3). Throughout the play‚ different sides of juror number three come out to be seen by the audience
Premium Jury Not proven Verdict
I have made some notes here” and “I have been listening very closely” so that shows how much attention he pays and how he sticks to the facts. He has received prejudice and stereotyping for being German and is bullied by the other jurors. On page 12 he says‚ “This sensitivity I understand” when the 5th juror reveals how he’s lived in a slum all his life. 11th juror relates to this because of the prejudice he’s received. 7th juror bullies him on page 44 when he says‚ “I’ll knock his goddamn Middle
Premium Bullying Jury Abuse
Twelve Angry Men is a wonderful film that dramatizes the "imperfections" inherent in the American jury system. Simultaneously‚ it delivers the powerful message that because we are human beings and not machines‚ it is in the nature of things that justice demands such a system. At the outset‚ eleven jurors vote in favor of convicting the accused without even discussing a single shred of the evidence presented at trial. Only one brave juror refuses to vote. He openly admits that he does not know
Premium Jury Law
Persuasive Language Techniques 1. Attacks Attacks are a version of playing the man‚ not the ball. If you can make your opposition seem less credible‚ you may be more likely to get a reader to agree with your side of the argument. At the least‚ attention can be taken away from the issue itself and put on to the personality. Attacks can attempt to belittle or embarrass or just plain insult an opponent. The idea is that the weaker you can make your opposition appear‚ the stronger you and your contention
Premium Rhetoric Persuasion Social psychology
first persuasive technique used in my cartoon is exaggeration. Exaggeration is usually used for facial features but can also be used for clothing or other characteristics of someone or something. It also is usually used to represent or say something about that person or object. In this case‚ Julia Gillard’s nose is exaggerated to be like Pinocchio’s nose. It represents the time when Gillard lied about the carbon tax and so her nose grew to be like Pinocchio. The second persuasive technique used was
Premium Democracy United States Government
"Its not easy to stand alone against the ridicule of others". Twelve Angry Men is more than a play‚ it is a reminder of our social responsibility. Discuss. Twelve Angry Men is a legal drama‚ written by Reginald Rose during the heightened period of 1950’s McCarthyism. The didactic play presents a cross section‚ examining 1950’s America during a period of immense suspicion and uncertainty. Roses’ play reminds us of the importance of responsibility and integrity‚ emphasising qualities such as courage
Premium Jury Verdict
Characterization plays a major part in most movies‚ this is what gives the audience insights into a characters personality. The film 12 Angry Men relies more heavily on the use of characterization than any other movie I can think of. Due to the lack of special effects and because the film takes place almost entirely in a small jury room the development of characters was key. This star studded cast of actors included such names as: Henry Fonda‚ Lee J. Cobb‚ and Ed Begley‚ even the guy
Premium John Cavil Not proven Jury
New witnesses are found and enough evidence is gathered to take three new men (all bystanders who encouraged the rape) to trial. In the beginning of the trial‚ Tobias gives her statement reliving the horrible night in great detail. Murphy questions her and a strong statement is made to the jury of what these men are capable of. The defense tries to question her‚ but makes little progress in doing so. A new dilemma is reached when the man who
Premium English-language films Character Protagonist
When massive oil giant Shell released plans to start drilling in the Arctic‚ an environmental protection group‚ Greenpeace‚ began lobbying against them on basis of environmental grounds as this plan had the real possibility of severely harming the entire Arctic ecosystem by exacerbating the melting of the ice caps and releasing toxins into the environment that would be difficult to clean (“The Dangers”). Ultimately they won by attacking Shell’s highly-credible and well-liked partner‚ Lego‚ in hopes
Premium Lego Petroleum Arctic