In what respects has the character of women’s work changed since 1918? Answer with reference to at least two countries in Europe. The character of women’s work greatly evolved throughout the twentieth century‚ both progressing and regressing at different times within this period. Working for many women in 1918 and the years before it often meant menial wages in low quality jobs or not even being allowed to work at all as women were deemed as inferior in most European societies. Unemployment benefits
Premium Gender role World War II Gender
by the people‚ for the people‚ which includes minors. Every American citizen has undeniable rights that are provided in the Constitution and that should also protect minors while they are at school and at home‚ where they should be able to express themselves without punishment as well. Ingraham v. Wright is a Supreme Court case that deals with corporal punishment at school. James Ingraham‚ a 14 year old boy‚ was taken to his principal’s office for “rowdy” behavior. As a punishment for misbehaving
Premium United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution
In the case of Katz v. United states‚ 1967‚ The FBI agents acted on a suspicion that Katz maybe transmitting gambling information over the phone to other people in other states. Katz was using a public phone booth to conduct the transactions of information ("Findlaw’s United States Supreme Court Case And Opinions."). The FBI agents then proceeded to attach an eavesdropping device to the outside of the phone booth to record his conversations. With all the recoding that the FBI could get‚ they
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Thomas Jefferson of democrat republicans beat the federalists of John Adams. One of the most historic U.S supreme court cases to begin to emerge and develop an a effect on U.S history today was the case of William Marbury‚ v. James Madison. Explaining the origins and background of the case‚ I will discuss the major constitutional issues it raised while outlining the major points of the courts decision and the significance of the decision. Including that John Adams was president in the late 1700’s
Premium
infringement‚ since Feltner no longer had the rights to the shows. In 1993 A district judge granted Columbia (represented by Henry J. Tashman and Eric M. Stahl of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP) their motion of summary judgement. At the bench trial the judge granted Columbia 8.8 million dollars in damages‚ which is about $20000 for each of the 440 episodes. Feltner took the case to the supreme court on the argument that a jury should decide the amount of damages that need to be paid. The court ruled in
Premium United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States Jury
Racial inequality has been problematic throughout American history‚ and the most disastrous outcome has been its restriction of democracy. According to W. E. B. DuBois‚ a true democracy stems around an entire population with a colorblind educational system with further emphasis on no arbitrary segregation‚ large citizen participation in the electoral process‚ and no political and economic inequality. It is incredibly apparent that this image of an ideal democracy as yet to be achieved to the constant
Premium Jim Crow laws Plessy v. Ferguson Racial segregation
Why was the Supreme Court built in 2010 and how effective has it been at upholding civil liberties? The Supreme Court was introduced in 2010 as a replacement for the House of Lords as the top law court of justice in the UK‚ Wales and Northern Ireland. This court has cost approximately 59 million pounds to build and was officially open on 1st October 2009. The enactment of the Supreme Court came about under the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (The Supreme Court [Online]‚ 2010) and currently stands
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States United States Constitution
charges of obstruction of justice by the Southern Texas District Court‚ served by Michael Chertoff. The jury believed that Arthur Andersen and its employees were in violation of 18 US Code § 1512‚ a public law which covers “tampering with a witness‚ victim‚ or an informant”5‚ due to the mass destruction of documents in anticipation of the upcoming SEC investigation. This effectively ended the company’s practice as its CPA license was taken away‚ but Andersen continued to
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Law United States
Before making the final decision the court considered the following factors‚ length of delay‚ prejudiced to the accused‚ explanation for the delay‚ and Waiver of Appellants. The Supreme Court then concluded that the delay of 2 years after the appellant’s preliminary trial was unreasonable. The Crown did not justify the institutional delay and did not prove that the
Premium
forces with the National Organization for Woman and together worked on the Brown versus Board of Education case. (ACLU) In Brown versus Board of Education‚ a compilation of four actual cases‚ the Supreme Court declared segregation in public schools unconstitutional‚ which at the time of civil rights and lingering racism was‚ for some‚ a controversial idea. (US Courts) The 1973 Supreme Court cases Roe versus Wade and Doe versus Bolton involved the argument that women held the right to privacy and therefore
Premium United States United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States