Ans: Section 2(h) of the Indian Contract Act‚ 1872 defines a contract as an agreement enforceable by law. Section 2(e) defines agreement as "everypromise and every set of promises forming consideration for each other." Section2(b) defines promise in the word: "When the person to whom the proposal ismade signifies his assent thereto‚ the proposal is said to be accepted. A proposalwhen accepted becomes a promise." From the above definition of promise‚ it is obvious that an agreement
Premium Contract
attempt to identify and explain the four elements of a valid contract‚ explain what the objective theory of contracts is and define and explain how the objective theory of contracts applies to the Unit 3 IP. This paper will also explain why I think the court held that there was not a valid contract in the scenario of the unit 3 IP as well as explain why advertisements are generally considered not to be valid offers. The four elements of a valid contract are: * There must be an agreement in
Premium Contract
"A valid contract‚ in essence‚ is the agreement between its parties". Discuss this statement and‚ using both case law and legal principles‚ comment on the essential elements of a valid contract and the importance of each. To a certain extent this statement is true but it is only one element of a valid contract to explain please find following all elements and conditions within a valid contract. To Contract: Is to enter into a relationship or agreement between two or more parties that create in
Premium Contract
There are four elements to a valid contract. 1. At least two separate parties entering into an agreement: The agreement can be between two people‚ or one person and a company or between two companies. 2. The parties are qualified to agree to the terms and conditions in the contract: The parties must be of legal age and have an understanding of what the contract is and details it outlines. 3. Both parties are receiving consideration or value from the agreement: This is most commonly
Premium Contract
Essential elements of a valid contract Introduction: In this part of my assignment I will be detailing what the different elements of a valid contract are whilst also linking it in with my own contract. The contract I have decided to use is my mobile phone contract from Vodafone. The offer: In contract law the offer is where a person will accept the invitation‚ for example in my contract the offer would be when I offer to bind into their contract and purchase a mobile phone deal‚ and this
Premium Contract
brief insight into the four elements of a valid contract as well as the objective theory of contracts. It will also explain how the objective theory of a contract applies to this case. I will try to explain why the court held that there was not a valid agreement between the company and the Seattle man. The four elements of a valid contract Contracts are used in today’s world as a major part of interaction between individuals or companies and consumers. Contracts are often used within our professional
Premium Contract
|1 of 2 | |NAME OF ASSESSOR | | |SUBMISSION DEADLINE |27th April 2009 | I‚ ______Hoang Anh Vu________ hereby confirm that this assignment is my own work and not copied or plagiarized from any source. I have referenced
Premium Contract
definitive principle of good faith in contract law. Unlike the legal systems in Europe and the United States‚ Australia does not demand an explicit legal prerequisite of good faith to form a contract.[1] Decisions in different jurisdictions have however considered the validity of the values identified in the doctrine of good faith within contract law‚ such as loyalty‚ honesty and cooperation. Good faith is valuable because it provides confidence in the formation of contracts between two parties. However
Premium Contract
The four basic elements of a valid contract are agreement‚ consideration‚ contractual capacity‚ lawful object. Objective theory of contracts is intent to enter into a contract. An example of this would be going to a car lot and say I will give you 5‚000 for this use car. This is a valid contract offer. I intend on purchasing the used car if the car lot is willing to sell the car for 5‚000. In the case of Pepsi vs. John Leonard objective theory doesn’t apply. Pepsi wasn’t truly offering the Harriet
Premium Contract
Importance of essential elements required for formation of valid contract The contract law is a situation where law is related to business transactions. In the situations good are purchased‚ sold‚ as well as moved through the contract. The employees are hired‚ land are developed‚ sold‚ bought leased or financed under the contract. Most of the businesses are based under contracts. Generally‚ the contracts represent foundation of the most of the commercial activities and therefore contract law stands for one
Premium Contract