INNOVATION AT 3M CORPORATION: CASE STUDY There are two major issues highlighted in this case study: 1. Is the ‘lead-user’ process‚ an effective method for research and subsequent product innovation? 2. Should the Medical-Surgical Markets Division (MSMD) lead-user research team present its revolutionary new approach to treating infection to senior management despite the fact that it challenged the existing business strategy? QUESTION 1 The answer to the first question is ‘yes’. By the
Premium Innovation
3M Introduction 3M is fundamentally a science-based company. We produce thousands of imaginative products‚ and we’re a leader in scores of markets - from health care and highway safety to office products and abrasives and adhesives. Our success begins with our ability to apply our technologies - often in combination - to an endless array of real-world customer needs. Of course‚ all of this is made possible by the people of 3M and their singular commitment to make life easier and better for people
Premium Health care Sustainability Social responsibility
There is no need to change basic corporate culture of innovation at 3M. 3M already has impressive internal strengths and in order to avoid further stagnation and increase company’s earnings per share more cohesive and systematic plan is needed. We would recommend the long term strategy development to increase the efficiency and competetiveness of the 3M products. 3M is fundamentally a science-based company. We produce thousands of imaginative products‚ and we’re a leader in scores of markets -
Premium
the organizational structures and devices 3M uses to encourage entrepreneurial activity. Why do they work? 3M heavily based its business on innovation and while doing this it always supported its employees in terms of being innovative. 3M also always followed the alternative ways in order to increase their profit and market share‚ and they found that one of the best ways is through organizational innovation. Therefore‚ in order to improve their business 3M developed 6 different strategies over its
Premium Innovation
Case study-The 3M Company Insert name Insert institution Insert instructor’s name Insert the date Case study-The 3M Company Initially known as the Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company‚ this company was pioneered in 1902 at Minnesota near Lake Superior. It was set up to sell mineral deposits which were later proved to be valueless and this initiated early research and development of this company while in Duluth. This saw its success in selling sandpaper products. The company later increased
Premium Corporation Globalization Multinational corporation
As to the strategy of 3M‚ the company mainly focuses on its innovation. The company improves its products through industrial‚ electronic market and transportation. The examples of the products of the company are waterproof sand paper (the company’s first product) and post-it-notes. The company performance on management is considered visionary because it offered innovative products which holds higher quality and is more convenient in the matter of usage. The CEO of the company has a rule which stated
Premium Marketing Supply and demand Innovation
3M Optical Systems: Managing Corporate Entrepreneurship MST550 – Capstone Professor Jack Raiton HBSP Case #395-017 Discussion Questions 1. What practices make 3M such an innovative company? 2. What is Any Wong’s role as the OS Unit’s general manager? How effective has he been? 3. What is Paul Guehler’s role as division vicepresident? How effective has he been? 4. What should Andy Wong do with the computer screen AFE? If he gets the AFE‚ should Guehler fund it? Case Outline • • • • • •
Premium Marketing
1. How the 3 M innovation process evolved from the time the company was found? Answer: The innovation process at 3M has typically been a focus area for the upper management. The company had taken a getoutoftheway attitude towards the product developers who in turn have worked accordingly towards innovation. Along with technicians each team had a process engineer to ensure that the product was efficiently made. The entire team did not face any risk if the product failed.
Premium Management Project management Strategic management
3M and Norton Evolutionary vs. Classical Strategic Management A Case Study from Jim Collins & Jerry Porras‚ Built to Last‚ 1997 Questions for Discussion (1) 3M’s strategy contradicts nearly everything that an MBA program is supposed to teach you about planning and control. Explain: a. How would marketing studies and product planning benefit 3M in producing more successful products? b. How 3M can expect to survive in the long run if it is unable to compute the return on investment and cash
Premium Natural selection Evolution
Unit title: BUSINESS SCM-3M-B5 ▪ Option Taken: OPTION B ▪ Assessment Criteria: OPTION B ▪ Name: MARIA ROSA MARCO CABANES ▪ IoSCM Membership Number: 01684 ▪ Your email address: rosa.marcO@LIVE.COM ▪ Assessment Criteria File 5/7 ▪ Page 1/8 Produce a piece of work which includes the following information; 1. A description of three roles
Premium Management Business Project management