Distinguish between a liability and a environmental liability. Is there any difference in the principle? A liability is a present obligation of the enterprise arising from the past events‚ the settlement of which is expected to result in an outflow from the enterprise of resources embodying economic benefits whereas An environmental liability is an obligation to pay future expenditures to remedy environmental damage that has occurred because of past events or transactions‚ or to compensate a
Premium Hazardous waste United States Environmental Protection Agency Law
listening to the same word‚ “Responsibility.” Will we let our children forego the consequences of their actions? Even if we try the Parent Liability Childs Act will prevent parents from doing so. The Parent Liability Childs Act of 2000 in California states‚ “Parents jointly and severally liable for willful misconduct causing injury‚ death or property damage.” The Parent Liability Childs Act should be appealed because if the child isn’t punished they will commit more severe crimes‚ it is extremely unfair
Premium Joint and several liability Crime Developmental psychology
No one under the age of 21 should be allowed to have tattoos. Many young adults have not completely considered the permanence of a tattoo and how it can affect their lives. This decision is threatening to one’s job‚ image‚ and life. Some jobs do not hire people who have tattoos‚ regardless of their skill in a certain field. Some employers fear that a representative of their company who has a tattoo can mislead customers or co-workers. When tattoos are exposed people look at you differently. They
Premium HIV Tattoo Body modification
project I have used doctrinal method. I have referred to various cases and tracked the development and evolution of Law of Torts. In this project I would like to discuss the evolution of constitutional torts in India. Under civil law only private individuals can be held liable. But‚ under this branch of Law Of Torts‚ the state is held liable for the injuries caused by its servants. This project deals with the cases wherein inalienable Fundamental Rights and Human Rights of the individuals have been infringed
Premium Tort Law Human rights
The Role of Testing Employees OMM618: Human Resources Management Date: 4/9/2013 Introduction The workplace testing has become increasingly popular. Employers screen their workers in an effort to try to figure out who is best for the position or for the promotion at hand. As long as a test is design to predict an employee’s actual ability to do the job. An employer can generally require typing test for clerical jobs or strength tests for position requiring those skills. Employee
Free Employment Human resources Standardized test
of school wide anti-bullying policies. In recent years the federal government has implemented the National Safe Schools Framework and the Civil Liability Act of 2002‚ to assist educators with diminishing schoolyard bullying (Campbell 64). Since the development and rise of technological resources‚ cyber-bullying has expanded the opportunity for the act of bullying to take place; bullying is no longer isolated face to face. Students’ abilities of escaping to a safe haven‚ away from their harasser
Premium Abuse Bullying Education
1. Under what circumstances are employees most likely to blow the whistle? I believe whistle blowing itself is a bold action by any individual or a group of people. I just wanted to add this before my discussion to explain my modesty towards the whistle blowers‚ only to the genuine ones. An employee is likely to blow the whistle ideally in a circumstance when they see any unethical activities occurring in their organization. It can be in a process or in the hierarchy itself but still any unethical
Premium Political corruption Business ethics Morality
Mary was injured by Peters’ act‚ is he solely liable for the accident? Law * In this case‚ we have to look at the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) to determine who was negligent and in specific‚ we use s 5B(1)‚ s 5B(2) and s 5R of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW); s 5B(1) for the reasonable foreseeability test‚ s 5B(2) for determining if the standard of reasonable care has been breached and s 5R for contributory negligence. * Where both the parties seem to have been negligent‚ it is important
Premium Tort Tort law Duty of care
Indeterminate Liability Liability is indeterminate only when the number of claims or the size of the claims cannot be realistically calculated. Therefore‚ indeterminacy depends upon what the defendant knew or ought to have known regarding the number of claimants and the nature of their likely claims. Hence‚ liability will not be imposed if it may lead to liability in an indeterminate time to an indeterminate class. In assessing indeterminacy in this case‚ 23andMe is a genome-testing organisation
Premium Free will Determinism Causality
Morning Session F. Tort Liability of Healthcare Institutions and Managed Care -Liability for Employees and Non-Employees -Vicarious Liability (pages 418-431): -Agency Law and the Test of “Control”: A. Defining “Employee” in the Hospital Setting -Hospital vicariously liable for acts of employees such as nurses‚ technicians‚ clerks‚ custodians‚ cooks‚ etc. -However‚ physicians are often independent contractors using hospital facilities via staff privileges. So‚ liability of hospitals for physician
Premium Health care Medicine Medical malpractice