“12 Angry Men” Essay The movie "12 Angry Men" focuses on a jury’s decision on a capital murder case. A 12-man jury is sent to begin decisions on the first-degree murder trial of an 18-year-old Latino accused of stabbing his father to death‚ where a guilty verdict means an automatic death sentence. The case appears to be open-and-shut: The defendant has a weak alibi; a knife he claimed to have lost is found at the murder scene; and several witnesses either heard screaming‚ saw the killing or the
Premium Critical thinking Jury Murder
unpopular opinions in this country. This is the reason I came here. I wanted to have the right to disagree. In my own country‚ I am ashamed to say-” -No. 11 (233) Reginald Rose uses his play‚ 12 Angry Men‚ to voice his personal views of democracy. The play is set in a 1950’s deliberation room where twelve men must decide on the guilt or innocence of an underprivileged boy accused of murdering his own father. The first vote reveals a resounding majority in favor of guilt‚ but‚ as the jurors take a
Premium Jury Human rights Democracy
12 Angry Men Questions Shakil Mirza April‚ 20th 2012 1. Do you think that the jury in this movie came to the right decision? Why/why not? I think that the jury in this movie came to the wrong decision‚ because I feel that all throughout the deliberation the factual evidence did not have any reasonable doubt lingering above it‚ which was the complete opposite of the opinion of juror 8‚ and gradually everyone else. While there was factual evidence presented‚ juror 8 persuaded all the
Premium Jury
Hum115 12 Angry Men The character in this movie that was the most effective critical thinker was juror 8(Henry Fonda). The types of characteristics that Fonda‚ exemplify is provisionalism‚ creativity‚ and critical thinking. By doing this he is uncover new ways of interpreting evidence‚ turns to certainty and shortsightedness when arriving at conclusions. For example‚ Fonda commented on how the boy had been slapped around all his life and was treated poorly. This kind of thinking leads to more external
Premium Critical thinking
In analyzing 12 Angry Men the first theory that came to mind is the Universal Theory of Leadership. The theory is defined as the belief that certain personal characteristics and skills contribute to leadership effectiveness in many situations. This shows true with Juror #8. Juror #8 was the architect who emerged as a real effective leader. The architect showed self-confidence and assertiveness. He convinced the jury that once all thought the young man was guilty to believing he was innocent due to
Premium Leadership Not proven Jury
The Power of Words: Conveyed in 12 Angry Men In all stories‚ plays‚ or works of literature‚ theme is a major component. Theme is the message that the author communicates to the audience‚ through the story. The most jutting theme conveyed by Reginald Rose in Twelve Angry Men is the power of words‚ and he portrays this best by the effects of the word choice of each juror‚ by using character foil in the way Juror 3 and Juror 8 present their reasons for taking their vote‚ and some verbal irony that
Premium Salem witch trials The Crucible Witchcraft
Maia Fitch 3.16.12 Mr. Oldford Block 1B 12 Angry Men Response 12 Angry Men was a very good movie to me and it had a message behind it all. The message I understood was that you should always think the options and never judge too quick. This movie was very old and can somewhat relate to what still goes on these days in the same situation. If I was one of the jurors‚ I feel as if I would’ve been like Davis and not close the case so quickly. Davis was a thinker and he didn’t want them to just
Premium Jury Cognition Trial
Moral Foundations 12 Angry Men and Morality A moral person does what is right for the group or society as a whole‚ not what is just right for themselves or one other person at any given point in time. In 12 Angry Men the voice of moral reason is clearly Juror Number 8‚ who from the beginning is the only “Not Guilty” vote because he believes they should at least talk about the court case of the Puerto Rican boy before they send him ultimately to his death. Juror 8 had integrity; he realized
Premium Jury Evidence Law
For more than half a century‚ “12 Angry Men” has served as America’s foremost cinematic self-image. It’s a terrific entertainment‚ but that alone doesn’t explain its status as one of IMDB’s perpetual top-10 films of all time (No. 6 as I write this)—an old-school‚ single-set talkathon perched incongruously among adolescent fantasies. Like Schindler’s List (No. 7)‚ it speaks powerfully to our belief that one individual with a conscience can make a real difference in the world‚ and that’s a genuinely
Premium Jury 12 Angry Men Man
Michael Bernardo 12 Angry Men Part One The Sociogram shows the dialogue between the group. It’s very obvious that Juror number 3 and Juror number 8 lead the conversation throughout the group. Number 8 engages in conversation with every person in the jury numerous times. Whereas Number 3 excludes many different members of the jury‚ focusing the majority of his efforts on convincing the people he views as threats. Part Two The Foreman established the first rule‚ which was that
Premium Jury