a forensic laboratory for confirmatory chemical analysis before the case can be adjudicated in court; (4) the advent of DNA profiling. 2. Describe the criteria for admissibility of scientific evidence as laid out in Frye v. United States. The court ruled that in order to be admitted as evidence at trail‚ the questioned procedure technique‚ or principles must be “generally accepted” by a meaningful segment of relevant scientific community. This approach requires the proponent of scientific
Premium Evidence law United States Scientific method
Introduction: Statement of problem: AppolloIspat Complex Limited incorporated the incorrect financial statements for the year ended on June 30‚ 2011 with the Prospectus‚ which do not give a true and fair view of the state of the company’s affairs. For this unfair practice AppolloIspat Complex Limited and ICB Capital Management Limited have been punished. Objectives of study: This report is based on study purpose and the objective of the report is to gather knowledge about
Premium
direct and circumstantial evidence. One of the evidence markers weighs significantly heavier than the other‚ direct evidence being much more substantial than any circumstantial evidence. However‚ circumstantial evidence may build an entire case. Direct evidence is defined by Criminal Investigation Basic Perspectives‚ Eleventh Edition as an eye witness who through one of the five senses witnesses the crime committed. To further breakdown this definition of direct evidence‚ one may turn to Merriam-Websters
Premium Forensic evidence Crime Police
durhamInternational Auditing and Assurance Standards Board Exposure Draft December 2007 Comments are requested by April 30‚ 2008 Proposed International Standard on Auditing ISA 265‚ Communicating Deficiencies in Internal Control and Related Conforming Amendments to Other ISAs REQUEST FOR COMMENTS The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB)‚ an independent standardsetting body within the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC)‚ approved the exposure draft
Premium Auditing Audit Internal control
PAKISTAN WINNING 20-20 WORLD CUP: A Nation battling Terrorist Attacks on a daily basis‚ An Attack on a visiting cricket team a few months ago threatened to isolate its national team and the country as a whole from the rest of the cricketing world with all the countries canceling their tours citing security reasons. To Make Matters Worse‚ The ICC cancelled all the matches which were allotted to Pakistan as a Host Nation for the 2011 Cricket World Cup & also shifted the Champions Trophy
Premium Cricket Pakistan national cricket team
Please explain the Frye Standard. 1. The Frye Standard is a standard used to determine the admissibility of an expert’s scientific testimony. A court in which applies the Frye Standard must determine whether or not the method which the evidence was obtained was generally accepted by experts in the field in which it belongs. When did this standard come into effect and why? 2. The Frye Standard came out of a 1923 legal decision (Frye V United States). It was a case discussing the
Premium Evidence law Daubert standard Jury
key intangible assets that make a significant difference when it comes to market value. Organizational capabilities are stable over time and more difficult to copy than other competitive advantages like product strategy or technology. A capabilities audit can show a company how measure up and how to build on intangible strengths to implement cultural interchange and communal harmony among employees. Some capabilities that well-managed companies all tend to have are as follows Talent: Talent is the
Premium Organizational studies Wells Fargo Edgar Schein
execution of the strategy at various stages First you have to decide how you are going to tackle the audit. That’s the big picture. It could be that you decide there are no good internal controls. Your strategy would then be to not do any TOCs and concentrate on substantive procedures. Having decided that then you have to plan how you will use substantive procedures to get sufficient appropriate audit evidence. If your strategy is not to do any tests of control‚ then the detailed plan will take that into
Premium Auditing Risk Internal control
particular question‚ no credit will be given for that question. 1. Which of the following is not a Sarbanes-Oxley requirement for audit committees? A. The audit committee should view itself as the “client” of the external auditor. B. The audit committee must be chaired by the chair of the board of directors. C. Audit committee members must be financially literate. D. Audit committee members must be outside directors. 2. There are several reasons why users of information desire assurance services
Premium Auditing Audit Internal control
What is the difference between direct and circumstantial evidence? Give two practical examples of each. Direct evidence proves a fact without interference and does not require any reasoning to arrive at the conclusion to be drawn from the evidence. Basically it can prove a fact by itself. Everything a witness saw‚ heard‚ found‚ etc. are examples of direct evidence. -A customer was present when they robbed the supermarket‚ he witnessed the event. -A person saw through the window when the criminal
Premium Crime Criminal law Murder