“A Defense of Religious Exclusivism” Alvin Plantinga Religious exclusivism is an idea that is the complete opposite of religious pluralism. Religious pluralist’s such as John Hick have ideas containing a set of beliefs asserting that multiple religions can not only all co-exist‚ but they can all also be true within their own beliefs that they hold about the cosmology of the Earth‚ God‚ and our existence. And the complete opposite of John Hick’s belief is the idea of Religious Exclusivism.
Premium Religion Philosophy of religion God
In the context of Thomson’s article‚ A Defense of Abortion‚ the violinist is a famous violinist that was found unconscious and has a fatal kidney alignment. The benefactor is yourself‚ who was determined to have the same blood type as the violinist. With having the same blood type‚ the benefactor was kidnapped and their kidneys were used to extract poisons from the violinists’ blood as well as your own. If the violinist is unplugged from you‚ he will die; but after 9 months he will have recovered
Premium Core issues in ethics Abortion Pregnancy
Sarah Plantiff and Appellant V. ACME‚ KM‚ and STE Facts: The City of Albany decided to upgrade a fleet of repair trucks in order to respond to pothole fixing. ACME manufactured a cab and chassis of a truck that was then sold to Keefer Motors. Keefer Motors sold the truck unchanged to the City of Albany. No discussion by ACME or Keefer Motors had taken place with the City as to what the city would do with the truck. Susan’s Truck Equipment was contracted by the city to add a dump bed and
Premium Implied warranty Contract law
impersonal‚ mechanical causal laws. To clarify hard determinism further‚ let me present hard determinism as an argument. Basically hard determinism argues that: (a) Determinism is true (b) Determinism is incompatible with free will (Holbach‚ 451). In defense of premise (a)‚ the hard determinist says that obviously everything is caused‚ therefore determinism is true. To prove that determinism is false‚ the opponent would have to come up with an example of an uncaused event. To defend premise (b)‚ the hard
Premium Causality Determinism Free will
An argument I found problematic is that of Walzer’s in his work titled “In Defense of Equality.” He believes that redistribution undermines achievement and ability and distribution should be based on intrinsic value. As stated‚ “The difficulty here is that making money is only rarely a form of self-expression‚ and the money we make is rarely enjoyed for its intrinsic qualities. In a capitalist world‚ money is the universal medium of exchange” (Walzer 400). Furthermore‚ talent is distributed unevenly
Premium Capitalism Economics Marxism
is improving‚ using technology is irresistible to students’ later lives due to our society and technology combing together. The innovative technology is merely a neutral tool that we‚ students‚ can choose to use anyway we wish. In the article In Defense of Laptops in the Classroom‚ Rebecca Schuman states that banning laptops would not teach 13th-graders‚ college students‚
Premium Technology
that ensures their self-preservation. Rousseau argues that the individual in the minority may be forced to legitimately follow the majority decision and still retain his or her autonomy. Wolff is able to discredit this line of thought in his work In Defense of Anarchism by proving different parts of the theory invalid. However‚ anarchists desire to discredit authority‚ like democratic governments‚ for their philosophy of anarchy‚ but people need an authority over them that can ensure their well-being
Premium Political philosophy Liberalism Sociology
I feel that self- defense killing is not wrong. For an example‚ if I’m home alone with my kids and someone breaks into my house to try to hurt me or my kids‚ as a mother my job is to protect my kids or die trying. No‚ I wouldn’t want to kill anybody because even though he/she is not innocent it’s still a human life that has to be taken. But I have to protect myself and my kids by any means‚ even if I have to kill someone. So no I do not think that killing someone in self-defense is wrong because the
Premium
A Defense of Ethical Relativism-Ruth Benedict Summary Paper Ethical relativism is the theory that holds that morality is relative to the norms of one’s culture. That is‚ whether an action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced. The same action may be morally right in one society but be morally wrong in another. Benedict mentions emotions such as joy‚ anger‚ and grief‚ or human drives such as the sex drive‚ and argues that these emotions can be expressed
Premium Morality Cultural relativism
In Defense of Food was quite shocking at first. In all honesty‚ it made me think I was going to die within the next week due to a heart attack triggered by all the junk I eat. Considering I myself indulge in processed cookies from the aisles of Stop and Shop‚ and steak tips that have been marinating in salt for two days‚ the film hit close to home. But in all honesty‚ I don’t eat that bad; in comparison to the Seventh-Day Adventists I do‚ but I think I’m doing alright. Pollan explains that the Western
Premium Nutrition Obesity Food