Title of Case: Florida v. Michael A. Riley Legal Citation: 488 U.S. 445‚ 109 S.Ct. 693‚ 102 L.Ed.2d. 835 (1989) Procedural History: The respondent‚ Michael A. Riley‚ was charged with possession of marijuana under Florida law. The trail court granted his motion to suppress; the Court of Appeals reversed but certified the case to the Florida Supreme Court‚ which rejected the decision of the Court of Appeals and reinstated the trail court’s suppression order. The Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Farwell‚ Benjamin CJU 134 Chp.8‚ Pg 286 Miranda V Arizona FACTS: On March 16‚ 1963‚ Ernesto Miranda was arrested for kidnapping and rape. Mr. Miranda was an immigrant‚ and although the officers did not notify Mr. Miranda of his rights‚ he signed a confession after two hours of investigation. The signed statement included a statement that Mr. Miranda was aware of his rights‚ although the officers admitted at trial that Mr.Miranda was not appraised of his right to have an attorney present
Premium Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Miranda v. Arizona Law
fairness to the great satisfaction of our stake holders‚ shareholders and business partners. Description Vision PFSB & Company‚ CPA is the epitome of excellence in audit and assurance‚ tax services‚ consultancy and accounting and related services. BRIEF HISTORY Formed A.D.Pascual & associates‚ CPAs‚ the principal himself‚ Alexander D. Pascual‚ a Certified Public Accountant‚ duly registered with Professional Regulation Commission and order of PRC Certificate No. 59638 issued on June 15‚ 1984‚ took
Premium Certified Public Accountant Accountant
Jessica Feeney Paralegal 246 Monday / Wednesday 7 – 10:10pm People v. Green 163 Cal.App.3d 239‚ 205 CalRptr.255 (Cal App 2 Dist. 1984) Facts: The defendant Vencil Green was charged and convicted of 12 felony offenses. The defendant used a gun to commit robbery and kidnaping for the purpose of robbery. At trial court the defendant presented expert testimony that the defendant’s history of heavy usage of PCP and other illicit drugs that has affected his brain and his ability to have committed
Premium Appeal Crime Court
Citation Eisner v. Macomber‚3 AFTR 3020‚ 252 US 189‚1 USTC ¶32 (US‚ 1920) Issue (1) Under the 16th Amendment‚ does Congress have the power to tax stock dividends received by the Macomber? (2) Are stock dividends considered income? Facts Mrs. Macomber owned 2‚200 shares of Standard Oil Company. In January 1916‚ Standard Oil Company declared a 50% stock dividend. Mrs. Macomber received an additional 1‚100 shares of stock with a $19‚877 par value. The shares represented a surplus for Standard
Premium Stock market Stock Supreme Court of the United States
ruled that Tuskegee city officials redrew the cities boundaries unconstitutionally so that the white candidates in the cities political race could win and the blacks’ votes would not count. This case laid the framework for the passage of the 1965 voters rights act which outlawed discrimination in voting. The case was named after a Tuskegee university professor Charlie A. Gomillion who was the plaintiff and the defendant was the mayor of Tuskegee Phillip M. Lightfoot. Gomillion tried to make it easier
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States American Civil War
experience and knowledge of Gun Ledbetter Frame. As a real estate professional in the Houston Bay area‚ Gun Ledbetter Frame has helped many homeowners sell their homes. Gun Ledbetter Frame’s expertise and understanding of the regional market allows area sellers to sell their homes quickly and for the best possible price. Homeowners who are looking to put their Houston Bay area home on the market in the coming year‚ can trust that as a local market expert Gun Ledbetter Frame can help. Understanding
Premium Marketing Strategic management Customer service
Mapp v. Ohio‚ 367 U.S. 1081‚ 81 S. Ct. 1684‚ 6 L. Ed. 2d 1081 (1961) Facts: On May 23rd‚ 1957‚ three Cleveland police officers arrived at the home of Mrs. Mapp with information that ‘a person was hiding out in the home‚ who was wanted for questioning in connection with a recent bombing‚ and that there was a large amount of policy paraphernalia being hidden in the home’. Mrs. Mapp and her daughter lived on the top floor of the two-family dwelling. Upon their arrival at that house‚ the officers
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution Exclusionary rule
GOODYEAR – SUMITOMO DEAL Introduction Goodyear was the leading tire manufacturer till the late 1980s after which Groupe Michelin and Bridgestone Corp toppled Goodyear from its number one market position. Samir Gibara of Goodyear wanted to regain the top spot by increasing the annual revenues by at least 50% and that would be possible only through the acquisition of another company. Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd of Japan seemed to be a good strategic acquisition for Goodyear because of its Dunlop
Premium Tire
Sorption Evaluation of Waste Tire Rubber for Spill Oil Recovery and to optimize the Sorption with respect to Particle Size and Temperature. Project Advisor Miss Nida Qamar Group Members Ahmad Shakeel (Group Leader) (2009-PE-34) Mohsin Ali Khan (2009-PE-52) Asif Ali (2009-PE-56) Ali Sher (2008-PPE-46) Department of Polymer
Premium Petroleum