biology lessons‚ medical training‚ curiosity driven experimentation‚ chemical‚ drug‚ food and cosmetic testing.” -peta.org. The Rifkin article discusses about the pain animals feel. According to Rifkin Animals feel the pain as if they were a human bean. Innocent animals are being killed each day just for the fun of it or for some kind product testing. He believes we ought to change the way we treat animals. The way we treat the animals has to be changed. In the first place the way we treat animals
Premium Animal testing Animal rights Testing cosmetics on animals
Angeles Times‚ Jeremy Rifkin claims animals have the same understanding and concept of emotions we humans have‚ and that we should treat them as our equals. This idea of his is absurd‚ and if you really look at it you can see‚ he is just another animal rights activist trying to get his voice heard. Rifkin has claimed that animals feel the same emotions we do‚ either good or bad. He said “they feel pain‚ suffer‚ and experience stress‚ affection‚ excitement‚ and even love….” (Rifkin pg.33Parag.2)
Premium Psychology Mammal Emotion
run-down cages on fur farms? Animals should have a Bill of Rights because they have emotions‚ feel pain‚ and are being forced into painful experiments. Animals should be able to play with each other because they have emotions. In Jeremy Rifkin’s article‚ “A Change of Heart about Animals”‚ he states that “studies on pigs show that they crave attention and are easily depressed if isolated”. This fact shows us that people don’t really care what animals go through. Some may argue that it
Premium Animal rights Human rights Mammal
Letter to the Editor Jeremy Rifkin ’s article‚ “A Change of Heart About Animals” argues that animals are more like humans than we imagine and as a result should be treated with the care that they deserve. Rifkin develops and supports his argument using facts about the animals and these facts end up touching hearts. In order for Rifkin to get his point across he uses a smart technique by using pathos and plays with the emotions of his audience. Rifkin loves animals and his passion and love evokes
Premium Mammal Psychology Human
which are more important. “A Change of heart About Animals”‚ by Jeremy Rifkin‚ is an article where he argues how animals have feelings and should have their own rights. He describes how animals have the ability to learn. What he doesn’t do is describe animals as a lower class‚ but as “Our fellow creatures” so he states in his article. In Rifkin’s article he uses language such as ethos‚ pathos‚ and logos while using a persuasive tone. Ethos is expressed when Rifkin credits the scientists at Oxford
Premium Hamburger Rhetoric Logos
Editor‚ Jeremy Rifkin exposes in his writing of “A Change of Heart About Animals” that our hearts should be transformed into a bound of compassion for animals and that we should see them with new eyes that envision equality. Although he carries great insights toward his stand‚ many of it is weak and could be easily broken through an argument. Rifkin up raises his view that all animals deserve love and should be comforted‚ but this view alone creates a great discomfort to the hearts of many
Premium Love
their babies how to walk and talk. Birds have to break down their babies’ food‚ just like our mothers have to start feeding us little by little. Rifkin in his article “A Change of Heart about Animals” offers some compelling evidence that humans and animals share lots of things‚ but not all of his example are convincing. Just how humans use tools wisely Rifkin shows and explains how animals use tools‚ one of that is how birds can create their own tools and put them to use. Birds are very smart and very
Premium Bird Sign language Tool
Rifkin is able to make his audience believe that we should do more for animals by using very negative language when talking about how we currently treat animals. At the end of his article there is a paragraph where Rifkin asks a lot of questions. Almost all of his questions have negative words. For example‚ he talks about "animals subjected each year to painful laboratory experiments" and "raised under the most inhumane conditions." He also says that animals are "for slaughter and human consumption
Free Human Thought Problem solving
English 121 March 17‚ 2011 In your Journal: “A reply to Rifkin” The embryonic cloning debate touches down ethical issues that are each debatable. One is the debate whether it is healthy and or ethical to obtain eggs from a woman for stem cells. It calls for hormone treatment and surgery. With all surgeries‚ there is always a risk‚ but with this one it’s an ethical debate if it is right or not. Another reason why is that people are afraid that we will fall down a slippery slope into human cloning
Premium Human Cloning Cell
TRunning Head: The Heart of Change Integrative Paper The Heart of Change Integrative Paper Cordell Reynolds Webster University Abstract Organizational change is not easy‚ but is an integral component that often allows the company and its employees to be prosperous. There are many ways to approach organizational change. Some are scientific theories like those stated in Organizational Behavior and Management (John Ivancevich) while others like John P. Kotter
Premium Management Change management Organization