A Defense of A Defense of Abortion In her article‚ A Defense of Abortion‚ Judith Jarvis Thomson argues that in some though not all cases‚ women have a right to abortion due to property rights in regards to their body‚ and the undue burden against these rights that would be placed on women if they are to be made responsible for any and all pregnancies. Thomson uses a variety of sometimes strange analogies to make her point that even if we give in to the argument that a fetus is a person‚ and thus
Free Pregnancy Abortion Property
Abortion is viewed as morally impermissible. The premise is made that the fetus’s right to life outweighs the mother’s right as to what happens in and to her body. Thomson argues that abortion is morally permissible in certain cases such as rape and if the mother’s life is at risk. Thomson’s argument is valid‚ thus making the original argument that abortion is morally impermissible‚ false in certain cases‚ and also rejecting the original premise that was made. Thomoson uses the premise that
Premium Abortion Abortion debate Murder
"Marquis versus Thomson on Abortion" The debate about abortion focuses on two issues; 1.) Whether the human fetus has the right to life‚ and‚ if so‚ 2.) Whether the rights of the mother override the rights of the fetus. The two ethicists who present strong arguments for their position‚ and who I am further going to discuss are that of Don Marquis and Judith Thomson. Marquis’ "Future Like Ours" (FLO) theory represents his main argument‚ whereas‚ Thomson uses analogies to influence the reader of her
Premium Abortion Argument Abortion debate
Thomson vs. Marquis Blake Place Philosophy 160 Monday Wednesday 10:40AM – 12:05PM In submitting this assignment with this cover page‚ I am hereby stating that: (1) I have voluntarily read‚ understand‚ and agree to uphold and abide by the syllabus plagiarism policy for this class; (2) I have neither plagiarized any other author’s written material or unwritten ideas or enabled (intentionally or unwittingly) other students to plagiarize any part of this assignment; (3) I have neither shown or
Premium United States Psychology Education
In the context of Thomson’s article‚ A Defense of Abortion‚ the violinist is a famous violinist that was found unconscious and has a fatal kidney alignment. The benefactor is yourself‚ who was determined to have the same blood type as the violinist. With having the same blood type‚ the benefactor was kidnapped and their kidneys were used to extract poisons from the violinists’ blood as well as your own. If the violinist is unplugged from you‚ he will die; but after 9 months he will have recovered
Premium Core issues in ethics Abortion Pregnancy
Abortion should be morally permissible‚ in most cases‚ because a women’s right to her own body neutralizes the unfortunate circumstance of an aborted fetus. Abortion should only be impermissible if it is justified that a woman is getting multiple pregnancies and abortions without making use or effort of contraceptives. A common argument against abortion is that a fetus is a human being from the moment of conception. This premise is a slippery slope because it claims that life of a person is continuous
Premium Pregnancy Abortion Fetus
problem with abortion has been about figuring out the rights that a fetus has and if the fetus is considered a person. Usually the most common argument against abortion is that the fetus is a human being and it is wrong to kill a human being. However‚ there are a few things to consider that allows abortion to be permissible. Before we get into the argument it is important to establish when a fetus is considered a person. These are the issues that Judith Jarvis Thomson’s “A Defense to Abortion” discusses
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Fetus
udith Jarvis Thomson wrote a paper titled A Defense of Abortion which supports my view that abortion is permissible. An argument when it comes to people’s views on abortion is whether or not they believe the fetus is a person. If we could just come to a conclusion on this it would be simple right‚ if fetuses are people then abortions are impermissible‚ and if fetuses are not people then abortions are permissible. This is not the case though and many people who do defend abortion say that the fetus
Premium
The statement "defense of abortion"‚ gives us an another view to a problem of abortion. Mostly‚ Judith Jarvis Thompson protects pro-choice side‚ and she says that abortion is not immoral‚ and that it is logically correct action. However there are a lot of anti-abortion philosophers who are not agree with it. So Judith Thompson gives an arguments to proof her sides correctness. She says that mother has all rights to do anything with her body and things in her body. Judith Jarvis Thompson also believes
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Abortion debate
The title is somewhat misleading because it’s not a complete defense of Abortion it’s more of a minimal defense. In Thomson’s essay‚ she states that Abortion is not necessarily morally impermissible which means that there are times when it is permissible and there are times when it is not. She begins the essay by pointing out that people debate on whether or not a fetus is a person. Many people feel that If we had an answer to that then that would make things a whole lot simpler and we would know
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Fetus