Should Governments Sponsor Gambling? The government is now sponsoring gambling to raise revenues. By 2002 government-sponsored gambling brought in 11 billion dollars! "Winning means a life of luxury and happiness‚" is only one of the many slogans the government uses to advertise gambling. Gambling has a lot of pros as to the economy and employing more citizens but it has a lot of cons as well. Should governments sponsor gambling? The answer is no! Governments should not sponsor gambling because
Premium Problem gambling Addiction Gambling
Should government censor the internet? Let’s‚ for a moment‚ try to imagine a completely benevolent government‚ who wants to censor it’s citizens internet access. Maybe things like how to make a bomb‚ or a website where you can buy illegal goods. Everyone will be happy with such a government‚ whose only intentions are to shelter the people it governs from content that it is dangerous‚ harmful or inappropriate‚ and not to spread propaganda by controlling information. However unlikely it is for such
Premium Internet Internet censorship Censorship
Iacocca knew that he needed help‚ and the only place to go was to the U.S. Government. While it seemed a long-shot‚ Iacocca explained to Congress that “if Chrysler collapsed it would cost the country 2.75 billion dollars alone in unemployment benefits” (Cole‚ 2004‚ Method section‚ para 20). In addition‚ Iacocca decreased management salaries considerably (including his own for $1 year) and went to work. With the government subsidy‚ Chrysler initiated a new‚ aggressive campaign and “…paid back the
Premium Unemployment Chrysler
The U.S. Government has a very large amount of debt‚ but yet the government is still focus on building and supporting things that are not necessary for the economy at all. What the U.S. Government needs to do is find a way to manage our debt‚ it is okay to have stadiums but it does no good for our economy. That is the problem with our society they are too busy worrying about sports than politics. They care and worry about who is going to win the super bowl this year‚ than to how is our financing
Premium United States United States public debt President of the United States
they know how the scope of this broadness would shape America_Ñés future. The extent to which the government should interact in the lives of the American people is one of the most highly debated topics of both past and present politics. And‚ as the role of technology in the 21st century becomes more and more prevalent‚ this specific idea becomes increasingly
Premium United States Management High school
According to research‚ every year‚ more than 81 million people are added to the world-wide population and every 10 years‚ almost one billion inhabitants are added to the world’s population. There are many reasons one would say the population should be government-controlled. During the course of this essay I will be highlighting factors such as; the trends of population growth‚ environmental aspects of over-population and the financial attributes towards over-population. Trends of Population Growth
Premium World population Overpopulation Population growth
The government is trying to take away our phone and we are not happy. Some people are going crazy and trying to danger. It is getting way out of hand now. The government should just let us keep our phones and everything would go back to normal. Do you think the people should keep their phones or should the government take them? We have had phones for over forty years.Why would you take them away from us? Most people in this time can only go on with the day without there phones. For example‚
Premium United States Government Privacy
certain groups or individuals have their rights stripped away due to an unpopular opinion‚ then how long will it be until nearly every other group also loses these rights? Leaving America looking more like a foreign land‚ with dissenters silenced and locked away. As Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy has said‚ “The First Amendment is often inconvenient‚ but that is besides the point. Inconvenience does not absolve the government of its obligation to tolerate speech” (Susan300).
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
topic‚ and people have mixed views about this‚ but we should keep in mind that there are positive outcomes to legalizing abortion. The government has been placing certain bans and restrictions on abortion‚ but the government should leave the abortion option because abortion is for the woman to choose not the government‚ it prevents child abuse and neglect‚ and it prevents illegal abortions. For these reasons and those that follow‚ the government should not have the right to illegalize abortion. To begin
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Fetus
useful and educational knowledge which can be found in the cyberspace‚ there are also many other sources of information which are considered harmful‚ corrupting and degenerative‚ especially to a younger audience. In different parts of the world‚ governments react differently to this new invention. While in more democratic countries full access and almost no restrictions are introduced‚ in other communist and dictatorship countries it is completely banned or fully supervised by the national authorities
Premium Government History of the Internet Dictatorship