"A key idea of immanuel kant s ethical theory is that" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 35 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume vs Kant Causality

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Hume vs. Kant: Causality Hume’s ultimate goal in his philosophic endeavors was to undermine abstruse Philosophy. By focusing on the aspect of reason‚ Hume shows there are limitations to philosophy. Since he did not know the limits‚ he proposed to use reason to the best of his ability‚ but when he came to a boundary‚ that was the limit. He conjectured that we must study reason to find out what is beyond the capability of reason. Hume began his first examination if the mind by

    Premium Metaphysics Logic Immanuel Kant

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant vs. Hegel

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Leona Take LARS 3155 10 February 2013 Kant and Hegel Hegel’s concept of the “Absolute Idea” claims that there is a universal and ideal standard that is continuously being revealed throughout history‚ in various forms of human expression. The Absolute Idea can be interpreted as God‚ nature‚ spirit‚ or reality. With art‚ there is no such thing as “Art for Art’s sake” because art is a manifestation of the unfolding of the Absolute Idea. In Hegel’s Art History‚ the progression of art is always

    Premium Ontology Aesthetics Mind

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the dominant motifs of the "Situation" section‚ is the concept of the "new" (see also‚ the modern) and its relationship to the situation of art. This concept and its dialectical...complications/implications is absolutely fundamental to Adorno’s philosophy in general‚ especially in relation to a motif of failed (or aborted) revolutions and their relation to what Adorno occasionally refers to as the aging of modernity. Whither Adorno’s account of the "resistance to the new”? For him‚ any and

    Premium Modern art Art Aesthetics

    • 1046 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant vs. Virtue Ethics

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    with two different ethical theories‚ by Kantian and/or Aristotelian views. The approach that we take with Kant’s views is strictly based on reason. The key factor in this situation with Kant would ask if we did this action without any thought. Because Kant heavily argues that a moral person has to be rational‚ the thought process that you went through to arrive to the action is needed and very important. With this in mind we need to look at the other key concepts of his theory. With every action

    Premium Ethics Thought Virtue

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    on a singular person’s desires or wills. For Kant‚ categorical imperatives are the foundation for morality because they invoke “pure” reasons for our moral actions and decisions since each rational being reasons to act outside of their own personal desires or will which may cloud judgments or impose a biased verdict of the situation. Kant explains this by distinguishing two different kinds of imperatives; categorical and hypothetical. Obviously Kant is interested in categorical imperatives and uses

    Premium Morality Immanuel Kant Categorical imperative

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Differences Between Ethical Theories Ethical theories are based on explained ethical principles. There are three major ethical theories: virtue ethics‚ utilitarianism‚ and deontological ethics. in this paper the similarities and diffrences between virtue theory‚ utilitarianism‚ and deontological ethics. The meaning of virtue theory‚ utilitarianism‚ and deontological ethics would need to be defined in order to be able to distiguish the similarities and diffrences. The virtue theory judges a person

    Premium Ethics Virtue ethics Deontological ethics

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Capital Punishment Debate Immanuel Kant justifies his support for the death penalty by stating in his work Metaphysics of Morals that “if he has committed murder‚ he must die.” (Kant 1996) In Kant’s opinion‚ the death penalty is justified only when regarding murder and no other crime‚ unless it causes substantial damage to society. In Kant’s time‚ the eighteenth century‚ people seemed to believe in an eye for an eye. Do people still have the same mentality about the death penalty in modern

    Premium Capital punishment Crime Prison

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Examine the key ideas of two critiques of religious belief Freud was a neurologist and is known as the founding father of psychoanalysis. Freud believed that religion is used as a protective system that man should ‘disregard in its relation to reality’. Freud saw to origins of religious belief lying with primitive tribes. The tension between the dominant male and the subordinate males (sons) culminates to over throw the father (this is a manifestation of the Oedipus complex). However‚ the guilt that

    Premium Religion God Faith

    • 1054 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corresponding Ethical Theory Being Agnostic I do not fully believe that a God or Gods exists‚ but I’m not in complete denial that it could be a possibility. I believe in science and what it can prove. I am very skeptical in nature and crave substantial evidence of all things. I would like to think that there is some type of divine essence supporting human’s purpose on Earth‚ but no one can know for certain. The origin of our Universe is best explained by the Big Bang Theory. It states

    Premium Big Bang Scientific method Human

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant vs Hinduism

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant and Hinduism (observed in the Bhagavad-Gita) There are many similarities between the analyses of religious works of Hinduism (the Gita being used in this case) and the philosophical work of Kant‚ or even Buddhism and Hume for that matter. Both argue from similar premises about personal identity and share similar conclusions about human action. Their metaphysical models are similar‚ as are their rules of logic‚ and some feelings towards one’s duty. They make their claims from different

    Premium Grammatical person Logic Brahman

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
Page 1 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 50