This paper serves to argue in favor of cultural relativism‚ which claims that the correct moral standards are relative to a certain culture or society. This argument suggests that “an act is morally acceptable just because it is allowed by the guiding ideals of the society in which it is performed‚ and immoral just because it is forbidden by those ideals” (Landau‚ 2001). I will first present cultural relativism and its implications. As we move past the central argument‚ I will present a series of
Premium Morality Culture
Throughout the 16th and 17th centuries of Europe‚ two nations‚ specifically France and England saw great changes in their forms of government and means of authority. After the death of Henry IV‚ France saw a great step towards absolutism with the work of Cardinal Richelieu‚ who was the advisor to King Louis XIII. He decreased the power of the Huguenots by taking away their military and political powers and also increased the taille‚ the annual tax by the Church to the public. England also saw changes
Premium Europe Louis XIV of France Monarchy
Cultural Relativism is a perspective that moral codes vary from culture to culture‚ no moral code within in a culture is superior to the other codes in different cultures; This ideology comes from that there is no universal truth‚ meaning there is no philosophical standard that determines if something is either right or wrong‚ therefore one cannot establish that something is “better.” In “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism‚” James Rachels introduces the topic by introducing Darius whom is a king
Premium Cultural relativism Culture Sociology
Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism The world today consists of an incalculable number of societies. Each society varies significantly in the different elements of culture. Culture is one’s designed way of living based on erudite customs‚ knowledge‚ material items‚ and behavior. Within every society today lives an ethnocentric attitude. The belief that ones own culture is superior to that of another’s. However‚ it is important to develop a sense of cultural relativism in today’s society‚ considering
Premium Culture Cultural relativism Anthropology
Louis XIV stressed the five major factors of absolutism were as follows: the King must be God-like‚ king must be in control‚ King must be the wealthiest‚ that conformity ( the idea of converting mass population from one religion to another) be implemented‚ and the King must have a strong military. These are the 5 rules of absolute monarchy. So it would seem that Louis XIV did believe in absolute monarchy as his reign was exactly that. He alone a was the ruler with absolute control over the entire
Premium
Absolutism‚ “the political practice of unlimited power and absolute sovereignty‚ especially as held by a monarch‚” was a prominent form of government in Europe until the eighteenth century. Monarchs believed that they alone held the “divine right to rule‚” and there were no checks and balances on their authority. Leaders felt as though they were justified in ruling in any way that they wanted‚ even if it caused harm to their people. France and Spain both had absolutist monarchies for significant
Premium
principles about women and to honor their religion they follow them. Cultural relativism is important here. It states that a people’s values and customs must be understood in terms of the culture of which they are a part. If the Iraqi women do not understand why they are to cover their bodies
Premium Gender Female Woman
Cultural relativism is a process involving the examining and understanding of a culture‚ /different from your own‚ without discrediting their beliefs. Understanding differing cultural beliefs can be acquired by considering functions of practices‚ behaviors‚ symbols‚ traditions‚ and morals within a society. The initial concept of cultural relativism was created to turn people away from ethnocentrism‚ which is the belief that your cultures beliefs are authentic and all other cultures beliefs are
Premium Nursing Relativism Culture
For Rachels and Rachels‚ "The Challenge of Cultural Relativism‚" in Abel pp. 397-409. All of your responses should be written in complete sentences. What is the “Cultural Differences” argument? Different cultures have different moral codes. Therefore‚ there is no objective "truth" in morality. Right and wrong are only matters of opinion and opinions vary from culture to culture. Why do Rachels and Rachels think it is a bad argument? The conclusion does not follow from the premise that is‚ even if
Premium Morality Cultural relativism Culture
Who decides where the line is drawn? What standing ground does one have when question the morals of another? Where is the benchmark? This essay shall examine the statement aforementioned‚ firstly by engaging with cultural relativism‚ then critically discuss cultural relativism and lastly examine the implications for educational practices in South Africa. With regards to the statement‚ it is first important to note the definition of morality. “Morality speaks of a system of behavior in regards
Premium