Performance objectives are benchmarks of effective performance that describe the types of work activities students and affiliates will be involved in as trainee accountants. They also outline the values and attitudes trainees should demonstrate as they fulfil their practical experience requirements. Trainees are required to achieve 13 performance objectives in total – all nine Essentials performance objectives and any four Options performance objectives. Performance objectives are divided into nine
Premium Management Management accounting Finance
promoter is a “person who undertakes to form a company with reference to a given object and set it going and takes the necessary steps to accomplish the purpose”. (Company Law in Malaysia‚ pg42) A promoter may be a natural person for example when the sole proprietor promotes a company to take over his business. (Company Law in Malaysia‚ pg42) The promotion process includes negotiations‚ registration of the company‚ obtaining directors and shareholders and preparing the paper work. In this case
Premium Fiduciary Legal entities Common law
Explain the main determinants of the level of business activity in the economy and how variations in the level of business activity affect individuals‚ households and businesses © accountingclassroom.com 2008 Student Notes for ACCA F1-Accountant in Business © accountingclassroom.com 2008 Student Notes for ACCA F1-Accountant in Business Session Objectives Explain the impact of economic issues on the individual‚ the household and the business: i) Inflation ii) Unemployment iii) Stagnation
Premium Inflation Monetary policy Macroeconomics
Riordan Corporate Compliance Plan I. Introduction Riordan Manufacturing Inc. is a global plastics manufacturer with facilities in San Jose‚ CA‚ Albany‚ GA‚ Pontiac‚ MI‚ and Hangzhou‚ China. The projected annual earnings for Riordan are $46 million. To achieve the projected earnings and financial profitability‚ the Riordan Board of Directors (BD) will need to focus on the formation of Riordan’s Corporate Compliance Plan (CCP). The CCP will provide to BD of Riordan the prevention and management
Premium Law World Trade Organization Risk
the rights to provide independent judgement. However‚ at the same time directors must restrict their independence in a good faith to make decision that would benefit the company. Corporate opportunity factually explains that any business opportunity that could advantage a business (Law Cornell‚ 2010). Thus‚ corporate opportunity doctrine leads the legal duty of directors‚ officers and leading shareholders in a company‚ in the responsibility of loyalty‚ not to take any opportunity for their oneself
Premium Fiduciary Board of directors
Chapter 4 – Constituting Companies (Mini summary relevant for Chapter 22 – Transacting by Companies 1) Legal effect of the internal governance rules s140 states that: “a company’s constitution (if any) and any replaceable rules that apply to the company have effect as a contract: a) Between the company and each member b) Between the company and each director and company secretary c) Between a member and each other member Under which each person agrees to observe and perform ... the rules so
Premium Corporation Constitution United States Constitution
The law laid down in Soloman v. Soloman and Co. is often considered the source on the basis of which the jurisprudence of corporate personality has been written world over. However‚ the history of corporate-commercial litigation has witnessed situations where in the Courts have gone beyond the corporate cloak and analyzed the working and the motives of the members or directors of the company: In doing the same‚ the Courts have evolved the concept of lifting or piercing the corporate veil.
Premium Corporation Company
THE LAW OF BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS CHAPTER 4 – Piercing the Corporate Veil Minne B Berkey v Third Avenue Railway Company Overview: This is a New York Court of Appeals decision in 1926 adjudicated by the legendary Justice Cardozo. In this seminal case on ‘piercing the corporate veil’‚ the Court of Appeals finds in favor of the Defendant‚ Third Avenue Railway Company. The Court holds that Third Avenue‚ the parent company of Forty-second Street Company‚ which operated a rail line upon which the
Premium Corporation Subsidiary Appeal
Business Law “The doctrine laid down in Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 has to be watched very carefully. It has often been supposed to cast a veil on the personality of a limited company through which the courts cannot see. But that is not true. The courts can‚ and often do‚ draw aside the veil. They can‚ and often do‚ pull off the mark. They look to see what really lies behind” - Lord Denning in Littlewoods Mail Order Stores v Inland revenue Commissioners [1969] 3 All ER 422.
Premium Corporation Law
Research Paper: The principle of a separate corporate personality is a fundamental concept in Business Law. However this does not stop the courts from lifting or piercing the veil to see what lies beneath. Critically discuss this statement citing the relevant case law. As is evident with most principles of law there are exceptions to the doctrine of separate legal personality. The courts will generally depart from the principle separate corporate personality in certain instances where tools
Premium Corporation Subsidiary Holding company