C E & R E V I S I O N K I T In this January 2010 new edition We discuss the best strategies for revising and taking your ACCA exams We show you how to be well prepared for your exam We give you lots of great guidance on tackling questions We show you how you can build your own exams We provide you with three mock exams including the December 2009 exam We provide the ACCA examiner ’s answers as well as our own to the June and December 2009 exams as an additional revision aid Our i-Pass product
Premium Cost accounting Management accounting Costs
AEREN FOUNDATION’S Maharashtra Govt. Reg. No.: F-11724 [pic] MARKS: 80 COURSES: GDM SUB: CORPORATE LAW N.B.: 1) Attempt any Twelve Questions 2) Last two Questions are compulsory Q.1. In the following statements only one is correct statement. Explain Briefly? (5) i) An invitation to negotiate is a good offer. ii) A quasi-contract is not a contract
Premium Consumer protection Insurance Money
Assignment on University of Dhaka Laws Affecting Business Date: Tuesday‚ 28 May 2013 Submitted to: Prof. Dr. Abu Hossain Siddique Professor‚ Department of International Business University of Dhaka Submitted By: Rabiul Hasan Roll no. 256 6th Batch‚ Department of International Business University of Dhaka Executive Summery Business must operate within the boundaries of laws and government regulations. Laws have been developed not only to protect consumers but also to preserve
Free Common law Law
Fact Sheet Actus Reus The Actus Reus of criminal law includes all elements of a crime except the state of mind of the defendant. Specifically‚ Actus Reus may consist of: conduct‚ result‚ a state of affairs‚ or an omission. Conduct The conduct itself could be criminal. For instance the act of lying under oath represents the Actus Reus of perjury. It does not matter if the lie is believed or if it had any effect on the outcome of the case‚ The Actus Reus of the crime is complete upon conduct.
Premium Criminal law
Question 1 The issue of this question is whether Scott and Kyle can bring legal action against Wayne for what they feel is a breach of contract. Under the law governing offer and acceptance‚ a valid offer has been made through an advertisement. In order for an offer to be accepted‚ the party must entirely accept the offer. The rules governing acceptance has to be positive not passive. Silence does not forms acceptance. The general rule of acceptance is that the acceptance must be received by
Premium Offer and acceptance Contract Option contract
Mia K. Thompson LS311- Business Law I Kaplan University Professor James Starcher November 13‚ 2012 Introduction The purpose of this assignment is to discuss the renovation of Danile and Sondra Estelle home. To finance the cost they obtained a line of credit from Banc One‚ Indiana‚ which periodic does inspections to disburse funds. When the bank did the inspection they found the work to be of poor quality. When Allen failed to act on the Estelle’s complaints‚ they filed a suit in an Indiana
Premium Tort Contract Negligence
Describe an occasion on which you had to demonstrate ethical behavior. During my two years spent in an audit firm I have encountered several situations in which I had to consider several ethical issues. In most of the circumstances it was quite easy to demonstrate ethical behavior and to comply with the firm’s internal regulations. However‚ I have recently encountered a very difficult situation. I was working for a client in the mobile phones industry. The audit team was composed of four
Premium Mobile phone Ethics Business ethics
agreement during their employment. They both left CH20 and went to work for Meras. According to their non-compete agreement from MERAS v. CH2O‚ INC Northern District of California (2013) “after they ceased working for CH20 they would not work for “any business of similar nature to that of [CH20] which is in competition with [CH20]” for the period of three years” When Beriner and Sughroue went to work for Meras they violated their non-compete agreement by not waiting the specified three years before taking
Premium Contract Supreme Court of the United States Court
com/content/k32h077257618274/ 2. Berenbeim‚ R. (1987) ‘Corporate Ethics’‚ The Conference Board (New York)‚ pp. 3. 3. Carroll’ CSR theory[online]. Retrieved from: http://www.cbe.wwu.edu/dunn/rprnts.pyramidofcsr.pdf 4. Carroll‚ A.B (1991) ‘The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders’‚ Business Horizons (July/August) pp.39-48. 5. Carroll‚ A.B. (1979) ‘A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance’‚ Academy of Management Review
Premium Business ethics Corporate governance Corporate social responsibility
Executive Summary Various issues in the common law arise when agents make contracts on behalf of principals. Should a principal be bound when his agent makes a contract on his behalf that he would immediately wish to disavow? The tradeoffs resemble those in tort‚ so the least-cost avoider principle is useful for deciding which agreements are binding and can unify a number of different doctrines in agency law. In particular‚ an efficiency explanation can be found for the undisclosed-principal rule
Premium Contract