" No one owns the internet‚ but people have their personal accounts and information stored in it. I believe that the government - federal‚ state and local levels - should not be able to regulate the internet‚ social media and be able to read our emails. However‚ they are allowed to monitor internet activities in order to be able to recognize and neutralize any potential threats to themselves or the country‚ but so long it does not violate the fourth amendment of no unreasonable searches or violation
Premium Privacy Employment Privacy law
opinionated hearts of all internet users around the world: should the government monitor internet content? This question‚ like many others‚ has sparked debates in many places‚ including the internet itself. The internet‚ today‚ has forced itself into many lives; more than 3.8 billion people or 51% of the population around the world have access to the internet. The world inside the modern internet has become so intricate that many believe the government should have some control to prevent others from losing
Premium Internet Social network service History of the Internet
they should stop animated and computer generated robots from controlling or feeding Americans false information. We have the right the to free speech but we should not let the internet impend on the intelligence and success of our country. The federal government should be allowed to monitor the internet for these bots and be able to remove them from the internet once found. Since false news is seen extensively over the media sites like twitter or can be viewed on google the government should try to
Premium Facebook Social network service Twitter
WHY THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD NOT SPY ON US All the countries establish in its political constitution and in its legislation‚ the duty of the government to look over the life of its citizens‚ protecting them from the risk: the internal threats (inside the proper country) and external (outside the country) That is why‚ it is admitted‚ and it is even required‚ that the government possess a structure of intelligence that resists the action of dangerous forces‚ however lately‚ it has been found that in
Premium Terrorism Government
Religion Should Be Part of Government Decisions. Religion has been a topic of discussion for a while. On whether it should be in schools‚ or on public property‚ or‚ for our cause‚ whether it should be part of the government. To be more clear‚ we’re for the use of religious views (to an extent) in governmental decision and/or regulation. Now‚ one might think that introducing religion in politics is a bad idea‚ but without really researching on the subject‚ one could easily think anything. Just
Premium Meaning of life Life Federal government of the United States
of whether government of any size should play a role in monitoring internet content is very complex. Does the welfare of society warrant a breach of individual privacy? Should the government be in charge of monitoring internet content to ensure citizens are protected? These are not simple questions‚ and not answerable with a simple yes or no. Ronald Reagan stated‚ ‚ÄúGovernment’s first duty is to protect the people‚ not run their lives.‚Äù When it comes to the role government should play in monitoring
Premium United States Constitution First Amendment to the United States Constitution Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Singh1 To: Professor Pisano From: Navdip Singh Date: May 05‚ 2015 The Role of Individuals and Governments to understand the hazard of climate change Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Climate change‚ as defined by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on climate change (IPCC) “any change in climate over time‚ whether due to natural variability or as a result of human activity.” The global climate is extremely complex and has not yet to be fully
Premium Greenhouse gas Climate change Fossil fuel
censoring profanity in a television show or as complex and oppressive as North Korea’s government censoring the entire outside world from North Korea‚ leaving the entire population of North Korea isolated and secluded. This means censorship can be a very hard thing to argue for or against because it can be justifiable‚ but at the same time it is not. So‚ is government censorship justifiable or is it not? Government censorship is justifiable in some circumstances‚ but there is thin line between what
Premium Censorship Internet Pornography
brother of King George Vl‚ upon the death of King George V‚ their father‚ assumed the throne. But David was involved with his mistress‚ Ms. Wallace Simpson‚ who was from the United States. The night that King George V passed away‚ David hugged his mother and ran out of the room crying. David was not crying because he was upset that his father just passed away. He was crying because he was forced to the new king‚ even though he did not want to be king. David did not want to become the new king of England
Premium Family Hamlet Gertrude
and businesses. Since the internet has become so important in today’s society‚ people have been debating whether or not it should be monitored. No one likes being watched‚ but what if that monitoring prevented a murder or a terrorist attack? I believe that the state and federal government should be able to monitor the internet because it is a public place where people should have nothing to hide‚ the constitution has no provisions protecting internet privacy‚ and because monitoring the web can prevent
Premium Surveillance Privacy Government