"Act utilitarianism vs rule utilitarianism vs divine command theory" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 5 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    motivated to act morally because in doing so they obtain what they really want‚ happiness. Mill is more focus with the duties and the legislation that perpetuate them than with our character. The movement away from revelation‚ tradition‚ and authority culminates in the autonomous moral theories of the late modern period. The rejection of belief in God led ultimately to new views of human nature The Postmodern World‚ at the start of 20th century‚ moral philosophy was in crisis. Utilitarianism and Kantianism

    Premium Ethics Utilitarianism Morality

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The idea of utilitarianism classifies actions of being "morally" right or wrong solely based on the results and outcomes of the actions. This paper will analyze the problem that Arthur‚ "the art dealer"‚ faces with artwork pieces he stumbles upon. Arthur’s predicament is that he is given an opportunity to buy looted artworks. His dilemma is to either purchase or to not purchase the art work. This paper will evaluate the two analysis views of a utilitarian: act (extreme) and rule (restricted). First

    Premium Ethics Morality Utilitarianism

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Utilitarianism and libertinism are debatable philosophies to decide what is just. Utilitarian main principle is maximizing society happiness. From Utilitarian point of view‚ the best action is the action produce happiness for the greatest amount of people. Even though minority of people will suffer for the majority’s happiness. Moreover‚ utilitarianism measures the cost and benefit in single scale which is happiness. From this view‚ any other things than happiness are not valuable. On the other hand

    Premium Ethics Utilitarianism Morality

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout our class we have discussed many theories and strategies to help understand why moral conflicts get solved different ways. These theories‚ particularly ethical egoism and act/rule utilitarianism‚ can be used to explore different ways in deciding the morality of whether or not Sarah would steal. Ethical egoism is defined as “the theory that the right action is the one that advances one’s own best interests.” (Vaughn‚ 78) According to this theory‚ it would be morally right for Sarah to steal

    Premium Ethics Morality Utilitarianism

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    non-consequentialist theory introduced by a German Philosopher‚ Immanuel Kant. Kantianism refer to the rightness or wrongness of actions does not depend on their consequences but on whether they fulfill our duty. In this theory‚ Kant stressed on the role of moral sentiment and desire for moral commitment and motivation. Kant argued that morality and rationality coincided. To be moral is to be rational‚ to be immoral is to be irrational. Kant believed that there were some rules of morality that all

    Premium Immanuel Kant Philosophy Categorical imperative

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Act Utilitarianism

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages

    morally justifiable/permissible only with situations‚ in which you can guarantee the best possible outcome. In this particular situation with the bomber‚ I believe we should take the Utilitarian-Act Consequentialism approach; and torture the bomber as an attempt to get him to reveal the location. Simply because‚ Act Consequentialism will focus more on the overall happiness that it will bring to all those involved. Seeing as how they have apprehended the bomber‚ and interrogated him to no avail. It is the

    Premium Utilitarianism Morality Consequentialism

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many ethical theories used to decide which actions are morally right or wrong. Philosophers create theories in which they describe imperatives or rules to help people decide how to conduct themselves to be their moral best. Some are very basic‚ while some are more complex. Philosophers may agree with the entire theory or may pick them apart and only follow pieces as they see fit. Two of these theories are the Natural Law Theory and Utilitarianism‚ which vary in how much they regulate behavior

    Premium Ethics Morality Philosophy

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    categories of ethics in terms of the thought behind the decision are deontology and utilitarianism. Utilitarianism relies on the basis that we judge morality based on the consequences or results of these choices (Bowen‚ 2009‚ p. 4). Moral and ethical choices have good consequences and create happiness‚ whereas unethical or bad choices cause pain or suffering and cannot be justified or normalized. People who follow the utilitarianism approach want the greatest good for the greatest number of people. These methods

    Premium Ethics Morality Philosophy

    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    theory of utilitarianism

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Philosophy of Utilitarianism may have a positive outcome‚ but it can be flawed at times as well. The Utilitarian theory states “ The greatest happiness for the greatest number of people”. Some say this approach is flawed due to it lacking reason and consequence‚ I believe this depends on specific circumstances. Abortion is a big issue now a days and I feel that the utilitarian theory would be a reasonable outlook on this particular situation. To apply the Utilitarian theory to abortion‚ first

    Premium Pregnancy Utilitarianism Abortion

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Theories Of Utilitarianism

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages

    about a moral theory that goes by the name utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is the view that actions are morally acceptable if and only if they produce at least as much happiness as any other available action. The more happiness and less suffering that results from our actions‚ the better the action is and the right action is the one that produces the greatest balance of happiness over suffering. Utilitarianism can be broken up into two parts‚ a theory of what is valuable and a theory of right action

    Premium Utilitarianism Ethics Hedonism

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50