Name gobind shergill Group 2A Id no C3084433 ACFI2005: Capital Adequacy Project Introduction: There is a close relation between the capital adequacy and the financial system but it is important to have an overview before get to the more detailed study of what is going on in the financial system. There is a constant flow of cash and funds through the financial system due to the financial institutions as they assist money movement among the borrowers and lenders (lecture notes‚ chapter 8
Premium Banking Bank Operational risk
63 Equity and Adequacy in School Funding John G. Augenblick John L. Myers Amy Berk Anderson Abstract Since 1971‚ most states have been subject to lawsuits seeking to reform their education funding systems. These cases are litigated on the basis of state (not federal) constitutional language and generally seek either greater equity in funding among school districts or a guaranteed level of adequate funding for education. State supreme courts have found the finance systems unconstitutional in
Premium High school State School
Introduction to Capital Adequacy Norms Along with profitability and safety‚ banks also give importance to Solvency. Solvency refers to the situation where assets are equal to or more than liabilities. A bank should select its assets in such a way that the shareholders and depositors’ interest are protected. Image Credits © light_breeze2010. 1. Prudential Norms The norms which are to be followed while investing funds are called "Prudential Norms." They are formulated to protect the
Premium Bank Central bank
Introduction Consideration is one of the essential elements for a formation of a contract.1 According to Lord Pollock’s definition of consideration which is an act or forbearance of one party‚ or the promise thereof‚ is the price for which the promise of the other is bought and the promise thus given for value is enforceable.2 Besides that‚ consideration must be something of value given or promised in exchange for the promise given by the other party in order for a valid contract to be formed.3
Premium Contract Consideration
Consideration Student Name Instructor Name University Affiliation Date Abstract Consideration is the price that the promisor asks in exchange for their promise‚ that is‚ the price of a given promise. Consideration is not a significant part of a contract in a number of jurisdictions. Once parties have reached a binding agreement‚ that becomes sufficient. Nevertheless‚ the common law requires that for agreement to be binding‚ the person to whom a promise is made (promisee) must offer
Premium Contract Common law
Are the laws regarding rape effective in our society? In the society we call home‚ a person’s rights may be jeopardized in everyday living. Whether it is getting property stolen‚ being physically harmed‚ or even raped‚ a victim of such crimes may suffer long-term psychological or physical pain. Such crimes require legal action be taken against the perpetrator‚ including laws and regulations to prevent and protect all citizens. Offenses regarding rape and sexual assault impact not only the victim
Premium Rape
Consideration In contract law consideration is concerned with the bargain of the contract. A contract is based on an exchange of promises. Each party to a contract must be both a promisor and a promisee. They must each receive a benefit and each suffer a detriment. This benefit or detriment is referred to as consideration. Consideration must be something of value in the eyes of the law - (Thomas v Thomas). This excludes promises of love and affection‚ gaming and betting etc. A one sided promise
Premium Consideration Common law Law
LAW OF CONTRACT Subject Code : 101 TOPIC : VALUE OF INSUFFICIENCY OF CONSIDERATION IN CONTRACT PRESENTED BY : NAME : Siddharth Dalabehera ROLL : 1283092 COURSE : BA LLB (B) UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF : MS. Jinia Kundu and MR. P. K. Ghosh ACKNOWLEDGMENT I owe a great many thanks to a great many people who helped and supported me during
Premium Contract
1 (a) According to the information from the question‚ Hei Lau’s letter amounted to an offer to sell his second-hand car and the offer would remain open for one week. Although Chiu Chor made the first letter to Hei Lau for inquiring “whether he would take HK$40‚000 for the car”‚ the original offer was still valid because this inquiry was a mere request for information about the offer rather than a counter offer‚ it does not imply a rejection of the offer. An example of a mere request is the case
Premium Contract Contract law
WP/12/25 Bank Capital Adequacy in Australia Byung Kyoon Jang and Niamh Sheridan © International Monetary Fund IMF Working Paper Asia and Pacific Department Bank Capital Adequacy in Australia Prepared by Byung Kyoon Jang and Niamh Sheridan1 Authorized for distribution by Ray Brooks January 2012 Abstract This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the IMF. The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those
Premium