Supply Chain Management - Nike & Adidas 1. INTRODUCTION Supply management is a complex function that’s critical to business success‚ responsible for delivering efficient costs‚ high quality‚ fast delivery and continuous innovation throughout companies’ entire supply chains. The strategic contribution of supply management is measured not only in savings made‚ but also in increased shareholder value (Niezen‚ Weller & Deringer‚ 2007). Nike and Adidas are two global companies try to improve their
Premium Adidas Supply chain management Management
shareholder value (Niezen‚ Weller & Deringer‚ 2007). Nike and Adidas are two global companies try to improve their competitive advantage through strategically managing and utilizing their supply chain. The purpose of this report is to compare and evaluate the supply chain management practices of Nike & Adidas. 2. CORPORATE PROFILE 2.1 Nike Corporate Profile Based in Beaverton‚ Oregon‚ and employing approximately 29‚000 people worldwide‚ Nike Inc. is the world’s leading designer and marketer of
Premium Supply chain management
ADIDAS GROUP OF COMPANY [pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] Adidas Executive Board is composed of four members who reflect the diversity and internationality of the Group: Herbert Hainer The Chief Executive Officer Glenn Bennett Responsible for Global Operations Robin J. Stalker Responsible for Finance Erich Stamminger Responsible for Global Brands
Premium Adidas
Financial Analysis Nike Inc. vs. Adidas AG Submitted to: Dr. Ismail Gomaa By: Ghada Mahmoud Saafan 1/1/2010 CONTENTS Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................2 Methodology: ................................................................................................................................................................3 Nike Inc. ............
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Balance sheet Asset
financialAnnual Financials for Nike Inc. Cl B View Ratios Fiscal year is June-May. All values USD millions. | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 5-year trend | Sales/Revenue | 19.08B | 18.96B | 20.89B | 24.12B | 25.31B | | Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) incl. D&A | 10.91B | 10.61B | 11.47B | 13.62B | 14.28B | | COGS excluding D&A | 10.56B | 10.27B | 11.12B | 13.23B | 14.28B | | Depreciation & Amortization Expense | 346.9M | 337.2M | 351M | 395M | - | | Depreciation | 335M
Premium Revenue Expense Earnings before interest and taxes
relation to its competitors. For example‚ Adidas pays its employees in relation to Nike’s pay to its employees. The organization sets its pay limits with respect to the lower limit pay rate and upper limit pay rate (Hill &Irwin‚ 11). According to Nike code of conduct‚ the organization uses both internal alignment and external competitiveness. This is because it pays minimum wage to its employees or the popular industrial wage. The organization compares the two rates and pays it employees the
Premium Employment Management Minimum wage
PROMOTION! NIKE Nike is the world’s #1 manufacturer and marketer of athletic footwear and apparel. Almost out of the blue‚ the company established itself as one of the world’s most familiar brands during the 1980s and 1990s.and now 2000s. As familiar as a Coke bottle or Big Mac‚ the Nike "swoosh" logo came to symbolize not just sports culture‚ but street culture‚ as the appeal of the star players who endorsed the brand was carried onto city streets. Nike is undisputed leader in sports-oriented
Premium
Reesport‚Reejoy.Always challenge and lead through creativity. | Price Analyzing the prices of Puma and comparing with its competitor prices was discovered‚ that all of them are more or less on the same price levels – medium to high. Although‚ Nike and Adidas products are mostly expensive‚ while Puma is providing products for affordable prices. Today’s Puma is not only sport clothing and equipment‚ but also
Premium Athletic shoe Adidas Reebok
Herbert Hainer‚ CEO Adidas‚ speaks openly and honestly about his efforts to knock Nike off the Top Spot in 2010 by leveraging the firm’s $200 million World Cup sponsorship push to its full advantage. Currently within spitting distance of Nike’s 2007 €11.1 billion revenue‚ Herbert explains how the World Cup equates to big wins for brands like Adidas in terms of sponsorship‚ advertising and exposure. “The World Cup is definitely the biggest event for us‚” he admits‚ adding that football is in the
Premium Adidas FIFA World Cup FIFA
rivalry for the company. Adolph registered the Adidas trade mark in year 1949 and since that time two companies started competing each other to the extend which each company was dispiriting its employees from being friend with other company’s employees. Adidas continued its innovation in order to be step ahead from the competitor by introduce the molded rubber cleats in 1949. The next innovation was footpath shoes with screw-in spikes. By the year 1960 Adidas became the favorite brand in footwear among
Premium Adidas Athletic shoe