Nike vs Puma Easily the biggest grudge match in Germany this month will not be between two of the countries competing‚ but between homegrown Adidas and‚ of course‚ American arch-rivals Nike. The business media is already hot on the Stripes versus the Swoosh‚ with the German brand reportedly splashing out double Nike’s estimated £60m World Cup marketing spend. But what about the shirts themselves? Which ones would you want to play in‚ and which should be left on the backs of the die-hards down the
Premium Nike, Inc. Germany Middle East
better world. | Reethink‚Reesport‚Reejoy.Always challenge and lead through creativity. | Price Analyzing the prices of Puma and comparing with its competitor prices was discovered‚ that all of them are more or less on the same price levels – medium to high. Although‚ Nike and Adidas products are mostly expensive‚ while Puma is providing products for affordable prices. Today’s Puma is not only sport clothing and equipment‚ but also
Premium Athletic shoe Adidas Reebok
Puma is to use AC Milan and Italian footballer Mario Balotelli to drive its repositioning as a performance sports brand after admitting it lacks “brand heat‚ commercial products and desirable distribution”. The German sportswear maker said 2013 had been a “challenging year” when explaining 3 per cent sales slump to €2.9bn (£2.3bn) in the 12 months to December. The decline was accentuated in the last three months of 2013 with sales plummeting more than 13 per cent to €698m (£574m). It admitted
Premium Usain Bolt Puma AG Marketing
financialAnnual Financials for Nike Inc. Cl B View Ratios Fiscal year is June-May. All values USD millions. | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 5-year trend | Sales/Revenue | 19.08B | 18.96B | 20.89B | 24.12B | 25.31B | | Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) incl. D&A | 10.91B | 10.61B | 11.47B | 13.62B | 14.28B | | COGS excluding D&A | 10.56B | 10.27B | 11.12B | 13.23B | 14.28B | | Depreciation & Amortization Expense | 346.9M | 337.2M | 351M | 395M | - | | Depreciation | 335M
Premium Revenue Expense Earnings before interest and taxes
is to compare and identify the various marketing strategies followed by two of the world’s best sports company’s Adidas and Nike as they have been in rivalry for a long time. I would also like to find out the strengths and weakness of both the companies. INTRODUCTION OF THE COMPANIES ADIDAS Adidas AG is a German sports apparel manufacturer and parent company of the Adidas Group‚ which consists of the Reebok sportswear company‚ golf company (including Ashworth)‚ and Rockport. Besides
Premium Nike, Inc. Adidas
the market for over 5 decades now. Adidas is a multinational corporation that designs and manufacturers sports attire‚ accessories and footwear. Besides footwear Adidas also produces bags‚ shirts‚ jerseys watches and eyewear. Adidas is the largest sportswear manufacturer in Europe and second largest around the globe. Adidas was founded in 1948 by Adolf Dassler. Adolf is related to Rudolph the owner of Puma and now they are rivals in Germany. Puma and Adidas entered a fierce rivalry after World
Premium Nike, Inc. Athletic shoe
PUMA Contents Introduction to Puma 3 Marketing Orientation 3 Product Orientation 3 Sales Orientation 4 Puma Orientation 4 The competitive advantage/disadvantage of puma. 5 SWOT Analysis 7 Marketing Mix 8 Product: 8 Price: 9 Place: 10 Promotion: 10 References 12 Introduction to Puma Puma is one of the world’s leading Sport lifestyle companies. As an organisation it designs and produces sports equipment‚ footwear‚ apparel and accessories. Puma distributes its products
Premium Marketing
sport companies for Nike and Adidas. Introduction My area of study for this project would be more on comparing the performances for Nike and Adidas for the past 5 years. In this project I would explain the performance such as growth in profits‚ revenues‚ market share‚ the company employers and employees‚ size of the market share‚ steps for increasing the social performance‚ products performance‚ dividends per share‚ assets and the company investment. Nike and Adidas and have been the top two leading
Premium Nike, Inc. Adidas Sport
VS 1 A COMPARITIVE ANALYSIS OF MARKETING STRATERGIES FOLLOWED BY NIKE AND ADIDAS TEAM MEMBERS ANUPAMA VENU CLAES JOTORP DEEPAK TUSHIR GUSTAV TENERZ SAIRAM KRISHNAN SANJAY SHARMA SUNANDA SURESH 09014 09126 09032 09128 09088 09090 09112 2 INDEX 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. BRIEF ANALYSIS OF INDUSTRY 1.2. BRIEF DEFINITON OF INDUSTRY 1.2.1.TRENDS IN THE INDUSTRY 1.2.2.MARKET ANALYSIS 1.2.3.MAJOR PLAYERS AND MARKET SHARES 1.3. MAJOR FORCES SHAPING THE INDUSTRY 1.3
Premium Nike, Inc.
PUMA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD AUSTRALIAN PACKAGING COVENANT 2010-2015 ACTION PLAN PUMA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD AUSTRALIAN PACKAGING COVENANT (APC) 2010-2015 ACTION PLAN CONTENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. Executive Summary Company Profile 2.1 2.2 3.1 4.1 4.2 Puma at a glance Environmental Initiatives 1 2 5 5 2 2 Covenant Contact Officer Environmental Task Force Types of Packaging Used Timetable for Review Introduction Design 5.2.1 Covenant Goals 5.2.2 Outcome 5.2.3 Key Performance Indicator 5.2.4 Current
Premium Sustainability Packaging and labeling Packaging