Small Claims Courts Small Claims courts are a crucial aspect of the Canadian Legal system that could even be relevant to you one day. Small Claims courts are were created to try and give the average Joe a cheap‚ simple way to settle any type of arguments involving property or finances‚ without necessarily having to know a whole lot about law. You do not need to know many legal terms and the case usually consists of you telling your story for the judge to make a decision. It is a court that was
Premium Lawyer Dispute resolution Judge
of resources were also a concern amongst drug court participants. They were grateful for the resources available through their drug court program but believed there could be more services and other support systems (Farole & Cissner‚ 2005; Goldkamp et al.‚ 2001). Some of those extra resources wanted by drug court participants were enhanced access to employment‚ job training‚ education‚ transportation and housing services. A good proportion of drug court participants or recent grads have difficulties
Premium Drug addiction Addiction Drug
Karan Puri Miranda vs. Arizona (1966) In Miranda v. Arizona (1966)‚ the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects‚ prior to police questioning‚ must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. The case began with the 1963 arrest of Phoenix resident Ernesto Miranda‚ who was charged with rape‚ kidnapping‚ and robbery. Miranda was not informed of his rights prior to the police interrogation. During the two-hour interrogation‚ Miranda allegedly
Premium Supreme Court of the United States President of the United States Richard Nixon
Over the past two decades‚ specialized courts have resulted‚ according to Quinn (2009)‚ in response to‚ the “problem solving court” movement (As cited in Cole and Getz‚ 2013). Such courts‚ Quinn (2009) noted‚ have come to focus on social concerns such as‚ addiction‚ domestic violence‚ and mental health issues‚ and have come to asset that such courts have cured addiction‚ addressed issues of intimate violence‚ prevented recidivism‚ reduced costs‚ and implied that they have even saved lives (As cited
Premium Domestic violence Crime Appeal
v. Board of Education case. Federalism under the Marshall Courts serves significance‚ because it contributed to the evolution and the representation of the branches of the government while shaping the ideology of a traditional government. To begin‚ Federalism in this context is in relations with the Marshall Court‚ “referring to the Supreme Courts of the United States from 1801 to 1835‚ when John Marshall served as the fourth Chief Justice of the United States” (wiki). Moreover‚ Federalism can signify
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Federalism
Near was taken into custody by the state police. The state arrested the man because of a law called the Minnesota Gag Law of 1925. This law did not allow media that was considered to be hateful to be passed to the public. 3. Opinion Supreme Court ruled that the Minnesota Gag law was a direct violation of the 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution. The ruling of Near v. Minnesota‚ distinguished between hateful speech and hateful actions. It was found that the newspaper was not an immediate
Free United States Constitution Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
General Outline of a Moot Court Argument INTRO May it please the court‚ my name is _____ and I represent the Petitioner/Respondent __(name)___. [REBUTTAL REQUEST & PROCEDURAL BLURB (for Petitioner ONLY)] With the court’s permission‚ I would like to reserve 2 minutes for rebuttal. Thank you. This case is on appeal from the District/Circuit Court (name of court). The District/Circuit Court denied Petitioner’s request for _____‚ holding _____. ROADMAP Your honors‚ _______ is a
Premium Judge Question Law
SILENCE! THE COURT IS IN SESSION By Vijay Tendulkar Study Material Prepared By Dr. Ratna Raman‚ Department of English‚ Sri Venkateswara College‚ Univ. of Delhi‚ Delhi. Edited By Dr. Anil Aneja‚ Department of English‚ School of Open Learning‚ Univ. of Delhi‚ Delhi – 110007. Prescribed for the Discipline Course in English For B.A. (Programme) IIIrd Year Students. 2 “SILENCE ! THE COURT IS IN SESSION” By VIJAY TENDULKAR Objectives Lesson Plan for the students of the BA Program‚ Elective English
Premium Drama
Whether or not children are competent enough to withstand trial in court has been an interesting question since at least the 1960’s. The problem with trials before the 60’s was that defendants forced to argue their own cases‚ instead of having lawyers do this for them. This included children if they were accused of a crime that needed a trial. It did not happen that often‚ if even at all in some places‚ and so when it did actually happen these children were wrongfully tried as adults would have been
Premium Crime Criminology Juvenile delinquency
juvenile may be brought to a juvenile court and if the crime is more severe‚ an adult court may be more appropriate. The author will discuss the differences between adult and juvenile courts. Finally‚ it will discuss what can happen if juvenile courts are abolished and implications for young offenders. Compare and
Premium Crime Criminology Sociology