Integrated services and multi-agency working It’s self-evident that people not talking to each other is counterproductive. And‚ in the world of children’s services‚ it’s been said many times (and ought to be again‚ lest we forget): not talking to each other sometimes leads to disastrous consequences‚ of which little Victoria Climbie’s death will forever be a sad example. So‚ the multi-agency approach to supporting children‚ young people and families with extra help‚ early‚ makes perfect sense
Premium Childhood Young Youth
Cruzan v. Director‚ Missouri Department of Health U.S. 261 (1990) was a United States Supreme Court case argued on December 6‚ 1989 and decided on June 25‚ 1990. In a 5-4 court decision‚ the court found in favor of the Missouri Dept. of Health. The court affirmed the ruling of the Supreme Court of Missouri. However‚ it upheld the legal standard that competent persons are able to exercise the right to refuse medical treatment under the Due Process Clause and its implied right to privacy. Because
Free Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution United States
Contract Law Cases The Offer Meeting of minds: Clarke v Earl of Dunraven and Mount Earl: Yacht races. Letters sent in Communication (in writing‚ speech and conduct): Carlil v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co: pay back 100 if you get influenza. Deposit 1000 The Acceptance: Strictly in response to
Premium Contract
Peer leadership What is it? Peer leadership is a concept that may be integral to any peer-based intervention and is most often found in peer education programs.1‚2 Peer leadership programs are also used to foster the development of leadership skills within the context of social justice.3 How does it work? Peer leaders are individuals who already possess natural characteristics of leading others and who are nominated to take on a leadership position to carry out a more guiding and facilitating role
Premium Leadership
Michael Sanchez NS4874 CMGT 3280-01 Homework #1 Slavin v. Borinstein (1994) The issue in this case is between the plaintiff‚ Leon Slavin‚ and the defendant‚ Joan W. Borinstein. Slavin is suing Borinstein over a dispute that erupted over payments on a construction project that were not received; on a project Slavin was building for Borinstein. Borinstein and her people agreed to pay Slavin 10 percent of the cost on a house they wanted to build in Los Angles. They would make the payments in
Premium Contract
behind close doors? In this paper we will analyze and summarize a case study where Rob Lebow has to make a decision whether or not Microsoft should get involved with a certain company. We will also discuss what choices were available to Rob Lebow and what we would have done and why we would do such a thing if we where in their position. The Aggressive Ad Agency Summary Our cause study deals with Rob Lebow‚ who was a director of corporate communications
Premium Microsoft Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet
Cases in Canadian Law Dehghani v. Canada: The appellant‚ a citizen of Iran‚ arrived in Canada on May 13‚ 1989‚ and claimed refugee status. After being questioned in the primary examination line‚ he was referred to a secondary examination‚ which involved a long wait‚ and‚ as he did not speak English‚ an interpreter was provided for him. At the secondary interview‚ the appellant omitted significant facts. This case involves two issues that are worthy of analysis‚ as he claims‚ first of all‚ that
Premium Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Supreme Court of the United States Canada
Now we turn to discuss the case study. I hope everyone have already done it. The main issue of the case study is that Chu has been the New South Wales (NSW) Operations Manager for Computers Pty Ltd. Due to Chu’s senior position knows the identity and requirements of the company’s major clients. In March 2007‚ Chu decides to retire and agrees to not compete against the company in NSW for two years. However in April 2007‚ Systems Pty Ltd actively solicits business from the customers of Computers Pty
Premium Corporation Subsidiary Contract
action of legal aspects. The aspects will be focused on enterprise liability‚ real and intellectual property‚ governance principles of regulatory compliance requirements‚ and specific international laws that must be adhered to Riordan Manufacturing and the stages for employees to adhere to these laws. Also implementing Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) based on the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) eight interrelated components. II. Mission Statement According
Premium Law World Trade Organization Risk
LGEAL PERSONALITY Foss v Harbottle (1843) 67 ER 189 is a leading English precedent in corporate law. In any action in which a wrong is alleged to have been done to a company‚ the proper claimant is the company itself. This is known as "the rule in Foss v Harbottle"‚ and the several important exceptions that have been developed are often described as "exceptions to the rule in Foss v Harbottle". Amongst these is the ’derivative action’‚ which allows a minority shareholder to bring a claim on behalf
Premium