contents 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 Strategic Issues of Ford 4 3.0 The External Environment 5 3.1 PESTEL Analysis 5 3.1.1 Political Environment 5 3.1.2 Economic Environment 6 3.1.3 Social Environment 7 3.1.4 Technological Environment 7 3.1.5 Natural environment 8 3.1.6 Legal Environment 8 3.2 The Industry Porters’ Five Model 9 3.2.1 Buyer’s Power - Moderate 9 3.2.2 Suppliers’ Power - Low 10 3.2.3 Threat of New Entrants - Low 11 3.2.4 Threat of Substitutes – Slightly Moderate
Premium Automotive industry
Business Ethics Ford Motor Company In the simplest form of utilitarianism‚ promoting the greatest pleasure for the greatest number of people; is a popular ethical business practice. Sometimes this utilitarian theory is considered a controversial theory of morality especially when linked to the cost-benefit analysis versus the risk-benefit analysis‚ ultimately eliminating the human quality of making business decisions. Ford Motor Company‚ Ford Pinto Case‚ is one of the most debatable utilitarian
Premium Ethics Business ethics Morality
Engine Fuel Tank Capacity (liters) Displacement (cc) Compression Ratio Maximum Power (ps/rpm) Maximum Torque (Nm/rpm) Engine Type Fuel System Bore x Stroke (mm) Powertrain Engine Type Max. Output Drive Configuration Max. Torque Transmission Dimension & Weights Wheelbase (mm) Maximum Pick-Up Box Length (mm) Maximum Payload (kg) Ground Clearance (mm) Steering System Steering Wheel Steering Column Type Minimum Turning Radius (m) Brake System Type (Front / Rear) Type and Diameter (Front / Rear) Handbrake
Premium Steering Wheel Tire
Introduction: The Ford Explorer is one of the most popular sport-utility vehicles sold in North America and built by Ford Motor Company. Since the early 1990’s the “Explorer” has been the head of the mid-sized SUV fleet in North America by Ford. It was born as a replacement for the Ford Bronco II‚ which ended production when restyling in 1989‚ did not have the desired market capturing success. In addition‚ safety reports of 1989-1990 suggested the Bronco II was prone to rollovers‚ poor handling
Premium Ford Motor Company Brand
4/25/2012 Kyra M. Tracy Business Ethics- Paper 7 Article: Hiring Character‚ From Intergity Works‚ Strategies for becoming Respected‚ Trusted and Admired Leader. By Dana Telford and Adrian Gostick . Clearly‚ Ford’s CEO Iacocca was an Egoist. People were definitely considered morally irrelevant in his decision-making framework. The Pinto safety issue was evaluated utilizing a Utilitarian framework motivated by the CEO’s Egoism. From a risk management standpoint‚ this may be
Premium Morality Risk Human
-----Ford.com HISTORY Ford Motor Company is an American multinational automaker whose headquarter is based in Dearborn‚ Michigan. It was founded by Henry Ford. The Ford Motor Company was incorporated in 1903. The Ford Oval trademark was first introduced in 1907. Groups of two or three men with the company produced only a few cars a day at the Ford factory on Mack Avenue. Each car was built from components made to order when place by other companies. Henry Ford was years old when he builds
Premium Ford Motor Company
History of Ford in India: 1907 India begins selling the Model A 1926 Ford India is established by Ford of Canada 1935 Indian government officials ask Henry Ford to consider building a car manufacturing plant in Bombay 1941 Mahatma Gandhi sends spinning wheel‚ the symbol of India’s economic independence‚ to Henry Ford. 1954 Ford India operations cease. 1969 Ford re-enters India in a joint venture with Escorts Ltd. to produce tractors. 1991 Ford ceases tractor operations. Ford establishes Climate
Premium Ford Motor Company Automotive industry Automobile
Utilitarian Analysis The Case of the Ford Pinto The Ford Pinto first rolled off the Ford Motor Co. production lines in 1971 and stayed in production in its original state until 1978. The vehicle engineers were tasked to develop the vehicle and put it into production within 25 months‚ which was nearly half the time in which the average new vehicle is put into production. The Ford engineers were aware that rear-end impact safety tests were pretty standard at the time‚ but they were not required
Premium Ford Pinto Cost-benefit analysis Utilitarianism
Executive Summary Ford is one of the leading companies in the auto industry. The director of Supply Chain Systems at Ford was put in a tough position to make recommendations with regards to the company’s supply chain strategy. There are two groups within Ford that have two different opinions on how Ford should be using emerging information technologies and ideas from high tech industries‚ such as Dell‚ to change the way it interacts with suppliers. The first group argued that Ford should adopt Dell’s
Premium Supply chain management Automotive industry Supply chain
Ford Motor Company’s Value Enhancement 1. Does Ford have too much cash? The amount of cash that Ford is carrying on its balance sheet is too much considering that additional money not used for the advancement of the company belongs to the owners of the firm‚ the shareholders. Having too much cash on its balance sheet will be a disincentive to Ford’s employees who consequently will feel not feel an urgency to perform and add value to the company. Notwithstanding the fact that the company
Premium Stock market Stock Ford Motor Company