55‚000 employees from over 80 different nations. This has however caused some issues within the organization also‚ as was the case in this case study. This particular case highlights the problems that arose within Airbus during the construction of it’s line of A380 Aircrafts where Airbus lost 2 Billion euros. Cross-cultural differences between French and German workers created an atmosphere of dis-trust amongst workers that can be relayed back to decisions made within management that could have
Premium Organization Organizational studies Organizational studies and human resource management
CLASSIFICATION Impact on Impact on Impact on Impact on Effect on Category Impact on flight OPS line maintenance shop maintenance environment flight PAX comfort : : : : : : : Low Medium Medium None None Economic Low RELEVANT DOCUMENTATION Airbus OPS documentation Airbus Maintenance documentation Other documentation CONSEQUENCE : The valve failure can generate: - PACK REGUL FAULT ECAM Warning associated to Bypass valve fault message when BPV is faulty‚ - COND TRIM SYST FAULT Ecam Warning associated
Premium Airbus
Airbus Aircraft manufacturing company 09-Jun-11 giorgi meliqiZe Contents tipi: subsidirebuli industria: sahaero industria daarsda: 1970 (‚‚earbasis” industria) 2001 (Airbus SAS) Stab-bina: blegnaki‚ safrangeTi Semosavali: 27.45 miliardi (2008) wminda mogeba: 1.597 miliardi (2008) personali: 52 000 dedobili kompania: EADS Svilobili: Airbus Military veb-gverdi: www.airbus.com Airbus SAS aris TviTmfrinavebis sawarmo‚ romelic warmoadgens EEADS (Europian
Premium
Boeing Versus Airbus In today’s marketplace‚ distinct differences in the way competitive products work have become increasingly rare. But functional product differentiation is exactly what the rivalry between the Airbus A380 and the Boeing 787 Dreamliner is all about: Two companies with fundamentally different products‚ based on diametrically opposite visions of the future‚ engaged in a Hatfields versus McCoys battle with billions of dollars at stake. Each company
Premium Boeing 747 Boeing 787 Qantas
Net Present Value and Internal Rate of Return by Harold Bierman‚ Jr Executive Summary • • • Net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) are two very practical discounted cash flow (DCF) calculations used for making capital budgeting decisions. NPV and IRR lead to the same decisions with investments that are independent. With mutually exclusive investments‚ the NPV method is easier to use and more reliable. Introduction To this point neither of the two discounted cash flow procedures
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Capital budgeting
When cash inflows are even: NPV = R × 1 − (1 + i)-n − Initial Investment i In the above formula‚ R is the net cash inflow expected to be received each period; i is the required rate of return per period; n are the number of periods during which the project is expected to operate and generate cash inflows. When cash inflows are uneven: NPV = R1 + R2 + R3 + ... − Initial Investment (1 + i)1 (1 + i)2 (1 + i)3 Where‚ i is the target rate of return per period;
Premium Net present value Rate of return Cash flow
this online NPV Calculation Tool http://finance.thinkanddone.com/online-n… we get the following NPV at 15% Net Cash Flows CF0 = -3000000 CF1 = 1100000 CF2 = 1450000 CF3 = 1300000 CF4 = 950000 Discounted Net Cash Flows DCF1 = 1100000/(1+0.15)^1 = 1100000/1.15 = 956521.74 DCF2 = 1450000/(1+0.15)^2 = 1450000/1.3225 = 1096408.32 DCF3 = 1300000/(1+0.15)^3 = 1300000/1.52087 = 854771.1 DCF4 = 950000/(1+0.15)^4 = 950000/1.74901 = 543165.58 NPV Calculation NPV = 956521.74 +
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Cash flow
ASSIGNMENT TOPIC: “THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF USINFG NPV (NET PRESENT VALUE) AND IRR (INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN)” NPV (NET PRESENT VALUE) The difference between the present value of cash inflows and the present value of cash outflows. NPV is used in capital budgeting to analyze the profitability of an investment or project. NPV analysis is sensitive to the reliability of future cash inflows that an investment or project will yield. NPV compares the value of a dollar today to the value of that
Premium Management Education Marketing
The crossover rate‚ where the NPVs are the same is 8.16%. Project A Project B Required Return 8.25% Required Return 8.25% Cash Flows Period Cash Flows Cash Flows Period Cash Flows Initial Outlay -8‚500 0 -8‚500 Initial Outlay -9‚500 0 -9‚500 1 3‚600 1 3‚900 2 2‚400 2 2‚900 3 2‚850 3 2‚900 4 5‚200 4 5‚550 Discounted Payback Period 3.23 Discounted Payback Period 3.28 NPV $2‚907.51 NPV $2‚905.64 Profitability Index
Premium Net present value
assess whether it is viable to invest or not the NPV technique can be used to compare the present value of returns and costs. If the NPV is negative it implies that costs exceed returns and hence it would not be advisable to invest in such projects. There are also other investment appraisal techniques that are employed apart from the NPV; these are the pay back method‚ accounting rate of return and internal rate of return method. Net present value (NPV) is generally considered as the most correct method
Premium Net present value