Limitations of the BCG model. The BCG model is criticised for having a number of limitations (Kotler 2003; McDonald 2003): ➢ There are other reasons other than relative market share and market growth that could influence the allocation of resources to a product or SBU: reasons such as the need for strong brand name and product positioning could compel resource allocation to an SBU or product (Drummond & Ensor 2004). ➢ What is more‚ the model rests on net cash consumption or generation as the
Premium Marketing Economics Cash flow
BCG Matrix Product Relative Market Share Market Growth Classification Note D 2 Leader 3% Low Cash Cow Generates more cash than needed to maintain business. Requires frequent “milking” and very little investment. A 3 Leader 20% High Star Requires a high level of funding to battle competitors and maintain growth rate. When industry slows‚ has potential to become cash cow if market share is retained. C 1 Co-Leader 25% High C 1 Co-Leader 25% High Question Mark Potential to gain market share and
Premium Marketing Stock market Strategic management
increasingly complex. No longer simply the domain of the warehouse manager or logistics director‚ supply chain management is viewed by most companies as a mission-critical element. In this special report‚ experts from Wharton and Boston Consulting Group (BCG) discuss strategies for maximizing the value of supply chains‚ avoiding inefficiencies‚ managing the omnipresent risk of disruption‚ and evaluating the pros and cons of supply chain enterprise systems. ‘You Can’t Manage What You Can’t Measure’: Maximizing
Premium Supply chain management
5 BCG matrix Brands under Gucci group The Gucci Groupe in now a muiti- brand conglomerate ‚with a collection of high fashion brands ‚like : Gucci Yves Saint Laurent Alexander McQueen Stella McCartney Sergio Rossi Balenciaga Bottega Veneta Today ‚ it is one of the world’s leading luxury brands‚in fact the name Gucci conjures a vibe of exclusivity and prestige‚an Italian brand of quality. BCG Matrix of Gucci Group [pic] [pic] As the Creative director
Premium Gucci Luxury good
Nike was formed by $1000 and the handshake of 2 men. Those 2 men were Bill Bowerman‚ the University of Oregon track coach and Phil Knight‚ a University of Oregon accounting student and a middle-distance runner under Coach Bowerman. Bill brought jogging to America‚ and then built an unrivaled track and field program at that university. Bowerman taught his athletes to seek the competitive advantage everywhere - in their bodies‚ their gear and their passion. In 1962 Knight had this you’re-crazy-it-will-never-work-
Premium Nike, Inc. Bill Bowerman Athletic shoe
Star: Star denotes high market growth and high relative market share in the industry. This position defends when the organization invest large amount in this segment. There is decrease in the growth when compared to last year‚ so this is the reason scooter comes under star category. Cash cow: Cash cow denotes low market growth and high relative market share in the industry. In moped sector it is the major contribution to the market share because moped have more advantages like low cost when compared
Free Economics Investment Manufacturing
which I used data‚ ideas‚ theories‚ or words‚ whether quoted directly or paraphrased. I further acknowledge that this written work has been prepared by me specifically for this course. Signed the student‚ 04/12/2007 EADS-AIRBUS (Case Study) [pic] EADS-AIRBUS Table of contents Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………..3 History of EADS ………………………………………………………………………4-5 Organization of EADS …………………………………………………………………. 6 Divisions of EADS ………………………………...…………………………………7-8 Strategy
Premium EADS Airbus
RECOMMENDATIONS: Airbus has become a leader in commercial aircraft manufacturing relying heavily on an integrated position of low-cost leadership and technology-focused differentiation. Boeing‚ their major competitor‚ has a position in the market that has consistently eroded while maintaining an integrated position of brand value differentiation and long term cost reduction through acquisition and economies of scale. In this section‚ we will discuss two main ideas: first‚ the new challenges facing Airbus as an
Premium Strategic management Boeing Management
1. Running Head; Boeing Vs. Airbus 1 (NAME) BOEING VS AIRBUS (COURSE) (PROFESSOR) (DATE) Total World count; 6386 2011 2. Boeing VS Airbus 2 Abstract The demand facing aircraft manufacturers for new orders is in principal derived fromthe perceived future demand for commercial aviation. Several key external economic factorsare likely to outline demand for new aircraft. These factors are accessed from the perspectiveof decision makers in the airline industry‚ Airbus and Boeing‚ in this paper. Also analysed
Premium Boeing Airbus Aerospace
Boeing’s e-Enabled Advantage Contents Executive Summary 3 Problem Statement 3 Internal SWOT 3 External SWOT 4 Michael Porter’s 5 Competitive Forces 5 Executive Summary Boeing is a world leader in the aerospace industry. At one point they were the highest seller’s commercial aviation with no competition in sight. That all changed‚ and soon Boeing had to change. Background Boeing was founded in 1916 by William Boeing. The company started by making small seaplanes with low top speeds
Premium Aerospace Boeing Airline