How well did Alexander III deal with the problems that he faced? Unlike his father‚ Alexander III did manage to survive his reign relatively unscathed‚ which indicates that he dealt with his problems well‚ at least in the short term. Alexander III inherited a country fraught with economic difficulties‚ violent extremists and social tensions. His priority was to maintain his autocratic power and restore the power and influence of the nobility – his most trusted support base. Although he achieved
Premium Russia Alexander III of Russia Economics
How successful was Alexander II in dealing with opposition to his regime? Judging by the fact that Alexander was assassinated in 1881 by People’s Will‚ one would assume that he failed – completely- to overcome opposition to his regime‚ however he ruled for over 25 years and managed to keep his opposition under control during that time using several different methods and measures which will be discussed in this essay. The first measure he took shortly after he came to power was to emancipate the serfs
Premium Russian Empire Government Alexander II of Russia
Carolina Leguizamón DID ALEXANDER OWE EVERYTHING TO HIS PARENTS OR DIDI HIS OWN PERSONALITY PROPELED HIM TO GREATNESS? Alexander the great had a lot to owe to his family‚ thanks to their influence he gained the desire to become a conqueror and a successful men during his lifetime he achieved enormous that made him remarkable throughout history. He is still remembered today for his greatness and his achievements. During his childhood he spent most of the time with his mother and had some difficulties
Premium Alexander the Great Philip II of Macedon
What problems did Russia have during the reign of Alexander III? Alexander III inherited many problems in 1881 following his father’s death. Alexander III was known to have been extremely conservative and reversed many of the reforms and liberal measures of which his father (Alexander II) had begun before his death. Alexander III returned conservatism in Russia and despite Russia’s attempts of becoming a modern European state by the 1870s Many amongst the educated classes felt that the emancipation
Premium Russia Russian Empire Nicholas II of Russia
TO WHAT EXTENT DOES TSAR ALEXANDER II DESERVE THE TITLE “TSAR LIBERATOR”? Tsar of Russia from 1818 to 1881. Son of Nicholas I ascended the throne in 1855. Signed in Paris (1856) the peace that ended the Crimean War began the construction of a vast program of reforms. Open to ideas of social renewal‚ emancipated the serfs (1861) without satisfy the peasantry‚ which was granted in usufruct‚ with a strong payment of ransom‚ only a portion of the lands they occupied. Instituted the Zemstvo‚ provincial
Premium Russia Alexander II of Russia Russian Empire
Alexander McCall Smith‚ the author of the award winning novel The No. 1 Ladies’ Detective Agency spoke in a recent interview in The Sydney Morning Herald (December 2006) about his famously optimistic views of Africa and its people. The works of many African authors express rather grim and bleak views in comparison to McCall Smith’s view. In a “Foreign Correspondent” interview McCall Smith says Botswana is a very beautiful country and that Africa transformed him into a best selling novelist and made
Premium Africa Hope Optimism
Does Alexander II truly deserve the title of liberator? To liberate is to set free (a group or individual) from legal‚ social or political restrictions. There is evidence to suggest that he disliked serfdom. Even his father‚ Nicholas I‚ believed that serfdom was an “evil palpable to all‚” and Alexander II was certainly even more liberally educated than his father. His arguably most fundamental reform was the emancipation of serfdom in 1861. As he said‚ “It is best to abolish serfdom from above
Premium Crimean War Russian Empire Russia
you agree that Alexander III’s reign deserves the title “The reaction”? The term “reaction” refers to the idea of opposition to the ideals of reform; it refers to the idea of a backwards change‚ usually a change towards more traditional views and in the case of Alexander III it can be argued to whether his reign was completely reactionary or reformist or to whether only some parts where. When Alexander III took the position of Tsar from his father in 1881; his father Alexander II had started
Premium Russia Alexander III of Russia Alexander II of Russia
How far did the reaction under Alexander III indicate the short-sightedness of the Tsarist Government? When Alexander III came into power earlier than he expected in 1881‚ he faced many problems that he needed to overcome. The reforms left by his father put his own supreme political power at risk and he had the problem of keeping the large multi-ethnic empire together. Also‚ he faced opposition from extremist groups such as the ‘People’s Will’ so he had the constant fear of being assassinated
Premium Soviet Union Russian Empire Alexander III of Russia
The debate on whether Alexander II was a Tsar Liberator is one which divides the opinion of many historians who examine Russian history. Alexander II introduced many reforms during his reign which revolutionised the political‚ social and economic landscape of Russia and were considered by many as ‘liberating’. My definition of ‘to liberate’ is to set free‚ either from oppression‚ confinement or indeed foreign control. Did Tsar Alexander do this and to what extent? The Emancipation of Serfs in 1861
Premium Alexander II of Russia Russia Alexander III of Russia