(Monday) NFPA-1.8(A) -Legal assistant‚ Carl‚ may have engaged in unauthorized practice of law by taking on a case without a supervising attorney’s knowledge and by giving legal advice to an inquiring client(s) regarding whether or not to pursue alimony. Furthermore‚ Carl negotiated the price of a fixed rate service without supervision‚ something only an attorney has the authority to do‚ which could also constitute as another act of unauthorized practice of law. EC1.7 (A)- Legal assistant‚ Carl
Premium Lawyer
Jane and Zeke through the lobby‚ Carl was discussing the case‚ alimony‚ and other information pertaining to the case that other’s that are not assigned to the case could have possibly over heard. NFPA Ethical Considerations - 1.5 (A) “A paralegal shall preserve all confidential information provided by the client or acquired from other sources before‚ during‚ and after the course of the professional relationship.” By discussing alimony‚ fees‚ and other information pertaining to costs‚ Carl acted as
Premium Lawyer Confidentiality Secrecy
According to the Internal Revenue Service‚ a taxpayer has the choice between five different filing statues. The five statuses are‚ Single‚ Married Filing Separately‚ Married Filing Jointly‚ Head of Household‚ and Qualifying Widow(er) with dependent child. For the couple in question‚ the recommendation I am making is that they use the filing status of married filing jointly. Since the couple has three children they will qualify for three dependency exemptions as well as two exemptions for themselves
Premium Taxation in the United States
29. Powers of natural guardian under Muslim Law. 30. Irretrievable breakdown theory. 31. Sapinda relationship. 32. Judicial Separation. 33. Dowry. 34. Alimony pendent lite. 35. Rights of Coparcener. 36. Triple Talaq. 37. Essential ceremonies of valid marriage. 38. Discuss the ground of divorce under Christian Marriage Act. 39. Permanent Alimony. 40. Dwelling house. 41. Classes of heirs. 42. Disqualified heirs. 43. Smruti. 44. Non-Ajavaharika debt. 45. Agnates and cognates. 46. Notional partition
Premium Marriage
PECO Universal Services – Customer Assistance Program (CAP) Application INSTRUCTIONS: Please complete the application below. Attach proof of total gross income (before taxes) for each household member including yourself‚ and sign your name at the X. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL INFORMATION IN ORDER FOR THIS APPLICATION TO BE PROCESSED. (Please Print) 1. Enter your account number‚ home phone number‚ name‚ address‚ and cell phone number 2. Enter the name of all members of your household including yourself
Premium Family law Employment Household income in the United States
1. Name: Mr. 2. Fin no: 3. Assignment: Cases on Contract law 4. Course: Diploma of hospitality management (Food & Beverage) 5. Intake: 35 6. Lecturer: Mr. Roland Foo Hee Wan 7. Date Of submission: 17th Jan’ 2012 Content 1. Introduction…………….……………………………………………………….….Page 3 2.Tort case …………………………………………………………………………..Page 4‚ 5 3. Contract Cases………………………………………………………………….Page 5‚ 6‚ 7 4. References…………………………………………………………………………Page
Premium Contract
BOONTON‚ N.J.‚ -- During Christmastime in 2006‚ Toniann Ruja took a 10-day dream vacation to Hawaii with her husband and two daughters who were both in elementary school. “Both my husband at the time and I had a steady income‚ and we had been waiting for the financial opportunity for a trip like this‚” Ruja said as she sat at the kitchen table of her quaint townhouse that she bought four years ago‚ during her divorce. Within a year‚ Ruja’s husband lost both his trucking company and his income. Nearly
Premium Family Mother Father
Than Clients Rule 4.1 Truthfulness In Statements To Others. The NFPA Ethical Considerations not followed by the paralegal were- EC-1.7(c) ‚ EC-1.2(f) and EC-1.8(a)-this was EC was violated by the paralegal giving the client advice regarding the alimony mentioned during the meet Carl had with the client. TUESDAY-- The violations committed on Tuesday were done by the paralegal. The paralegal avoided the income issue that persists with the client‚ as the client indicated she makes money on
Premium Ethics Morality Business ethics
Advocates hold that through the combination of laws permitting no-fault divorce‚ and the prevailing conditions in divorce courts that substantially favor the wife over the husband in disputes over child custody‚ visitation rights‚ child support‚ alimony‚ ownership of the family residence and other shared property (Rosenbloom‚ 2006). It is possible for a woman to divorce her husband unilaterally while simultaneously depriving him of the right to see his offspring and financially crippling him (Rubin
Premium Divorce Marriage Family law
Understanding the Home Loan Application and Mortgage Approval - The Mortgage Lender Analysis Do You Pass The Mortgage Lender Analysis? When a mortgage lender reviews a real estate loan application‚ the primary concern for both home loan applicant‚ the buyer‚ and the mortgage lender is to approve loan requests that show high probability of being repaid in full and on time‚ and to disapprove requests that are likely to result in default and eventual foreclose. How is the mortgage lenders decision
Premium Mortgage loan Loan Real estate