Running head: WRITING AN ARGUMENT PAPER Writing an Argument Paper LaQthia Cooks University of Phoenix Management – MGT521 Instructor: Diane Hunt-Wagner August 8‚ 2011 Writing an Argument Paper The Internet contains several encyclopedias and research websites. Some websites are valid‚ credible‚ and reliable whereas‚ other websites are not. This paper represents as an argument of whether Wikipedia online encyclopedia is a valid‚ credible‚ or reliable source of information and
Premium Wikipedia
Della Alfian Professor Mitchell GEW 101 6 September 2015 Convincing Arguments The Freedom Of Speech has been a right to individuals who wish to express themselves in different ways. Rhetorical Device is one of the most important elements of writing due to the fact that it enables the writer to understands how to create an effective argument. All arguments at least have a thesis statement‚ which consist the main idea. In order to enhance an essay‚ writers should provide an evidence
Premium Writing Rhetoric Essay
Many people have tried to deny Christ’s Resurrection. There are four main arguments in which they try to do so. Although‚ each one of them can easily be proved false. The first argument is the stolen-body story. This argument means that the Body of Christ was stolen from the tomb by the Apostles while the guards were asleep. This however‚ does not make sense. If the guards were asleep‚ how do they know the Apostles stole the body? Adding on‚ Roman soldiers did not sleep on duty‚ especially when
Premium
Arguments in support of my thesis 1)Making abortion illegal doesn’t stop abortion‚ it just makes it less safe. The number of women getting abortions doesn’t change‚ the thing that changes is that women die from having unsafe abortions. 78‚000 women die every year from having unsafe abortions. 2) Religious ideaology is no foundation for any laws. We do not have laws prohibiting the eating of pork nor do we have laws against pre-martial sex. Laws should be based off of logical reasoning from the
Free Pregnancy Abortion Logic
Arguments Supporting Torture to Protect America’s Security When at Risk Justifying the needs of implementing various methods of torture is strongly a recommended option to protecting America’s security and American citizens. While the debate of whether the use of torture is valid to protect the United States of America overall‚ supporters of the argument strongly argue that interrogating terrorists is only useful when various torture methods are involved. During one of the United States of America’s
Premium Torture United States Human rights
Huxley and Arnold After reading Thomas Henry Huxley’s lecture “Science and Culture” and Matthew Arnold’s response “Literature and Science”‚ I thought critically about what the two men have said and the basis of both arguments. Huxley emphasizes on teaching physical science because it is a necessity for human advancement. Matthew Arnold counter argues Huxley’s lecture with a few key points. The important concept Arnold mentions is that literature is not just acquiring an exquisite lexicon‚ but instead
Premium Critical thinking Thought Human
obligation to the company? Loyalty at the base is a strong feeling of support or allegiance. Ronald Duska in his argument for whistleblowers on the basis that one does not have loyalty to a company. Duska defines loyalty as a relationship between two or more people (a group) brought together for mutual fulfilment and support Duska then focuses on loyalty within a group in order to make his argument against a company deserving the similar level of loyalty. “A group takes on an identity and a reality of
Premium
is it developed through the social relations and experiences? These two opposite sides bring up many arguments among the psychologists. Hamlin. J‚ by using three experiments showed us a clear analysis of arguing morality is innate. As a contrast Carpendale‚ Hammond and Atwood argue that morality is through the experience in life. Despite the fact‚ both of these journals represent a strong argument‚ yet they both lack of bringing this matter into a larger picture‚ not only focus on a particular age
Premium Morality Ethics Religion
In the Republic written by Plato‚ Glaucon presented an argument concerning “the nature and origin of justice”. This argument has caused many beliefs and interpretations from Glaucon about justice. Glaucon presents his arguments by stating the four premises and what each one of them mean. His first premise is “It is by nature good to harm”. This premise is broken up into different meanings by nature‚ being referred to character individuality‚ good being referred to an enjoyable experience and harm
Premium Morality Ethics Human
Curtis’s clearly illustrates the premises of his conclusion. His argument is valid‚ relevant‚ and strong for several reasons. First‚ Curtis’ argument in (3) that cats are low maintenance is true. He illustrates that two critical premises showing cats are more independent than dogs. His first premise of no sub-zero walks at 6 a.m. is unfair because not all dogs have to walk outside at 6 a.m.‚ but dogs require walks for exercises and engage their environment. If a person who likes to stay indoors
Premium